European Court finds Ukraine violated the right to life in its treatment of Olga Biliak
On 18 December the European Court of Human Rights notified of its chamber judgment in the case of Kats and Others v. Ukraine. It found that there had been violations of Article 2 (right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights because the Ukrainian authorities had failed to provide adequate medical care during Olga Biliaks pre-trial detention, and had not adequately investigated her death. It found that there had also been a violation of Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty and security. The applicants – Olgas parents and her son were awarded seven thousand Euros each in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
We have reported details of this case on a number of occasions, and it was highlighted in the last annual report. The following is from the report of the chamber judgment reported today.
Olga Biliak was arrested on 14 April 2003 and placed in pre-trial detention on suspicion of robbery; the criminal proceedings against her are still pending.
On her arrival at Kyiv City Pre-Trial Detention Centre no. 13 (“SIZO”), she was examined by a doctor who found her to be generally healthy. However, throughout her detention she suffered from various chronic illnesses such as an ulcer, bronchitis, pyelonephritis and other conditions which, exacerbated by her HIV infection, required constant medical supervision and appropriate treatment.
Her father submitted that he had sent a letter to the SIZO management on 26 September 2003 in which he requested that his daughter, HIV-positive since 1999, be hospitalised. However, the prison authorities refused to transfer her to a specialist hospital and failed to move her to the SIZOs medical wing. On 13 and 19 January 2004 the prosecution authorities also refused requests for her to be released, without addressing her health issues.
According to entries in Olga Biliaks diary, her health started to seriously deteriorate in December 2003; she developed serious respiratory problems, had a very high temperature and rapid weight loss. She was given pills to reduce her temperature. At the beginning of January 2004 she complained to doctors of stomach pain and vomiting and was diagnosed with chronic gastritis.
On 21 January 2004 she was examined by a cardiologist, a psychiatrist and the head of the prisons medical board. She had an X-ray and a blood test and was prescribed with anti-inflammatory tablets, light tranquilisers and antibiotics. The authorities claimed that it was at this point that they suspected she was HIV-positive. The next day the SIZO Governor requested the investigative authorities to consider releasing her on medical grounds.
On 29 January 2004 the district police department ordered Olga Biliaks release. That decision took until 2 February 2004 to process and, in the meantime on 1 February 2004, she died. The autopsy report noted that she had died of HIV-related illnesses, in particular advanced purulent pneumonia.
Decision of the Court
Article 2: Concerning Olga Biliaks right to life
The Court noted that, in view of the letter sent to the SIZO by Olga Biliaks father, the prison authorities should have been aware of Olga Biliaks HIV status at least as far back as September 2003. Given the vulnerability of those who were HIV-positive to other serious diseases, the Court found that Olga Biliak, refused access to a specialist hospital or SIZOs medical wing, had been provided with a striking lack of medical attention to her health problems. Indeed, although she had been suffering from numerous serious diseases, her treatment had been very basic.
Furthermore, even though her health had seriously deteriorated in December 2003 and January 2004, a fact not contested by the Government, it had not been until 21 January 2004 that a more in-depth diagnosis of her state of health had been made. Even after 22 January 2004, when the management of the SIZO had acknowledged the need for her to be admitted to hospital and requested the investigating authorities authorisation to release her on medical grounds, she had remained in a SIZO cell.
Moreover, the prison managements application for her urgent release had only been accepted after seven days and the decision to release her had then been processed with a four-day delay, during which time she had already died.
Lastly, the Court noted that the Government had not contested the accuracy of the report of 17 November 2006 which had concluded that inadequate medical assistance during Olga Biliaks detention had indirectly caused her death; nor had the Government produced any other medical evidence to refute that conclusion.
Accordingly, the Court concluded that there had been a violation of Article 2 on account of the Ukrainian authorities failure to protect Olga Biliaks right to life.
Concerning the investigation
The Court noted that the investigation was still pending even after four years and nine months. During that time the domestic courts had remitted the case for further investigation on several occasions with detailed instructions as to what evidence should be obtained and what circumstances should be established concerning Olga Biliaks death. Those instructions have, however, to date still not been fully complied with. In the absence of evidence from those additional inquiries, the decisions not to bring criminal proceedings, strikingly terse, had been limited to finding that Olga Biliaks death had not been caused by violence or medical negligence. Indeed, the investigation authorities have never properly addressed the main issue of the applicants complaints, namely the quality of the medical treatment provided in view of the diseases with which their relative had been diagnosed. Finally, denied access to the case file and never informed or consulted about any proposed evidence or witnesses, the applicants, who have no formal status in the proceedings, have been to a large extent excluded from the investigation.
The Court therefore concluded that Ukraine had failed to conduct an effective and independent investigation into Olga Biliaks death, in further violation of Article 2.
Article 5 § 1
The Court observed that under Article 165-1 of the Ukrainian Code of Criminal Procedure a detained person should immediately be informed of a decision concerning their release. Furthermore, Article 20 of the Pre-trial Detention Act provided that management of detention centres were obliged, on receipt of a release order, to immediately discharge a detainee. It was not in dispute that none of the above had been done in the applicants case and the Court therefore found that Olga Biliaks detention from 29 January to 1 February 2004 had been unlawful, in violation of Article 5 § 1.
Articles 3 and 13
Given its findings under Article 2, the Court did not consider it necessary to examine the complaints under Articles 3 and 13.