MENU
Documenting
war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Taras Zelenyak fined 4.5 thousand dollarsThe Taras Zelenyak case is, unfortunately, continuingCourt sends Taras Zelenyak case back to the prosecutorTaras Zelenyak: Verbal coating for a no less virtual crime (updated)Second court hearing in the Taras Zelenyak Case (updated)THE TARAS ZELENYAK CASE: AN ATTEMPT AT ANALYSISA VIRTUAL CRIMEIn defence of Taras Zelenyak and freedom of speech on the InternetRenowned Crimean Solidarity journalist convicted of 'abusing' freedom of mass information in Russian-occupied Crimea FSB violently detain renowned activist and Crimean Tatar National Assembly delegate Crimean blogger sentenced to 2.5 years for 'showing disrespect for Russia's military glory' Sentenced to 17 years in Siberia for opposing Russia's invasion and affirming that Crimea is Ukraine Armed raid and surreal charges in Russian attempt to silence renowned Crimean Tatar journalist and Crimean Solidarity coordinator Lutfiye Zutfiyeva Russia's armed terror against independent Crimean Tatar Muslim community hits resistance Renowned Crimean Tatar lawyer detained and prosecuted for informing of illegal conscription into Russian army Horrific sentences against Crimean Solidarity journalists for telling the world of Russia’s crimes in occupied Crimea Crimean Tatar journalist and activists face huge sentences in Russia’s retaliation for humiliating attack by Ukraine Unending imprisonment in reprisal for young Crimean Tatar’s refusal to take Russian citizenshipArmed searches and surreal charges against Crimean Tatar Imam for leading prayers in Russian-occupied Crimea Chilling déjà vu as Russia uses Crimean SMERSH to hunt down supporters of Ukraine in occupied Crimea

When they try you for your words

15.08.2007   
The Russian police are now using anti-extremist legislation against their critics

An artist from Syktyvkar (the Komi Republic) has been officially charged with inciting hatred towards the police. The local police did not appreciate criticism that the latter expressed on the Internet.

Human rights defenders maintain that the law enforcement officers are simply using the “anti-extremism law” for their own ends, while those really inciting inter-ethnic enmity via the Internet act with impunity and are flourishing.

Last Thursday the Syktyvkar Prosecutor charged Savva Terentyev under Article 282 § 1 of the RF Criminal Code (inciting hatred or enmity, as well as denigrating a person”). Terentyev could face anything from a fine of 200 thousand roubles to two years penal colony.

The unflattering remarks addressed at the work of the police were written in February on Live Journal. In his entry, Terentyev compared law enforcement officers with representatives of marginal youth elements and suggested a medieval way of exerting influence on police officers.

The police decided that they had been insulted and launched a criminal investigation, in the course of which they visited his home and removed his computer.

Savva Terentyev says that even if they impose a fine, he doesn’t have that sort of money. The blogger is also indignant as to the grounds for charging him since not one expert assessment has proven that he wrote the text.

There have been two court linguistic assessments made.  The first was not to the prosecutor’s liking, since the expert found that Terentyev had only expressed his opinion. The second was more obliging and found “social enmity” in the utterances. To establish authorship, the investigators used Terentyev’s school notebooks which he had blithely copied from textbooks, yet charges were laid on the basis of this.

Savva Terentyev is convinced that the police have blown up this case because the harsh words annoyed them. The Director of the Fund for the Defence of Glasnost Alexei Smirnov agrees that the police are pursuing their own ends and is outraged that a person is being tried for expressing his personal opinion, and on the Internet at that.

Meanwhile openly xenophobic publications appearing on the Internet are spreading like wildfire. One especially notorious case which has just made the headlines involves a video clip demonstrating the brutal killing of a person from Tajikistan and another from Dagestan, committed against the background of a flag with a swastika.

Svetlana Gannushkina, Director of the Civic Assistance Committee: is pessimistic:  “I doubt if anything will be done about it. The law enforcement agencies usually treat such cases with special care and try to avoid the defendants receiving punishment. This is encouraged today and nobody speaks out against it”.

Based on an article in Novye Izvestia www.newizv.ru

 Share this