MENU
Documenting
war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

10 years since the apartment bombings – 10 years of official disinformationWhole family with three children among those burned to death in Russian drone attack on Kharkiv Russia stages mass raids on Nobel Peace Prize laureate, brings criminal charges against Memorial Head for condemning its war against UkraineCrimean Tatar pensioner detained for calling Russia a fascist state on Facebook “He lay on the sidewalk, naming towns and cities in Ukraine”. A digest of anti-war activities in Russia, 23-29 JulyDirector of Amnesty International in Ukraine resigns in protest calling controversial Amnesty press release 'a tool of Russian propaganda’ Missing persons and enforced disappearances in the Kherson Region (24 February-24 June 2022)Russians name Stalin as the most ‘outstanding’ figure of all times PACE finalizes capitulation to Russia, while listing all reasons why this is appeasement Czech gets 3-year sentence for fighting in Donbas on side of Russian-controlled militantsModel concentration camp deployed in Russia for Putin regime’s rewriting of history’We’re Belarusians, Not A Russian Region’: Protests Take Aim At KremlinEmpty promises from Ukraine’s leaders as release of Kremlin’s hostages ‘buried’Russia is committing a war crime by deporting Ukrainians from occupied CrimeaCrimean Tatar political prisoners punished for refusing to take part in Russia’s ’forever Putin referendum’Ukraine may wake to find Zelensky has capitulated to Russia on water to CrimeaCrimean Tatar political prisoners face surreal terrorism charges that the prosecutor can’t explainUkrainian journalist in Russian-occupied Crimea fined for negative Facebook post about PutinMen on trial for Kharkiv bomb that killed a child & others on pro-Ukraine march could be handed over to RussiaHow can Russia deny responsibility for MH17 when it gave up Sentsov, others to get key witness out of Ukraine?

GQ removes article about Putin and apartment bombings from its Russian version

06.09.2009   
The article "Vladimir Putin’s Dark Rise to Power," by Scott Anderson investigates the terrorist acts in Russia at the end of the 1990s and is based on an interview with the former political prisoner and lawyer Mikhail Trepashkin

The article "Vladimir Putin’s Dark Rise to Power," by Scott Anderson, published in the American version of the magazine GQ, has been removed from the Russian version of the publication. The article investigates the terrorist acts in Russia at the end of the 1990s and is based on an interview with the former political prisoner and lawyer Mikhail Trepashkin, who once worked for the Federal Security Service [FSB] about the bombing of apartments in Moscow and Buynaksk.

On 23 July one of the top lawyers for the journal Jerry Berens sent the media holding a letter instructing the editors to not circulate the September issue of GQ with the article "Vladimir Putin’s Dark Rise to Power," in Russia, to not publish the article on the magazine website, and to not send copies of GQ to Russia or show it to Russian officials or journalists. It was also strictly forbidden to reprint the article in any publication of the media holding abroad, or any advertisement of the material in the journal itself.

 http://npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112530364

Why ’GQ’ Doesn’t Want Russians To Read Its Story  by David Folkenflik    September 4, 2009

For war journalist Scott Anderson, the most confounding part of his recent assignment for GQ magazine to explore the root of terrorist acts in Russia a decade ago wasn’t the suggestion of treachery and subterfuge he found.

Scott Anderson, a veteran war correspondent, says he’s disappointed GQ was frightened of circulating his story. "If you’re worried about repercussions and you bow to them, you’re basically surrendering to the other side."

Scott Anderson, a veteran war correspondent, says he’s disappointed GQ was frightened of circulating his story. "If you’re worried about repercussions and you bow to them, you’re basically surrendering to the other side."

It was the reception his story ultimately received in the United States.

"It was quite mysterious to me," Anderson says. "All of a sudden, it became clear that they were going to run the article but they were going to try to bury it under a rock as much as they possibly could."

Anderson, 50, is an accomplished reporter and novelist who has written previously for Harper’s Magazine, The New York Times Magazine, and Vanity Fair.

His investigative piece, published in the September American edition of GQ, challenges the official line on a series of bombings that killed hundreds of people in 1999 in Russia. It profiles a former KGB agent who spoke in great detail and on the record, at no small risk to himself. But instead of trumpeting his reporting, GQ’s corporate owners went to extraordinary lengths to try to ensure no Russians will ever see it.

A Management Memo

Conde Nast owns Vanity Fair and GQ as well as other publications, including Russian versions of GQ, Glamour, Tatler and Vogue. On July 23, Jerry S. Birenz, one of the company’s top lawyers, sent an e-mail memo to more than a dozen corporate executives and GQ editors.

"Conde Nast management has decided that the September issue of U.S. GQ magazine containing Scott Anderson’s article ’Vladimir Putin’s Dark Rise to Power’ should not be distributed in Russia," Birenz wrote.

He ordered that the article could not be posted to the magazine’s Web site. No copies of the American edition of the magazine could be sent to Russia or shown in any country to Russian government officials, journalists or advertisers. Additionally, the piece could not be published in other Conde Nast magazines abroad, nor publicized in any way.

It wasn’t just that there was no reference to Anderson’s piece on the cover of this month’s GQ, which featured a picture of Michael Jackson, a reference to tennis star Andy Roddick’s wife and a ranking of obnoxious colleges and top drinking cities. At this writing, I cannot find any reference to Anderson’s piece on the Internet.

The idea that information can be sequestered at a time when people can communicate instantly across oceans and continents may seem quaint. But in this instance, Conde Nast sought, against technology, logic and the thrust of its own article, to show deference in the presence of power.

Lawyers, executives and editors at Conde Nast and GQ did not respond to repeated requests for comment this week, and a spokesman ultimately declined on their behalf. But NPR has spoken to several people knowledgeable about the handling of Anderson’s piece. No issues have been raised to date about the article’s accuracy.

Then-acting Russian President Vladimir Putin signs autographs for Russian soldiers, east of the Chechen capital, Grozny, in January 2000. Putin, who took over office after President Boris Yeltsin resigned a day earlier, visited Russian forces in Chechnya to praise them for the campaign to crush separatist rebels.

AFP/Getty Images

Then-acting Russian President Vladimir Putin signs autographs for Russian soldiers, east of the Chechen capital, Grozny, in January 2000. Putin, who took over office after President Boris Yeltsin resigned a day earlier, visited Russian forces in Chechnya to praise them for the campaign to crush separatist rebels.

A Taboo Topic

To understand why Conde Nast might have reacted the way it did, it’s worth remembering the subject of the report — and the context in which it is now being written. Back in September 1999, Chechen terrorists were blamed for the attacks. The new prime minister, Vladimir Putin, emerged from the shadows and consolidated power. A crackdown ensued and a second war was launched against Chechnya. Putin took over from President Boris Yeltsin soon after the new year.

Chechen separatists have been known to commit deadly terrorist acts. Hundreds of Russians were killed after the takeover of a school in Beslan, Russia, while more than 100 other people died at a Moscow theater after a siege by Russian forces seeking to liberate it from Chechen gunmen.

But in today’s Russia, says Nina Ognianova, the program director for Europe and Central Asia at the Committee to Protect Journalists, the origin of the 1999 bombings is a taboo topic. And she says Russian authorities often turn up the heat on reporters who stray into unwelcome terrain.

"You can be sued for defamation — but you don’t even have to be sued. You can be audited," Ognianova says. "Politicized audits are a big hurdle for publications that dare to publish sensitive topics."

Those audits can focus on just about anything — including fire codes — that could paralyze a publication for months and send advertisers fleeing. That’s a consequential result for media companies that see foreign publications as increasingly important sources of revenue.

Journalists in Russia do fear retribution. Ognianova will be in Moscow on Sept. 15 to release a CPJ report about 17 journalists who have been killed since 2000. There have been convictions in only one case. One of the most prominent killings involved an American citizen of Russian descent who was editor of Forbes’ Russian-language magazine. And other critics have been silenced as well — most notably Alexander Litvinenko, another former KGB agent who claimed the Russian security services were tied to the terror attacks of 1999. Litvinenko died in England after being poisoned with radioactive polonium.

Professional Obligations

But Conde Nast’s Birenz did not raise security issues in his memo. And Anderson says he was not told of any safety matters by the company, just concerns of lawyers.

"If you’re worried about repercussions and you bow to them, you’re basically surrendering to the other side," Anderson says.

Jane Kirtley, an attorney who is a professor of media ethics and law at the University of Minnesota’s journalism school, says Conde Nast’s position makes no sense as a matter of pragmatism or principle.

"On one level, the smart thing is to stay in business and to stay in Russia, of course," Kirtley says. "But these stories will get out, they will get read in Russia. They’re being somewhat naive to believe that by limiting this to their American edition that somehow they’re preventing this from being read."

More important, she argues, is Conde Nast’s failure to live up to its professional obligations. "It goes with the territory of a news organization to speak for those who can’t speak — and to bear the consequences," she says.

’It’s Really Kind Of Sad’

Anderson had never hidden his subject from editors at GQ when they approached him to write something about Russia. His ensuing six-page story centered on Mikhail Trepashkin — a former KGB agent who had investigated the bombings. Trepashkin spoke at length about the inconsistencies in the case — and about possible links between the bombings and to the security agency that Putin once headed. Trepashkin himself has ties to a controversial Russian billionaire and recently spent several years in jail before being released. But Amnesty International said he had been treated unjustly and said the charges against him appeared to be politically motivated.

"Here’s a guy who spent four years in prison on a trumped-up, really rather silly charge (that) was a direct result of the investigative effort he’s made on these bombings," Anderson says. "Now he’s out — he’s certainly kind of walking around with a bullseye on his back — and yet is still willing to tell the story."

"I think it’s really kind of sad," Anderson says. "Here now is finally an outlet for this story to be told, and you do everything possible to throw a tarp over it."

GQ editors were also told not to promote the story, but in an act of quiet defiance, the magazine sought publicity for Anderson’s article from a few news outlets, including NPR’s All Things Considered.

Anderson was also asked to refuse to syndicate the article to any publications that appear in Russia once the rights revert back to him. He says he acknowledged the request, but told GQ he would refuse to honor it.

 The actual text would seem to be available here: http://tumblr.com/tagged/condenast

PLEASE PASS THIS ON.

 Do also read about the vengeance meted out against Mikhail Trepashkin at:

http://khpg.org.ua/en/index.php?id=1173304783

http://khpg.org.ua/en/index.php?id=1192142108  

(follow the links below – the story – and Trepashkin’s imprisonment – was long and sordid)

 

 Share this