MENU
Documenting
war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Mayor of Kharkiv sticks to his guns over journalists out of favourCommentary on the official letter of the Kharkiv City Council press service revoking Maria Spalek’s accreditationStatement from the Kharkiv journalist communityNew form of censorship in KharkivUkraine’s new Media Law is ‘soaked in censorship,’ expert saysRussian priest arrested and prosecuted for sermon opposing Russia’s war against Ukraine Russia proposes 15-year sentences and threatens 'treason charges' for telling the truth about its war crimes in UkraineOpen letter: Nestlé must immediately stop funding state media in BelarusCriminal proceedings under Article 111 of CC of Ukraine against the journalistsIn Memory: Zynoviy Antonyuk, Soviet Political Prisoner, Ukrainian Voice of ConscienceUkrainian lawmakers propose Russian-style Internet restrictions in the name of ‘national security’Russia: Telegram block leads to widespread assault on freedom of expression online (UPDATED)Росія: блокування Telegram є масштабною атакою на свободу вираження поглядів у ІнтернетіWhy block VKontakte when it provides evidence of Russian war crimes in Ukraine?Open Letter to the President of the Republic of Belarus, Alexander LukashenkaHuman Rights Violations in the so-called LNR and DNR: legislation and PracticeUkraine’s Government Proposes to Ban Import of ‘anti-Ukrainian’ Books from RussiaCall for Action to Free Luhansk Journalist held Hostage for 5 MonthsKuban ‘federalization’ activist to receive asylum in Ukraine26. Rights of prisoners

“The revoking of a Kharkiv correspondent’s accreditation is persecution for criticism”

24.02.2007    source: www.telekritika.kiev.ua
The Commission of Journalist Ethics deems the actions of the Kharkiv City Council press service in revoking a journalist’s accreditation to be an act of persecution for criticism and obstruction of journalists’ professional activities, and believes that the officials involved have exceeded the powers vested in them

The Commission of Journalist Ethics considers the revoking by the press service of the Kharkiv City Council of Maria Spalek’s accreditation to be an act of persecution for criticism and obstruction of her professional work. The Commission has made an appeal to the Prosecutor General and hopes that the latter will react to this incident.  Their statement, given below, was circulated on Friday 23 February.

Statement from the Commission on Journalist Ethics on unlawful interference in journalists’ activities

The Commission of Journalist Ethics deems the report by the press service of the Kharkiv City Council that it has revoked the accreditation of a journalist from the newspaper “Komersant – Ukraina” to be an act of persecution for criticism and obstruction of journalists’ professional activities. Officials of the said body of local self-government have exceeded the powers vested in them by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine.

The Constitution defines the role of bodies of local self-government as being “to independently resolve issues of local character”, and clearly outlines these issues. The comprehensive list most certainly does not contain issues regarding professional journalist ethics. Instead both the Constitution and laws set down a not exhaustive list of duties of bodies of local self-government on ensuring the right of citizens to information, namely:

  • to provide full and accurate information about its activities and decisions it has taken;
  • to ensure that journalists have free access to information;
  • to create special information services safeguarding access to information;
  • not putting any pressure on journalists nor interfering in their work;
  • providing accreditation for journalists and technical staff of media outlets and providing logistical backup for them to carry out their duties.

The procedure for accreditation and the revoking of such is regulated by a law which gives the only grounds being infringement of the procedure of access of journalists to premises, information and technical means of the authority or bodies of local self-government. An additional guarantee against the arbitrary rule of officials is also given in the fact that decisions on revoking accreditation are taken by the authority or body where the journalist has this accreditation.

Thus instead of carrying out their direct duty to ensure that journalists receive information about its activities and decisions taken by the Kharkiv City Council, instead of  providing logistical backup for journalists to carry out their duties (informing them about important measures and plans of the city council, providing copies of documents, full information about decisions being prepared or passed, safeguarding access of journalists to means of communication and to important sources of information), the press service has resorted to censorship, persecution and recriminations against journalists.

The Commission would welcome efforts by the official  of the press service of the Kharkiv City Council to involve specialists, including journalists, in preparing new regulations on the press service and procedure for accreditation of journalists and technical staff, since the present documents do not comply with either the Constitution and Ukrainian legislation, or international standards.

We are appealing to the Prosecutor General and look forward to hearing his response to the actions of public official of a body of local self-government which, in our view, contain features of the offence defined in Article 171 of the Criminal Code. (obstruction of journalists when carrying out their professional duties – translator)

Press history demonstrates that public officials who accuse journalists of special operations or information wars have grounds for fearing that their activities will be made public, while for a politician the reputation of being an “enemy of the press” spells political death.

 Share this