Court practices on civil responsibility of the state.
The court decision on the claim about the compensation of the damage inflicted by the illegal arrest with the comment of the KhG expert.
Advocate Andrey Fedur vs. the General Prosecutors office of Ukraine
Today judge Bernatskaya read out the decision on the claim of Andrey Fedur against the General Prosecutors office of Ukraine and the newspaper "2000", who spread the slanderous information about him. The decision reads that the court rejected the claim of A. Fedur, since the claimant could not prove that the defendant really spread the above-mentioned information.
Boris Feldman vs. Nikolay Azarov and the State Tax Administration of Ukraine (the case on the authenticity of major Mernichenkos records)
Advocates of Boris Feldman got the complete text of the decision on the suit of B. Feldman vs. N. Azarov and the State Tax
How the judges of the Supreme Court establish the sum of compensation of moral damage
The author discusses the question of recompensing moral damage inflicted by inauthentic information published in mass media. He believes that the legislative stipulation of the maximal sum of compensation for moral damage is necessary.
The Constitutional Court wants to consider constitutional complaints of citizens
Mykola Selivon, the head of the Constitutional Court, believes that it should be advisable to empower the Constitutional Court to consider the constitutional complaints of citizens.
Who is the insulted one?
The Rubezhnoye town court issued the resolution about the cessation of the criminal case against a 70-year-old pensioner, who was accused of strapping with belt a deputy of Severodonetsk town council.
The Constitutional Court interpreted part 1 Article 7 of the Civil Code of the UkrSSR
The Constitutional Court considered the case on the official interpretation of the provision of part 1 Article 7 of the Civil Code of the UkrSSR (1540-06) "spreading the information".
A claim against the state
The claim "On recompensing the damage inflicted by the passivity of the organs of state power" is considered by the Severodonetsk town court chaired by judge O. Gorbatenko in the accordance with Article 56 of the Constitution of Ukraine.
Judge Lubianoy did not dare to pass to the Supreme Court of Ukraine the most part of the documents on Feldmans case
The Supreme Court of Ukraine demanded for consideration the materials of the criminal case from the Artemovskiy district court of Lugansk, which considered this case in the first instance. Stanislav Lubianoy, the chairman of the Artemovskiy district court, passed to the Supreme Court only 21 volume of the case materials out of 120…
Legality of a criminal process: reality or myth?
A concrete case is considered of violation by law-enforcing, investigation and prosecution organs of operating laws.
A consecutive court over B. Feldman has finished
On 14 September, the Lugansk appeal court remained in force the verdict of the Artemovsk district court of 19 April 2002, due to which Boris Feldman, the former vice-president of the bank „“, was condemned to nine years of incarceration with confiscation of his property.
Another national disgrace
The Ministry of Defense defends itself against paying the compensation to the relatives of the perished crew of the airplane TU-154 shot over the Black Sea last October.
The Law of Ukraine (A draft).
Suggested by MP of Ukraine V. S. Pustovoytov „ the procedure of organizing and conducting peaceful mass actions in Ukraine“
Appeal of the Lugansk voters committee to the prosecutor of Severodonetsk
On a disagreement between the Constitution of Ukraine and items 1 and 2 of the draft decision of the 6 thsession of the town council „ the procedure of organizing and conducting meetings, rallies, street marches and demonstrations in Severodonetsk“
Again about Boris Feldmans case
(Press release of the attorney firm „Aggev, Berezhnoy and partners“). Appeal court of the Lugansk oblast started to consider the appeal of B. Feldman against the verdict of the Artemovskiy district court of Lugansk. Boris Feldman estoped against the prosecutors. His motive was that the prosecutors committed procedural felonies, when the case was considered by the first instance. He and his advocate handed the appeal court a copy of the decision of the Supreme Court the legal grounds for keeping Feldman under custody are absent, as well as the corresponding petition. The appeal court of the Lugansk oblast rejected the petition of Boris Feldman.
Court process is lasting.
On 8 August 2002 the Kyiv appeal court satisfied the claim of Evhen Zakharov, a co-chairman of the Kharkov Group for human rights protection, against the decision of the Pecherskiy district court concerning the rejection of his claim about the passivity of the Kyiv city prosecutors office.
Three-day wages for a life.
Yu. Mozol was tortured to death in the preliminary prison. By the claim of the ombudsperson the court appointed to pay compensation to Mozolas parents. The representative of the prosecutors office offered the compensation equal to Yu. Mozolas wages for those three days when he was kept in the preliminary prison. It was a liberal proposition, since the prosecutors office might subtract from the compensation the wear of torture tools.
The court met the demands of left-wing parties.
The court permitted the left-wing parties to conduct the meeting devoted to 1 May.