MENU
Documenting
war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

European Court of Human Rights halts extradition of Uzbek asylum seeker from RussiaRussian court rejects appeal against extradition of asylum seekerReal terrorists free to act while Russian FSB tortures political prisoners for 'good statistics' Russia uses Siberia for maximum vengeance against imprisoned Crimean Tatar journalist Remzi Bekirov and his family Russia frees criminals, sentences Crimean Tatar civic journalist to 11 years for moral integrityRussian justice: murderers pardoned for killing Ukrainians, Crimean Tatas sentenced to 17 years for defending political prisoners Crimean Tatar political prisoner: Russia’s 19-year sentence will not silence me, nor will such persecution break others Russian FSB seize Crimean Tatar family’s last son in new wave of terror against Crimean Solidarity activists13-year sentences for somebody else's conversation in cynical rehash of Russia's first attack on Crimean Tatar rights activists Russia sentences human rights defender to 14 years for helping political prisoners seek justice from ECHR Russia effectively sentences veteran Crimean Tatar activist to death for somebody else’s voice on a tapeRussia sentences blind and disabled Ukrainian to 17 years for discussing politics and religion Russia flouts UN order and begins carrying out death sentence against Crimean Tatar civic journalist Russia sentences Crimean Tatar political prisoner to 11 years for free thinking and civic activismUN Committee orders Russia to refrain from killing second Crimean Tatar political prisoner in one monthRussia terminates ‘trial’ of refugee it killed in occupied Crimea two years ago Prayers for Peace are Forbidden: a Digest of Russian ProtestsCourt sentences conscientious objector to a year in jailDeath sentence for reporting on Russian repression in occupied Crimea and chilling repeat of Stalin-era persecution Russia challenged over Crimean Tatar civic journalist’s death sentence

Russia’s Supreme Court cancels the expulsion of refugee to Uzbekistan

31.05.2008   
It is difficult to say what the outcome of the examination of this case would have been in the Supreme Court had it not been for the application by the European Court of Human Rights of Rule 39 halting Kurbanov’s extradition

On 28 May the Supreme Court considered the cassation appeal lodged by Uzbekistan national Dilshod Kurbanov and his lawyer against the ruling of the Tula Regional Court rurning down their appeals against the decision by the Russian Federation Prosecutor General to hand Kurbanov over to Uzbekistan to face criminal prosecution.

As reported here, on 22 April this year the European Court of Human Rights applied Rule 39 calling on Russia to halt the expulsion pending the Court’s review.  Fortunately, this time the Russian authorities did not ignore the Court’s instructions.

  Dilshod Kurbanov was detained in the Tula region on 30 May 2007 because the Uzbekistan law enforcement agencies had placed him on the wanted list.

  In June that year, from the SIZO [pre-trial detention centre], he sent an application for refugee status in the Russian Federation, since in Uzbekistan he is accused of taking part in prohibited Islamic organizations and movements which he categorically denies.

This application was rejected on 9 April 2008. It should be mentioned that the Federal Migration Service ignored the conclusions of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Mission in Russia who found that Kurbanov is in need of international protection and must not be returned to Uzbekistan

On 18 April 2008 the Tula Regional Court rejected Kurbanov’s appeal against the decision of the Russian Federation Prosecutor General (from 26 December 2007) to extradite him to his country of origin to face criminal charges of “encroachment on the constitutional system of the Republic of Uzbekistan” (Article 159) and “preparation or distribution of material containing a threat to public safety and order” (Article 244-1) of the Uzbekistan Criminal Code.

As already reported, the charges are the standard fare used in Uzbekistan against Muslims persecuted for their religious beliefs.

The Russian Federation Prosecutor General and Tula Regional Court saw fit to ignore the norms of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and the UN Convention against Torture prohibiting sending people back to countries where they could be subjected to torture.

It is important to note that the application to the European Court of Human Rights to apply Rule 39 was based on the well-founded fear that Kurbanov would face torture if returned

It is difficult to say what the outcome of the examination of this case would have been in the Supreme Court had it not been for Strasbourg. It is quite likely that the recent judgment of the European Court on the case of the “Ivanovo Uzbeks” played a role. Kurbanov’s defenders cited this case in which the systematic use of torture in Uzbekistan was testified to, as well as the unconvincing nature of assurances from the Uzbek authorities that international legal norms will be observed in relation to prisoners, these assurances accompanying every request for extradition.

 Share this