login | registration | forgot the password
today 29.09.2016 18:20
(by Kyiv time)

navigation

Kharkiv Human Rights Group Social Networking



Russia continues to torment Ukrainian it drove half-crazy through torture

09.08.16 | Halya Coynash

Photo: Anton Naumlyuk

Ukraine has repeated its request for the extradition of Ukrainian political prisoners Stanislav Klykh and Mykola Karpyuk, amid increasing concern for Klykhs psychological state after torture in Russian captivity, and as Klykh faces cynical new charges for supposed contempt of court.

Russia is ignoring strong evidence of Klykhs disturbed psychological state after being subjected to torture and filled with psychotropic drugs during 10 months held incommunicado. It is refusing to order a proper psychiatric assessment, and has instead initiated criminal proceedings against Klykh for having allegedly insulted a prosecutor during a court hearing. These new charges have now been passed to a district court in Grozny, Chechnya.

Klykhs lawyer Marina Dubrovina explained to OVD-Info that the case is based on testimony from the prosecutor as supposed aggrieved party and witnesses, as well as a linguistic assessment of Klykhs words. The latter concludes that his words contain insults.

What was ignored is the opinion of many independent psychiatrists, such as Yury Savchenko, head of the Independent Psychiatric Association. Although no independent psychiatric assessment has been allowed, the experts believe that Klykhs moments of aggressions, emotional outbursts followed by periods of calm or even apathy suggest that he needs treatment.

You do not need to look far for likely reasons for Klykhs state. The now 42-year-old Ukrainian historian from Kyiv was seized after travelling to Russia to visit a woman friend in August 2014. He was illegally held in Russian captivity for 10 months without any access to a lawyer, or ability to communicate with anybody. There are medical records which substantiate Klykhs consistent allegations that during this period he was subjected to terrible torture and that he was plied with psychotropic drugs.

Dubrovina asked for a proper psychiatric assessment of her client in November, 2015. The report after this internal examination stated that Klykh had been examined by a psychiatrist and neurologist, that during the examination Klykh had made no complaints and that the medical specialists had found nothing wrong. Klykh later told her that a doctor had simply turned up, tapped a hammer on his knees, waved something around and left.

Dubrovina has recounted how on one occasion Klykh became hysterical, saying that hed been told his father had died. He calmed down only after Dubrovina managed to contact Klykhs mother who confirmed that his father was fine.

In January 2016 Klykhs behaviour became so disturbed that the court itself ordered that he undergo a psychiatric assessment. Since there were very strong grounds for finding psychological disturbance and suspecting that psychotropic drugs had, at some stage, been used, it is likely that there was a political decision to find nothing wrong with him. The prison personnel began forcing Klykh to take some unidentified drugs. These were probably heavy-duty tranquilizers, but his lawyers attempts to ascertain their nature were fruitless.

The new charges are offensively cynical, but change very little. If found guilty, Klykh would be fined, ordered to do compulsory work or imprisoned for up to four months. The proceedings were initiated by the same judge Vakhit Ismailov who appeared to be working for the prosecution during the trial of Klykh and Karpyuk and who has since initiateda serious attempt at reprisalsagainst Dubrovina and Karpyuks lawyer Dokka Itslayev.

Klykh and Mykola Karpyuk were sentenced in May 2016 to 20 and 22.5 years imprisonment, respectively, after a grossly falsified and cynical trial.

Russia claimed that Klykh and 53-year-old Karpyuk had (together with former Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseny Yatsenyuk and other prominent Ukrainian politicians) taken part in fighting in Chechnya 20 years ago and that during battles in Dec 1994 and Jan 1995 they had killed a number of Russian soldiers. Karpyuk was accused of creating and leading a band called Viking and Klykh of taking part in it. The case was entirely based on their confessions extracted during the 18 months that Karpyuk was held totally incommunicado and without proper lawyers, and 10 months in Klykhs case. This was backed by provably wrong testimony provided by a Ukrainian national Oleksandr Malofeyev already serving a 23-year sentence and directly dependent on the Russian prison authorities for life-saving medication.

The authoritative Memorial Human Rights Centre has followed both Russias wars in Chechnya and was therefore well-placed to assess the prosecutions case. In a four-part analysis, it demolished the entire indictment and left no doubt about the methods that had been used to extract insane confessions to heinous crimes supposedly committed together with Yatsenyuk & Co. The methods included threats to apply the same torture to Karpyuks wife and small child.

It was on the basis of this devastating assessment of the charges that in February 2016 Memorialdeclaredboth men political prisoners. It called the trial part of the unrelenting anti-Ukrainian campaign in the Russian state media and pronouncements from high-ranking Russian officials (see, for example, The Chilling side to Russias claims about Yatsenyuk as Chechnya fighter)

In its analysis, Memorial HRC demonstrated that the indictment contained fictitious crimes, and of the 30 Russian soldiers who really had died, 18 were killed in another place altogether, and a further eleven were not killed by gunfire, as the prosecution claimed. The list of factual mistakes is enormous, as is the amount of evidence that Klykh and Karpyuk had never set foot in Chechnya. It was all ignored.

More details about the Memorial analysis here:

Tortured for the Wrong Confessions: Russias Ukrainian Nationalist Charges Demolished

Memorial exposes Russias cynical con in trial of Ukrainian nationalists

Russias Ukrainian Nationalist Show Trial: No Bodies, No Proof, but Good Confessions

Klykh himself has addressed a plea to Ukraines government to speed up negotiations on securing the release (exchange) of all Ukrainians held illegally in Russian prisons. He asks also for help from the Ukrainian consulate in getting a television and is clearly facing an information vacuum. The letter was made public by Serhiy Petukhov from Ukraines Justice Ministry whowritesthat an information vacuum is one of the weapons used to put pressure on Ukrainians held in Russia. This makes the need for letters particularly acute.

Please write to Stanislav Klykh and to Mykola Karpyuk - even a single sentence or two will send an important message both to them, and to the Russian authorities, that they are not forgotten.

StanislavKlykh

364037, . , -, . - , 2. 1,

, (1974)

Mykola Karpyuk (in Russian Nikolai)

364037, . , -, . - , 2. 1,

, (1964)

If you are unable to write in Russian, the following would be quite sufficient:

, , .

(we wish you good health, courage and patience and hope that you will soon be released).

see also:
Sinister Methods Suspected for Obtaining Verdict in Russias Ukrainian Show Trial in Chechnya
Grave concerns for tortured Ukrainian hostage as Russia concocts new charges
Forget Minsk: Ukrainians get 22 & 20 years for Invented Crimes in Chechnya
Russias most monstrously falsified trial of Ukrainians ends as commissioned
Facts & alibis pitched against torture as Russias trial of Karpyuk & Klykh ends
Alibis as inadmissible evidence in Russias trial of tortured Ukrainians
Facts & Defence Denied in Russias Trial of Tortured Ukrainians
Russia uses Kadyrov’s thugs against defence witnesses in Ukrainian political trial
Russian court overrules historical facts in show trial of two Ukrainians
Russias Memorial demands release of tortured Ukrainian political prisoners
Russia to try Ukrainians tortured for surreal confessions in their absence