MENU
Documenting
war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Verkhovna Rada refuses to support trial by juryAI: Parliament must strengthen safeguards against torture in new CPCParliament advised to revise draft Criminal Procedure CodeDeals with investigators – progress or grounds for corruption?Council of Europe concerned about ill-treatment by the police and detention conditionsUN report demolishes Russia’s attempts to blame Ukrainian POWs for its atrocities in Mariupol ICC issues arrest warrants over Russia’s bombing of Ukraine’s civilian infrastructure as war crimes and a crime against humanityRussia-Ukraine war: what does filtration mean?Russia abducts, tortures and ‘sentences’ disabled Ukrainian to 16 years on legally absurd charges Putin grants Russian citizenship to suspected Bosnian Serb war criminal, pardons serial killer to fight against UkraineConvicted killers that Putin pardoned and glorifies for fighting Russia’s war against Ukraine teach children about ‘courage’Dramatic twist in trial of ex-Berkut officer over savage torture of Maidan activists Ukrainian prisoner dies after savage beating by prison staff and refusal to provide medical care First sentences in Ukraine over mass murder of Maidan activists Russia passes insane sentences for ‘spying for Ukraine’ against Ukrainians it abducted from occupied Kherson and tortured Court in Russia imposes massive fine for criticizing Stalin and telling the truth about Soviet collaboration with Nazi Germany‘Ukrainians have a collective trauma’, — psychologist Alena HrybanovaUN dismisses Russia’s attempt to blame Ukraine for the deliberate killing of over 50 Ukrainian POWs at Olenivka ‘My three-year-old son says: Putin should be buried in his bunker — then there will be no war’In the shelter, my daughter cared for her toy

Forward to a jury system or back to people’s assessors?

24.01.2012    source: www.radiosvoboda.org
The draft Criminal Procedure Code envisages the appearance of jury assessors. The government claims that this is the first step towards creating a jury system in Ukraine. Experts are critical, predicting a return to the Soviet model of people’s assessors

The draft Criminal Procedure Code which the President has submitted for parliament’s consideration envisages the appearance of jury assessors. The government claims that this is the first step towards creating a jury system in Ukraine. Experts are critical, predicting a return to the Soviet model of people’s assessors.

The draft Code states that people suspected of committing particularly serious crimes will be able to demand that a court is appointed consisting of two professional judges and three «juror judges”. Candidates for the latter will be put forward by local communities.

The President of the Institute of Law Policy Mykola Onishchuk says that the model negates the very sense of a real jury. Those who earlier drew up the draft Criminal Procedure Code suggested that a jury, made up of six or twelve ordinary citizens would take decisions as to whether there had been a crime and whether the defendant was guilty.

Members of the government argue that the proposed model is merely the first stage towards a fully-fledged jury system. The chair of the parliamentary subcommittee on criminal procedure legislation, S. Oliynyk asserts that the institution is provided for in the new draft code in the form which is possible from the economic point of view.

However human right rights activists believe that the draft code effectively envisages a return to the Soviet system of court proceedings.

The Head of the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union, Arkady Bushchenko calls it an attempt to tell people that Ukraine has a developed democracy. He points out that a jury is a panel of jurors who determine whether a person is guilty.  This does not include judges. “Now this is a single panel. They’re not jurors, however they try to call them”, he says. He adds that the attempt to convince European experts that a jury system is being introduced has not worked. The experts who analyzed the draft code also noted that it does not envisage such an institution. 

 Share this