MENU
Documenting
war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Election of Ukrainian Judge to the European Court: are we entertaining or irritating Europe?So what does the European Court of Human Rights mean for Ukraine?Appeal to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of EuropeWhy Ukrainian civic society wants no more conflict of interestsUkraine’s new European Court Judge – politician, public official or lawyer?PACE decides not to annul Ukrainian delegation’s credentialsStrasbourg issues opinion regarding the dispute over Ukraine’s Judge to the European CourtPACE to decide on European Court Judge from UkraineIntrigue remains yet there is a choiceWarmest congratulations to Anna Yudkivska, newly elected European Court Judge!Interview with Anna Yudkivska, newly-elected European Court of Human Rights JudgeRussia’s supreme court rejects proof of innocence in favour of tortured-out ‘confession’ from Ukrainian human rights defender and POWRussia uses Siberia for maximum vengeance against imprisoned Crimean Tatar journalist Remzi Bekirov and his family ICC issues arrest warrants over Russia’s bombing of Ukraine’s civilian infrastructure as war crimes and a crime against humanityCrimean Solidarity journalist and activists arrested, their families terrorized, in new Russian offensive against Crimean Tatars Oleg Orlov, renowned human rights defender and Memorial Co-Chair, sentenced to 2.5 years for condemning Russia’s war against Ukraine Sentenced to 17 years in Siberia for opposing Russia's invasion and affirming that Crimea is Ukraine Son of Crimean Tatar political prisoner dies, deprived by Russia of his father in life and in deathYour families will suffer too: No limits to Russia’s persecution of Crimean Tatars and other Ukrainians Renowned Crimean Tatar lawyer detained and prosecuted for informing of illegal conscription into Russian army

Unresolved situation with Ukraine’s ECHR Judge is harming the country’s reputation

05.05.2009   
The ongoing difficulties in resolving the question of candidates for post of European Court of Human Rights Judge only confirm the stand taken by human rights groups to keep politics out of choice of Judge for this crucial post

On Monday the head of Ukraine’s delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Ivan Polesku told journalists that PACE could take away Ukraine’s right to vote if the situation over candidates for post of European Court of Human Rights Judge from Ukraine is not resolved. There are effectively two candidate lists with one difference.

Roman Romanov, Director of the “Rule of Law” Programme for the International Renaissance Foundation believes that PACE does not want to create a precedent with other countries also recalling their candidate lists. “It is not so much the powers of the Ukrainian delegation that has become hostage to this situation, but Ukraine’s international reputation. It has demonstrated inability to even use its right to nominate candidates to the European Court”, he told a Deutsche Welle reporter.

The original candidate list included National Deputy Serhiy Holovaty. Mr Holovaty, who is well-known in Strasbourg, changed political factions during the tumultuous events following President Yushchenko’s first Decree dissolving parliament in April 2007.

His political affiliations were on no concern to the human rights groups which in August and September that year began calling on PACE to not elect a politician as Ukraine’s Judge to the European Court. Especially given the degree of politicization of the Ukrainian judiciary, and constant pressure on it from politicians, it seemed highly desirable – and still does – to avoid any suggestion of political engagement from the Judge in Strasbourg.

Whether our arguments would have been heeded we will never know, since the situation changed radically on 14 September 2007 when President Yushchenko issued a Decree creating a new selection committee, claiming irregularities in the previous one. This was probably viewed with concern in Strasbourg, especially given the antagonism between the President and Serhiy Holovaty following the events of April 2007.

The new list of three candidates, which PACE refused to accept, differed in one respect: Mr Holovaty was replaced by Stanislav Shevchuk.

In the second half of 2008 the Court asked Ukraine to put forward a candidate for ad hoc Judge from Ukraine according to established procedure, in order to ensure review of cases against Ukraine until the election of a permanent judge.  Stanislav Shevchuk was proposed, and he commenced his duties in January 2009. The problem is that ad hoc is not the same as permanent, and it would be a breach of the norms established by the Convention, as well as PACE regulations, if he took over the post on a permanent basis.

Roman Romanov in the same interview said that he believes the Council of Europe should either choose one of the lists, or agree to the compromise offered by the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and recognize the country’s right to submit and recall candidates for international structures. He is making no predictions as to how long this will all last.

Please see “So what does the European Court of Human Rights mean for Ukraine?” http://khpg.org.ua/en/index.php?id=1190626393 and the appeal to PACE here

http://khpg.org.ua/en/index.php?id=1190323237

 Share this