Similar articles

Efforts likely to discredit civic activists and journalistsNGOs told to “explain themselves” – harassment or idiocy?SBU puts pressure on activists speaking out against controversial higher education lawSBU continues its “talks” with civic activistsSBU says questioning of civic activists was lawfulSBU once again sniffing around a civic organizationThe Security Service has no interest in democracy ...SBU and democratic valuesSBU checks cooperation between International Renaissance Foundation and civic organizationUkrainians forced to take Russian citizenship, or lose their homes in occupied Crimea Moscow’s proxy ‘republics’ announce that Donbas is and always was ‘Russian’Head of Ukraine’s Constitutional Court concealed illegal purchase of land in Russian-occupied CrimeaAccountability for Crimes Committed in Eastern Ukraine: Q&A on FIDH-KHPG’s Article 15 Communication to the ICCHow post-election protests are creating a new BelarusTortured and jailed or killed for the Ukrainian Flag and for supporting Ukraine in occupied DonbasPoliticized Polish judicial body illegally rubberstamps unfair presidential electionsПраво на охорону здоров’я у в’язницях протягом пандемії COVID-19Ukrainians’ tolerance towards unlawful violence is increasing – human rights protectorsCOVID-19 crisis threatens democracy, leading world figures warn61-year-old Crimean activist jailed for his pro-Ukraine views to go on trial in Russia

Ever fewer Ukrainians believe they have any influence

21.08.2013 |

The percentage of Ukrainians who believe that they can have any impact on the authorities is falling rapidly.  Interestingly while less and less people believe that demonstrations and rallies can help, more are pinning their hopes on civic organizations.

According to a survey carried out by the Democratic Initiatives Foundation and the Razumkov Centre, 41% of the public believe that ordinary citizens can have no impact on decision-making.

DIF Director, Iryna Bekeshkina pointed out in an interview to the weekly Dzerkalo Tyzhnya that this figure is on the increase.  In 2007, for example, only 28% believed they could have no impact.

Of existing mechanisms giving ordinary citizens the chance to have impact on specific decisions of the authorities, first place was taken by presidential elections (according to 31% of the respondents) and parliamentary elections (30%).

Ms Bekeshkina notes that this is an important point. “Effectively people, and then only a third, see two mechanisms alone – presidential and parliamentary elections. In 2007 there were three priorities – besides those, there were also rallies and demonstrations, with 21% of the population considering them to be effective.  Now there is much less faith in them – 15%”.

Involvement in political parties was seen as effective by 7% of the respondents; in civic organizations – 9%; writing to MPs or Mayors and local council deputies – 7%.  Taking the authorities to court was seen as effective by only 5% of those surveyed.

Iryna Bekeshkina notes that people do not see any possibility for them to have impact on the authorities. Possibly for this reason, there is a growing hope that civic organizations can help.

“Civic organizations as a whole enjoy the trust of 38% of the population. There is not one politician or state bodies trusted that much. In May this year trust in civic organizations for the first time outweighed distrust. It is also growing to the media, and falling towards state bodies. “

 Share this