search  
print
19.11.2018

Statement of NGOs from different countries regarding the possible election of a Russian representative as a President of Interpol

   

In accordance with the INTERPOL Constitution, the President of the organisation must:

a) chair the meetings of the Assembly and the Executive Committee and manage the discussions;

(b) ensure that the activities of the Organisation are carried out in line with the decisions of the General Assembly and the Executive Committee;

(c) maintain, to the greatest possible extent, direct and permanent contacts with the General Secretary of the Organisation.

Thus, the General Secretariat of INTERPOL and other bodies will only be required to implement strategic decisions taken under the leadership of the President of the Organisation. The strategy of the organisation’s work will be formed and determined by the representative of the aggressor country, whose authorities:

– violate international agreements, brutally violate international law, have occupied the Crimea and conducted open military actions on the territory of other INTERPOL member countries, namely: Ukraine and Syria;

– through propaganda and with the use of intelligence services, interfere with the internal policies of democratic states;

– is disclosed in the use of chemical weapons in the territory of the United Kingdom, according to British officials, as well as the promotion of the use of chemical weapons in Syria;

– is guilty of crimes against humanity in relation to the Chechen people and is currently carrying out systematic crimes against the Crimean Tatar people;

– violate the basic principles of human rights and fundamental freedoms, persecute people for their convictions, fabricate numerous criminal cases against political opponents, opposition leaders, journalists, human rights defenders, and ordinary businessmen for the purpose of expropriating their property for the benefit of the oligarchic clans close to the authorities of Russia;

– actively provide financial and other support to the dictatorial authoritarian regimes of North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, and Iran;

– in violation of all international treaties and conventions, purposefully and methodically declare the possibility of a nuclear war and are actively preparing for it.

Currently, Russia and its allies, namely: Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, as well as Venezuela and Iran, are leaders in misusing INTERPOL mechanisms, including Red Notice and Diffusion requests for the purpose of politically motivated prosecution and national, religious, social and gender-related persecution. Thus, in spite of an active work aimed at preventing such misuse, it can be asserted with confidence that the database of the organisation includes several thousand people that follow authoritarian regimes, including the Russian Federation, in violation of Art. 3 of the INTERPOL Constitution. These are residents of the occupied Crimea and other regions of Ukraine, natives of Chechnya and other republics of the North Caucasus, human rights activists, opposition politicians and businessmen.

In addition, the INTERPOL list contains the names of many people who have been granted refugee status in relation to the state that is pursuing them. Frequently, these individuals remain on the INTERPOL list even after a refusal to extradite them has been issued. Due to this fact, they cannot cross the border or get a job. For over five years, human rights organisations, representatives of PACE, the European Parliament, the European Commission have been working on this problem. Due to the efforts of the international community, in November 2016, INTERPOL began the reform process. In particular, the Organisation has begun to apply (for the time being, inconsistently) the policy of protecting persons with refugee status. The procedures applied by the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files have become more transparent.

Over the past two years, INTERPOL has taken important steps to combat misuse of its mechanisms, and it is important to continue these reforms, improving the legislation of the Organisation. However, the Organisation is now facing the curtailing of previous positive initiatives. Instead of imposing restrictions on violating states (provided for by the INTERPOL legislation), now INTERPOL can be headed by a representative of Russia – one of the most principled violators of the Organisation’s rules.

If a representative of the Russian Federation is elected to the leading position in the organisation, the number of politically motivated prosecutions with the use of the INTERPOL mechanisms will only increase, as it is highly likely that the authorities of the Russian Federation would apply methods of blocking complaints regarding unlawful registration of the criminal record of prosecuted persons whose names have been included in the database of the organisation.

Even today, it can be argued that INTERPOL actually supports of the crimes against humanity in relation to the Chechen people exercised by the Russian authorities; it is due to the fact that the number of representatives of a small Chechen ethnic group in the organisation’s database is significantly greater than representatives of any other nations. Moreover, for this ethnic group, the organisation’s website provides special labels that indicate the ethnic origin of the prosecuted person.

The possibility that Russia would reissue requests for the pursuit of individuals who had been previously removed from the INTERPOL database due to violation of the organisation’s Constitution cannot be ignored. Thus, these individuals may be subjected to unlawful prosecution again.

In addition to the fact that INTERPOL can turn into an organisation that deals with the persecution of dissenters under the orders of dictatorial, authoritarian and totalitarian regimes, there is a direct threat that the organisation would be criminalised and its mechanisms could be used by international criminal structures. Thus, today, it is a well known fact that the leaders of the majority of Russian organised criminal groups (the so-called “Orekhovsky”, “Podolsky”, “Solntsevsky”, etc.) have become state figures, have been awarded state awards and granted the status of advisers or consultants in the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. Authorities of a number of countries, including the United States and Spain, accuse Russian politicians and businessmen, close to the authorities, including members of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, of involvement in the international organised crime. It cannot be ruled out that, under the leadership of the representative of the Russian Federation, INTERPOL could shift accents and close their eyes to Russian criminal groups due to their affiliation with the authorities. Also, it cannot be ruled out that, with the consent and approval of the organisation’s leadership, representatives of the criminal world could be able to become part of the very organisation and begin to exercise control over its activities.

It is yet to be known by who, how and for what purpose, the database of the organisation would be used. However, it is already a well-known fact that the security system of the database is provided by the infamous Kaspersky Lab – a Russian IT company controlled by the Russian FSB. If a representative of the Russian Federation is elected to the leading position in the organisation, it can be argued that the database of the organisation could be used in the interests of the regime of Putin and his satellites.

We must not forget that three SS generals: Reinhard Heydrich (1940-1942), Arthur Nebe (1942-1943), and Ernst Kaltenbrunner (1943-1945) were appointed consecutively to the post of the President of INTERPOL. We remember very well how the story ended.

We hereby call on the delegates of the countries participating in the 87th session of the General Assembly of INTERPOL to prevent the election of a representative of the Russian Federation Oleksandr Prokopchuk to the post of President of INTERPOL and to take all necessary measures to prevent the use of this reputable organisation, in violation of Art. 3 Constitution of INTERPOL, for prosecuting people within the framework of fabricated and politically motivated cases. It is important that the engagement of INTERPOL with Russia and other authoritarian regimes be ceased immediately. If the situation does not change now, it can become a serious challenge to humanity, which will entail a significant number of victims.

LIST OF SUBSCRIBERS:

1. Kharkiv human rights protection group / Харківська правозахисна група

2. Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union / Українська Гельсінська спілка з прав людини

3. Open Dialogue Foundation / Фундація «Відкритий діалог»

4. Center for Civil Liberties / Центр громадянських свобод

5. Humanitarian Studio “Khvylia” / Гуманітарна студія «Хвиля»

6. Anticorruption Action Center / Центр протидії корупції

7. Media Initiative for Human Rights / Медійна ініціатива за права людини

8. Centre for Global Studies ‘Strategy XXI’ / Центр глобалістики «Стратегія ХХІ»

9. Civic organization “Fairness corps” / Громадська організація «Корпус справедливості»

10. Human Rights Information Centre / Центр інформації про права людини

11. Center Eidos / Центр Ейдос

12. Center political studios / Центр політичних студій

13. Vostok-SOS (East-SOS) / Благодійний фонд «Восток-SOS»

14. Crimean Human Rights Group / Кримська правозахисна група

15. Pylyp Orlyk Institute for Democracy / Інститут демократії імені Пилипа Орлика

16. NGO “Transcarpathian community” / ГО «Закарпатська громада»

17. Democracy Monitor – Azerbaijan

18. CENLIBART – CENTRE SOUTIEN LIBERTE ART ET EXPRESSION DANS LES DICATATURES

19. Democracy For Azerbaijan – France

20. Media Center Amsterdam (Canal Turan)

21. Journalist Academy Latvia

22. Democratic Azerbaijan Movement

23. Azerbaijani Latvian Lawyers

24. Gazeta AIM Europa

25. Azadlig newspaper – Azerbaijan

26. Institute for Peace and Democracy – Azerbaijan/Netherlands

27. Kyiv Gender Studies Institute / Київський інститут гендерних досліджень

28. Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research / Український незалежний центр політичних досліджень

29. All-Ukrainian Association “Automaidan” / Всеукраїнське об’єднання «Автомайдан»

30. Eastern-Ukrainian Center for Civic Initiatives / Східноукраїнський центр громадських ініціатив

31. NGO “Choice” / Громадська організація «Вибір»

32. Luhansk oblast Human Rights Centre “Alternative” / Луганський обласний правозахисний центр «Альтернатива»

33. Cherkasy human right center / Громадська організація «Черкаський правозахисний центр»

34. ГО «Культурно-освітня фундація «Лібері Лібераті» (Донеччина, Краматорськ)

35. Migration Center of Azerbaijan (Germany)

36. ГО «Ініціатива Е+»

37. Ukraine Action (France)

38. Euro Asia News Media Group Journalsit Against Corruption

39. Благотворительный фонд «Артдача»

40. ВГО «Антикорупційний форум», Львівське обласне відділення

41. IPTG (Austria)

42. Made in Azerbaijan Page – Mahammad Mirzali, France

43. NGO «Ukraine needs you»

44. Peaceful future of Ukraine / Благодійний фонд «Мирне Майбутнє України»

45. NGO Volunteer Cherkashchiny / Громадська організація «Волонтер Черкащини»

46. Центр політико-правових реформ

47. Громадська Організація Рух «Визволення»

48. Monitoring Centre for Political Prisoners, Azerbaijan

49. Union for the freedom for political prisoners in Azerbaijan, Azerbaijan

50. Crimean Tatar Resource Center / Кримськотатарський Ресурсний Центр

51. Committee on the protection of human rights of the Crimean Tatar people / Комитет по защите прав крымскотатарского народа

52. Crimean Tatar Youth Center / Крымскотатарский Молодежный Центр

53. ГО «Асоціація Політичних Наук»

54. Центр української політики «Ексампей»

55. Всеукраїнське об’єднання медиків Майдану

Recommend this post
X




forgot the password

registration

X

X

send me a new password


on top