The court decision on the claim about the compensation of the damage inflicted by the illegal arrest with the comment of the KhG expert.

Today judge Bernatskaya read out the decision on the claim of Andrey Fedur against the General Prosecutor’s office of Ukraine and the newspaper "2000", who spread the slanderous information about him. The decision reads that the court rejected the claim of A. Fedur, since the claimant could not prove that the defendant really spread the above-mentioned information.

Advocates of Boris Feldman got the complete text of the decision on the suit of B. Feldman vs. N. Azarov and the State Tax

The author discusses the question of recompensing moral damage inflicted by inauthentic information published in mass media. He believes that the legislative stipulation of the maximal sum of compensation for moral damage is necessary.

Mykola Selivon, the head of the Constitutional Court, believes that it should be advisable to empower the Constitutional Court to consider the constitutional complaints of citizens.

The Rubezhnoye town court issued the resolution about the cessation of the criminal case against a 70-year-old pensioner, who was accused of strapping with belt a deputy of Severodonetsk town council.

The Constitutional Court considered the case on the official interpretation of the provision of part 1 Article 7 of the Civil Code of the UkrSSR (1540-06) "spreading the information".

The claim "On recompensing the damage inflicted by the passivity of the organs of state power" is considered by the Severodonetsk town court chaired by judge O. Gorbatenko in the accordance with Article 56 of the Constitution of Ukraine.

The Supreme Court of Ukraine demanded for consideration the materials of the criminal case from the Artemovskiy district court of Lugansk, which considered this case in the first instance. Stanislav Lubianoy, the chairman of the Artemovskiy district court, passed to the Supreme Court only 21 volume of the case materials out of 120…

A concrete case is considered of violation by law-enforcing, investigation and prosecution organs of operating laws.

concerning Feldman’s case.

On 14 September, the Lugansk appeal court remained in force the verdict of the Artemovsk district court of 19 April 2002, due to which Boris Feldman, the former vice-president of the bank „“, was condemned to nine years of incarceration with confiscation of his property.

The Ministry of Defense defends itself against paying the compensation to the relatives of the perished crew of the airplane TU-154 shot over the Black Sea last October.

Suggested by MP of Ukraine V. S. Pustovoytov „ the procedure of organizing and conducting peaceful mass actions in Ukraine“

On a disagreement between the Constitution of Ukraine and items 1 and 2 of the draft decision of the 6 thsession of the town council „ the procedure of organizing and conducting meetings, rallies, street marches and demonstrations in Severodonetsk“

(Press release of the attorney firm „Aggev, Berezhnoy and partners“). Appeal court of the Lugansk oblast started to consider the appeal of B. Feldman against the verdict of the Artemovskiy district court of Lugansk. Boris Feldman estoped against the prosecutors. His motive was that the prosecutors committed procedural felonies, when the case was considered by the first instance. He and his advocate handed the appeal court a copy of the decision of the Supreme Court the legal grounds for keeping Feldman under custody are absent, as well as the corresponding petition. The appeal court of the Lugansk oblast rejected the petition of Boris Feldman.

On 8 August 2002 the Kyiv appeal court satisfied the claim of Evhen Zakharov, a co-chairman of the Kharkov Group for human rights protection, against the decision of the Pecherskiy district court concerning the rejection of his claim about the passivity of the Kyiv city prosecutor’s office.

Yu. Mozol was tortured to death in the preliminary prison. By the claim of the ombudsperson the court appointed to pay compensation to Mozola’s parents. The representative of the prosecutor’s office offered the compensation equal to Yu. Mozola’s wages for those three days when he was kept in the preliminary prison. It was a liberal proposition, since the prosecutor’s office might subtract from the compensation the wear of torture tools.

The court permitted the left-wing parties to conduct the meeting devoted to 1 May.

Series of the articles devoted to Boris Feldman’s case.