Similar articles

UHHRU call for the President’s veto on a law which could endanger property rightsProtests throughout Ukraine following 7-year sentence against civic activist Serhiy SternenkoUkraine imposes sanctions on pro-Russian MP Medvedchuk & his wife. What about criminal proceedings?80-year-old Ukrainian charged with trying to overturn the government via a Facebook repostUkraine’s Parliament abolishes agricultural land moratoriumAccountability for international crimes committed in Ukraine between 2014–2018Ukraine’s parliament moves to abolish moratorium on sale of agricultural landPoroshenko urged to give 6 million rural Ukrainians their freedom after 18 long yearsA brief description of KHPG strategic litigations in July – December 2018Half the candidates for Ukraine’s new Anti-Corruption Court suspected of corruption or questionable rulingsA brief description of KHPG strategic litigations in January–June 2018All faiths outside the Moscow Patriarchate under fire in Russia-backed Donbas ‘republics’Vital rulings could end humiliating discrimination against Ukrainians displaced by Russian aggressionUkrainians get no compensation for destroyed homes in Russia-backed Donbas ’republics’A brief description of KHPG strategic litigations in January–December 2017Public Integrity Council negative opinions should be grounds for disqualifying Supreme Court candidatesA brief description of KHPG strategic litigations in January - June 2017Poroshenko signs anti-Maidan law against NGOs & journalists fighting corruptionA brief description of KHPG strategic litigations in 2016A brief description of KHPG strategic litigations in the second half of 2016

The President ignores UHHRU call to veto law jeopardizing property rights

11.01.2007 |
The reconstruction of residential areas (micro-districts) from the obsolete housing fund is to take place. Whether individuals’ property rights may be violated has proven a secondary consideration. On 27 December the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union called on the President to use his power of veto against the law “On comprehensive reconstruction of residential areas (micro-districts) from the obsolete housing fund” (Draft Law No. 0943), adopted by the Verkhovna Rada on 22 December 2006. The President has, however, signed the law, stating that this was justified by the “inadmissibility of further procrastination with reconstruction, and also taking into account the need to create new mechanisms for stimulating the development of residential construction work and attracting investors”. The President did, admittedly, send letters to the Verkhovna Rada and the Cabinet of Ministers with a considerable list of comments and the request to further improve legislative regulation in this area. His letters point to a number of failings in the law passed which require swift regulation. These include the provisions on bodies of local self-government themselves determining the procedure and time periods for resettling residents, the vacating of residential and non-residential buildings (Article 7), as well as the provisions on prohibiting, after state registration of a ruling to classify property as part of the obsolete housing fund, any actions aimed at changing the owner of these buildings or broaden their rights on resettlement (Article 16). The latter could in practice lead, for example, to it being impossible for parents to register their new-born babies at their place of residence which would immediately impinge upon their constitutionally guaranteed rights. Whether the President’s instructions will be implemented, and when, is not known. Many other such instructions have remained on paper. And the Law which presents a serious threat to Ukrainians’ property rights has already come into force. One has to expect an increase in the number of conflicts in this area and a rise in the number of Ukrainians made homeless. Marina Hovorukhina
 Share this