Similar articles

Crimean Tatars sentenced to 12 and 17 years on ‘terrorist charges’ without being accused of a crimeFive Crimean Tatars sentenced to 68 years for peacefully practising their faith in Russian-occupied CrimeaDangerously ill political prisoner gets limited treatment. Torture in Crimean prison continuesFirst Russia came for the journalists. and now it"s hiding their trials Russia imprisons rights activists for ‘terrorism’ & terrorize their children Exposing the ‘experts" who secretly help to imprison Crimean and Russian political prisoners Crimean Tatar political prisoners illegally taken to Russia in appalling torture conditions PACE finalizes capitulation to Russia, while listing all reasons why this is appeasement Crimean Tatar political prisoner ‘retried’ until Russia’s FSB got the sentence they wantedCrimean Tatars sentenced to 18, 17 and 13 years for discussing their faith and Russian persecution Mass detention of Crimean Tatars travelling to political trial in Russia Next, Russia will come for the children The childhood Russia ended in 2020 with machine guns and arrests Russia begins its most repressive trial of Crimean Tatar journalists and activistsRussia seeks to imprison three Crimean Tatars for 50 years on thought crime chargesRussia’s Show Trial must go on, however many Crimean Tatar political prisoners it killsBrutal torture of gravely ill Crimean Tatar political prisonerRussia prevents jailed Crimean Tatar activists facing 20-year sentences from learning what they’re charged withRussia could kill Crimean Tatar political prisoner imprisoned for civic activismUkraine arrests Crimean turncoat implicated in persecution of Crimean Tatars

Ukraine may extradite Kyrgyz man facing the same flawed charges as Russia’s Ukrainian political prisoners

Halya Coynash

Makhmudzhon Kholdarov has been detained in Ukraine and could be extradited to the former Soviet republic of Kyrgyzstan where he would face a long prison sentence for his religious beliefs. Ukraine’s collaboration with the Kyrgyzstan authorities in this case would be especially incomprehensible as Kholdarov is accused of the same involvement in the peaceful pan-Islamist Hizb ut-Tahrir movement as around 55 Ukrainian political prisoners arrested by the FSB in Russian-occupied Crimea.

41-year-old Kholdarov was detained after arriving from Turkey at Odesa Airport on 13 August because of an Interpol Red Notice.  This was issued because the Kyrgyzstan authorities claim Kholdarov has been hiding from imprisonment since 2016, and only obliges Ukraine to provisionally detain him and examine whether there are grounds for extradition.

Although Kholdarov is ostensibly charged over having been in hiding from July 2016, his lawyer Andriy Leshchenko points out that he was initially charged with supposed ‘religious extremism’ in connection with his involvement in Hizb ut-Tahrir.  Leshchenko has examined Kholdarov’s documents which he says prove that during the relevant period from 2016, he was not only openly at liberty, but even lodged a complaint himself with the prosecutor’s office over an unwarranted search of his home.  This is hardly something a person in hiding would do.

The charge of hiding from justice is therefore not justified.  It also ignores the key fact that the real reason for the original prosecution was Kholdarov’s involvement in Hizb ut-Tahrir. That movement may be considered ‘religious extremism’ in Kyrgyzstan, but it is perfectly legal in Ukraine.  The Odesa publication Dumskaya points out that Article 557 of the Ukraine’s Criminal Procedure Code expressly prohibits any form of international legal assistance in cases where the foreign state wishes to prosecute for actions which are not a crime in Ukraine.

Leshchenko accuses the Ukrainian authorities of double standards.  While, on the one hand, they are indignant over Russia’s persecution of Crimean Tatars and other Ukrainian Muslims on charges of alleged involvement in Hizb ut-Tahrir, they are willing to consider extraditing people to countries where they are persecuted for their links with the movement.  He believes that a common and consistent policy needs to be drawn up at the level of the Prosecutor General’s Office, the Migration Service and other authorities.

While Kyrgyzstan accuses members of Hizb ut-Tahrir of ‘religious extremism’, Russia has gone much further and labelled a movement which is not known to have committed any act of terrorism anywhere in the world ‘terrorist’.   The Memorial Human Rights Centre has condemned the relevant 2003 Supreme Court judgement as totally unwarranted, and Memorial expert Vitaly Ponomaryov believes the judgement was probably aimed at giving the Russian authorities grounds for extraditing Uzbeks seeking asylum back to Uzbekistan although they were facing persecution for their religious beliefs. There is indirect confirmation of this in the fact that for the first ten years after the Supreme Court judgement, prosecutions seldom resulted in prison sentences.  This changed dramatically in 2014, with men now facing sentences of up to life imprisonment merely for discussing their religious views.  The prosecutions have also proved a source of promotion and / or bonuses for the FSB, who regularly concoct cases out of nothing, using dodgy ‘expert’ assessments and secret witnesses to make up for the lack of any evidence.

The situation is particularly shocking in occupied Crimea since Russia has no right to be applying its legislation on occupied territory and Hizb ut-Tahrir is legal in Ukraine. As mentioned, there are now 55 Crimean Muslims either serving huge sentences or awaiting ‘trial’, with an ever-increasing number of them civic journalists or activists who have evidently been targeted to silence them.

See: Russia uses wholesale arrests to try to crush Crimean Tatar human rights movement

comments: 0     
In order to post comments, you need tosign up and/or log in
 Share this