Ildar Dadin jail term upheld as Russia effectively criminalizes peaceful protest
01.04.16 | Halya Coynash
Stay silent. Tomorrow, when they come for you, the next person will say nothing
A Moscow court has rejected Ildar Dadin’s appeal against his three-year prison sentence under a draconian anti-protest law. The sentence was merely reduced by 6 months, with this still leaving it longer than the 2 years demanded by the prosecutor.
Judge Natalya Borisova from the Moscow City Court had rejected Dadin’s application to be present in court, and his final words were spoken by video link from the SIZO [remand prison].
“I am here because I live in accordance with my conscience”, he said. “Until you come out and state your position, you are an accomplice to fascism. If we don’t catch our officials in the act, if we allow executioners to kill people, we are responsible”. He called the sentence anti-constitutional, unlawful, unwarranted and criminal.
Dadin was represented by well-known lawyer Henry Reznik who pointed out that putting a peaceful demonstrator behind bars is a blow to the country’s prestige. “This case if of state importance. Will the state tolerate the peaceful assertion of views. There is no place for peaceful demonstrators behind bars. It is an affront to the law”.
Reznik also stressed that the new anti-protest law is in total conflict with Russia’s Constitution which guarantees freedom of peaceful assembly.
A new Article 212.1 of the Russian Criminal Code was introduced in July 2014. It is in grave breach of Russia’s Constitution and legislation, as well as the European Convention on Human Rights to which Russia is a party. It imposes double punishment for the same actions, first via administrative legislation, then criminal.
Most importantly, it effectively enables the criminalization of entirely peaceful protest. A sentence of up to 5 years is allowed if a court has issued three rulings on administrative offences within 180 days. It is quite standard in today’s Russia for police to detain people at entirely peaceful protests, with administrative protocols then drawn up and processed by the courts with no questions asked. It is also customary, and clearly happened in Dadin’s case, for the police to use provocateurs who walk up to a person holding a single-person picket and either cause trouble, or simply refuse to move away from the picketer until the police react. They normally do so very rapidly.
Dadin was accused of taking part in protests on Aug 6, Aug 23, Sept 13 and Dec 5 2014. He is the first victim of this new attack on the constitutionally guaranteed right of peaceful assembly, and it seems likely that the severe punishment was because of Ildar’s active support for Euromaidan and for Ukrainian political prisoners held in Russia.
During the trial both the investigators and the court made much of Dadin’s position on the so-called ‘Ukrainian question’, as well as his visits to Ukraine. He was supposed to have visited Kyiv three times “in order to gain skills in opposing the police”.
The investigators also tried to claim that Dadin had established contact with members of the ultra-nationalist Right Sector which Russia has systematically demonized since Euromaidan. The only ‘evidence’ for such claims was a ‘business card’ supposedly from Dmytro Yarosh, the head at the time of Right Sector. The card was almost certainly one of the humorous responses to Russia’s Foreign Ministry claims in April 2014 that Right Sector had been involved in a shootout near Kremlin-backed militant-controlled Sloviansk. The remarkably intact business card had purportedly been found in a totally gutted out car. This prompted a wave of hilarious Yarosh card memes on the Internet. The prosecution in Dadin’s case treated the card seriously, and claimed that Dadin had it for Yarosh’s contact details.
Ildar Dadin did indeed take part in Euromaidan as one of the self-defence activists. He was not engaged in any violence and mainly gave medical assistance to the wounded. Having returned to Russia, he was active in peaceful protests against Russia’s invasion of Crimea, military aggression in eastern Ukraine, and the ongoing imprisonment of Nadiya Savchenko and other Ukrainians held illegally by Russia.
There were about 100 people at the court. Some refused to leave the hall set aside for hearing the proceedings by video, and were beaten by court guards, seemingly because they refused to leave in protest.
In St. Petersburg, the authorities refused to allow a meeting in support of Dadin. A flash mob was attempted instead, with people standing holding photos of Ildar. Even that ended with at least three people detained.
Seeking Asylum In Ukraine, Russian Dissidents Get Cold Shoulder
How can Ukraine claim it’s safe to send opposition activists back to Russia?
Solidarity & asylum needed as Russians face persecution for opposing aggression against Ukraine
76-year-old Russian on trial for peaceful protest seeks political asylum in Ukraine
76-year-old Kremlin critic hospitalized on eve of sentence for peaceful protest
Russian court sentences Ildar Dadin to 3 years under new anti-protest law
Russian prosecutor demands 3 years for 75-year-old Kremlin critic
Pro-Putin ’activists’ attack 75-year-old Vladimir Ionov
75-year-old Russian activist could face 5 year sentence for peaceful protest
Russia criminalizes peaceful protest
This 75-year-old Russian pensioner may spend five years in prison for picketing
Two jailed in Moscow for protesting against Navalny convictions