MENU

Similar articles

Mounting Soviet-style jamming of independent media & hate speech in Russian-occupied CrimeaInternet providers forced to conceal total FSB surveillance in occupied Crimea & RussiaArmed searches & jail for deleted reposts to silence protest in Russian-occupied CrimeaCrimean Tatar activist jailed for video posted 7 years ago in new wave of repressionCrimean Tatar activist abducted by masked men from outside courtLast jailed Crimean Tatar activist freed, repression continuesRussian TV shows fake ’anti-terror operation’ to hide arrests of Crimean Tatar activistsNew Mass Detention in Russian-occupied CrimeaEnemy No. 1 for Exposing Lawlessness & Repression in Russian-occupied CrimeaRussia resorts to open terrorization of lawyers & their families in occupied CrimeaRussian FSB stage abduction to deprive Crimean Tatar leader of his lawyerRussia prepares new criminal charges as Crimean Tatar leader refuses to be silencedClosed ‘court’ in Russian-occupied Crimea moves to strip Crimean Tatar leader of his lawyerUmerov Released: Only Russia’s Persecution Showed PathologyPro-Kremlin Media Lies as International Pressure Mounts to Free UmerovRussia steps up torture of Crimean Tatar leader Ilmi Umerov amid protest over return of punitive psychiatryPunitive Psychiatry against Crimean Tatar leader for insisting Russia must leave CrimeaCrimean Tatar Mejlis Leader Arrested on ‘Extremism’ ChargesRussia bans Mejlis, declares war on Crimean Tatar people while the West watchesSanctions, not words, needed over extrajudicial criminalization of the Crimean Tatar Mejlis

New Russian law could cut Crimea off from Ukrainian and global Internet

15.04.2019
Halya Coynash

Russian-occupied Crimea could find itself totally cut off from the global Internet according to a bill which was adopted in its second reading on 11 April and has every chance of coming into force this year. Although the global Internet would purportedly only be blocked in case of a threat to Russia or if the Russian Internet was blocked from abroad, there is no clarity as to what would be deemed to constitute such a threat. 

The ‘Internet isolation’ bill was officially proposed by Andrei Klishas, a Russian senator who has been under US and EU sanctions since 2014 for his active support of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.  The bill prompted protests in several Russian cities on 10 March this year, with the march in Moscow large by Russian standards. The second reading has still gone ahead and there seems little chance that Russia’s leadership, which is doubtless behind the bill, will retreat.  Why would they, when the legislation provides another potent weapon against freedom of speech and access to information that the authorities want concealed?

The bill proposes the creation of an autonomous Russian segment of the Internet, which could be cut off from the Worldwide Web.  All Russian providers will be forced, at their own expense, to install the technical means for controlling traffic on their network.  While they will have to fork out the money for this, it will be Roskomnadzor, Russia’s effective censor, that will exercise such control.  Roskomnadzor will be able to block or unblock Internet sites, which at the moment the provider has to be ordered to do.

In the event of some undefined ‘threat’, the Russian authorities will be able to use such technical means to effectively isolate the Russian Internet, allowing in only those parts of the global Internet that they consider necessary.

Russia either closed or took over Ukrainian media after its invasion and annexation of Crimea, and it has persecuted both journalists and civic journalists for expressing opinions not to its liking and / or reporting on repression under Russian occupation.  The Crimean Human Rights Group has long reported on the widespread blocking of individual Ukrainian websites and media, and it has roundly condemned a bill which could, it says, impose “global censorship of the Internet in Crimea”.

The bill increases the already substantial (and repressive) role played by Roskomnadzor and the scope for the authorities to impose an Iron Curtain yet again on information from abroad. Since the bill in its present form does not spell out what will constitute sufficient threats to Russia’s infrastructure for such a wall to be lowered, there cannot be any real protection against abuse of the new restrictive powers that it envisages.

 

 Share this