MENU

Similar articles

2020: There was no worse year in the realm of human rights after the Revolution of DignityBandera. An Invitation to a Calmer ConversationInvestigation of individual terrorist crimesA brief description of the KHPG strategic litigations in July–December 2020The practice of application of Article 111 of the Criminal Code of UkraineMPs challenged to fight Russian repression by adopting a Ukrainian political prisonerExpert opinion (Amicus Curiae) on the application and interpretation of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in criminal proceeding № 52017000000000361Russia could kill Crimean Tatar political prisoner imprisoned for civic activismRussia sentences 19 men to over 300 years’ imprisonment without any crime‘More doubts than evidence’ in child murder case that triggered shocking Loshchynivka anti-Roma riotEmpty promises from Ukraine’s leaders as release of Kremlin’s hostages ‘buried’Russia uses dodgy ‘secret witness’ to fabricate proof in trial of Crimean Tatar political prisonersA brief description of the KHPG strategic litigations in January – June 2020Deportation of Crimean Tatar and other Ukrainian political prisoners to prisons in Russia is a war crimeThe price of PACE capitulation to Russia: Soaring number of Crimean Tatar and other Ukrainian political prisonersUkraine was supposed to help Russia persecute Crimean Tatar leader Mustafa DzhemilevEx-Kremlin hostage Sentsov calls out Zelensky over flagrant violations in Sheremet caseZelensky’s proposed ‘reform’ of the Security Service fails badly on both reform and human rightsPeople from “different planets”. Could a pastor be a killer?Radical shift in high-profile charges over killing of journalist Pavel Sheremet in Ukraine

Haste (and the Verkhovna Rada) vs. the Right to a Fair Trial

09.04.2011 | www.pravda.com.ua

 

On Friday the Verkhovna Rada passed a draft law allowing for limitation on the time frame for a person accused to read the material of his or her case. The bill received 263 votes.

Up till now there was no restriction in law on the time needed for the person and their lawyer to familiarize themselves with the material.

The new law, if it comes into force, will allow the investigator or the Prosecutor to make the relevant application to the court if they deem the accused and their lawyer to be dragging out the process.  The judge may establish a time limit. After this has elapsed, the accused will be considered to have become fully familiar with the material whether or not this is actually the case. The Prosecutor, the accused or their lawyer would have three days to appeal against such a court ruling.

The deputies did not vote for the amendment which stipulated that the law could not be applied to those persons facing charges who have already begun reading their files.  This, obviously, includes the many opposition politicians, most prominently Yulia Tymoshenko, whose criminal charges have led to many statements of concern both within Ukraine and abroad.

Deputies from the opposition denounced the law as a violation of the Constitution. According to Yury Karamzin from Our Ukraine – People’s Self-Defence, the figure of 263 votes was reached despite there being only 72 members of the ruling majority in parliament.

From a report at http://pravda.com.ua/news/2011/04/8/6089083/

 Share this