MENU
Documenting
war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

War against Independent Culture: a Digest of Russian Protests‘War is Death’: a Digest of Russian ProtestsTwo years of open attack on Crimean Tatars, with even political prisoners' families and lawyers jailed Defender of Crimean Tatar political prisoners gets 6 years for posts spelling out Russia's war crimes in UkraineDefender of Crimean Tatar political prisoners faces 7-year sentence for posts against Russia’s war against UkraineBlind and disabled Ukrainian political prisoner hospitalized, delaying Russia’s attempt to sentence him to 18 years ‘Cities speak’ — Digest of Russian ProtestsPoetry and Flowers Against the War – Digest of Russian ProtestsSpontaneous Memorial on Ukrainsky Boulevard – Digest of Russian ProtestsRussia sentences Crimean Solidarity activist to 17 years for defending political prisoners Russia seeks 18-year sentence in conveyor belt ‘trial’ of Crimean Tatar Crimean Solidarity activist Effective death sentence against veteran Crimean Tatar activist for opposing repression in Russian-occupied Crimea Patterns of Resistance are changing. A Digest of Protests in Russia (17-24 June 2022) Russia jeopardizes life of Crimean Tatar veteran activist imprisoned for defending political prisoners Imprisoned in occupied Crimea for opposing Russia’s war against Ukraine Crimean Tatar veteran activist faces 20 years in Russian prison for somebody else’s voice on a tape Russian Rule of Lawlessness in Occupied Crimea and DonbasRussian priest arrested and prosecuted for sermon opposing Russia’s war against Ukraine New attack on Crimean Tatar civic activists in Russian-occupied Crimea Russia ramps up toxic hate speech as it escalates its attack on Crimean Tatars

Russia: New encroachment on freedom to protest

15.01.2010   
Those planning “single-person pickets” may soon be obliged to submit an application to the authorities. Political activists would have to inform the authorities of their plan to hold such a picket no less than one working day before.

Those planning “single-person pickets” may soon be obliged to submit an application to the authorities. The radio station Echo Moskvy reports that a draft amendment to the law on gatherings, rallies and demonstrations has already been submitted to the State Duma on the initiative of the Moscow Regional Duma. Political activists would have to inform the authorities of their plan to hold such a picket no less than one working day before.

The explanatory note claims that there are situations when single pickets carry out acts of self-immolation or when they are attacked, while the local authorities, as a rule, do not even note about such protests being planned.

According to present legislation, it is not necessary to inform the authorities of a public measure involving only one person. This possibility has on many occasions been used by protesters when the local authorities banned mass events.

In fact, the police have still regularly detained those holding single person pickets, generally with the use of a provocateur, though also without.

This initiative regarding compulsory agreeing of single-person pickets is the second proposal to toughen legislation on public protest recently. On 28 December a draft law was tabled which envisages up to two years imprisonment for protesters who block roads.

Lev Ponomarev, Executive Director of the movement “For Human Rights”

One of the last possibilities for ordinary people to exercise their rights is being lost. If a person is linked with some political groups, he knows how to submit applications for a picket or rally. An ordinary person simply knows that at any moment he can go out on the street  and hold a single-person picket and nobody will detain him.

The fact that the Moscow Regional Duma claims to be acted in the interests of the picketers themselves is pure cynicism and shows yet again how removed quasi-elected regional parliaments are from the voters. In any normal country, the opponents of such parliamentarians would make the electorate aware of what the people they’d voted for were doing. If the voters went to the elections and voted with full responsibility, they wouldn’t vote for such swine.

 Share this