Human Rights in Ukraine. Website of the Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group
The right to life

In Memory of Georgy Gongadze, Pavel Sheremet and All Slain Journalists

Gongadze Sheremet

Traditional remembrance events on the anniversary of journalist Georgy Gongadze’s abduction and subsequent murder are especially poignant this year as they come just two months after the killing in Kyiv of Pavel Sheremet, the renowned Belarusian journalist and former prisoner of conscience. Ukraine’s media unions and other organizations have called on their colleagues to join in honouring their memory and that of all journalists who were killed while carrying out their work. 

There is hopefully no reason to suspect any officials or higher in Ukraine of involvement in Sheremet’s killing, or of unwillingness to carry out a proper investigation.  There does not however seem to be any major progress in finding his killer.  Sheremet, who was just 44, had resigned from Russian ORT two years earlier in protest at the virulent warmongering propaganda against Ukraine.  He was living permanently in Kyiv, together with his partner and owner of Ukrainska Pravda, Olena Prytula. 

Georgy Gongadze was a co-founder of Ukrainska Pravda, who wrote hard-hitting reports during the presidency of Leonid Kuchma which had by then become increasingly authoritarian and intolerant of independent media.  He was abducted by police officers on September 16, 2000, and his headless body was later found in a forest near Kyiv. 

On this anniversary, as on all others, there will doubtless be calls within Ukraine and abroad for those who ordered his killing to be identified and held to answer.  The calls are correct, but the chances of this ever happening seem miniscule.

The reasons have probably been clear from very early on.  Two months after Gongadze’s disappearance, a cassette made by Mykola Melnychenko, one of President Leonid Kuchma’s guards, was made public.  If genuine, and it is widely assumed to be so, this incriminates Kuchma, as well as the head of his administration Volodymyr Lytvyn.  They have always denied any involvement, as, of course, anybody in their position would.

After the so-called ‘Orange Revolution’, Viktor Yushchenko promised a real investigation into Gongadze’s murder.  This never happened, and in 2006 Yushchenko even awarded a state honour to Mykhailo Potebenko, the former Prosecutor General who had effectively blocked any investigation at the time.

In March 2008, three former police officers - Valentin Kostenko, Mykola Protasov and Oleksandr Popovych - were found guilty of abducting and killing Gongadze.  Protasov was sentenced to 13 years, the other two got 12-year sentences.

Their superior – ex-Police General Oleksy Pukach went into hiding, but was arrested in July 2009.  In January 2016, the Court of Appeal in Kyiv upheld Pukach’s life sentence almost 4 years after the initial sentence had been passed, and well over 15 years after the killing. 

The entire Pukach trial had been extremely long and all behind closed doors despite protest within Ukraine and abroad given the very serious grounds for suspecting that Gongadze’s killing had been ordered by people in high positions.

The investigators had found (controversially) that Pukach carried out the murder on instructions from Yury Kravchenko, the then Interior Minister who is officially recorded as having committed suicide (with two gunshot wounds to the head) in early 2005.

In his final words to the court, Pukach said that Kuchma and Lytvyn, who for some time during the trial had been parliamentary speaker, should have been on trial with him. He said that he had tried to tell all the truth, but that nobody had wanted to hear.

At the time, Valentina Telychenko, the lawyer representing Gongadze’s widow Miroslava Gongadze, told Ukrainska Pravda that she was delighted that the accusations had finally been heard by journalists. Unlike her, they had signed no undertaking to keep the court proceedings secret.  She asserts that in his pre-trial and court testimony, Pukach repeatedly spoke of Kuchma and Lytvyn, about where and when he met with Lytvyn, however that had never been used in the ‘investigation’ into who ordered the murder”. 

This investigation is, in theory, still continuing.

Much was made in early 2011 when criminal proceedings were initiated against Kuchma over the Gongadze case.  President Viktor Yanukovych was already under heavy criticism for violations of press freedom, as well as selective justice, and his people tried to tout the criminal proceedings as proof that it was Yanukovych, not his predecessor Viktor Yushchenko, who was willing to reveal the truth about the Gongadze killing.  Within months, however, the Constitutional Court had obligingly ruled that evidence could not be used that had not been legitimately obtained by an investigative body.  The stand that evidence illegally obtained cannot be used may well be justified in many situations.  Here, however, it eliminated Melnychenko’s tape which, if authentic, clearly contained vital information.

Journalists and other members of the public will hold the traditional remembrance gathering on Friday evening on Maidan Nezalezhnosti [Independence Square]. As well as the recent murder of Pavel Sheremet, the remembrance events are also taking place, as in the last 2 years, under the shadow of war.  During last year’s remembrance event on Maidan, the names were read out of 61 journalists who had died in the course of their work, as well as those of a number of journalists killed in Donbas, defending their country.  

Halya Coynash
Recommend this post

forgot the password




send me a new password