We are posting here the apology which the Daily Telegraph issued over their misleading report of 22 April. We are extremely grateful to the Press Complaints Commission for their kind assistance in resolving this dispute

The District Administrative Court in the Donetsk region on 10 June issued an important ruling in the ongoing struggle to force the State Department for the Execution of Sentences to stop concealing information of public importance. It found that the Head of the Department, Vasyl Koshchynets had behaved wrongfully by failing to provide information in the legally stipulated period on the mortality figures in the penal system.

Court finds that the Head of the State Department for the Execution of Sentences acting wrongfully by failing to provide information in the legally stipulated period on the mortality figures in the penal system

With newspapers fighting to be first in breaking a news story, the decision by Canada’s most authoritative paper the Globe and Mail to publish an article by Solzhenitsyn attacking attempts to have Holodomor recognized as an act of genocide two months after it appeared must raise eyebrows – and some hard-hitting questions

On a repulsive Hitler doll, fighting stereotypes and shoddy journalism and on some success in asserting our right to truthful information

Over the last two or three weeks we have gone on and on about one unspeakable monstrosity, namely, a Hitler doll or model. We are sincerely hoping to be able to leave this foul subject and get onto more important things, but first we have one big request. A lesson needs drumming in and your help is vital.

The Daily Mail has issued a correction of their article published on 23 April 2008 “The Adolf Hitler doll which comes with a change of clothes - and a spare head with a kind face”.

We are extremely grateful to Kristin Zeier, Editor of the English Page of Deutsche Welle for issuing an apology and removing misleading information from the DW site. We look forward to the Daily Mail’ and Daily Telegraph following this good example.

The four main sites which posted inaccurate and misleading information about a Hitler doll have now removed the offending material. We repeat our call for a public apology and our intention to approach the press complaints bodies if an apology is not forthcoming

On a Hitler doll / model, apologies for spreading misleading information from the BBC and calls on other media outlets to follow suit

Why is Deutsche Welle continuing to profoundly offend people in a country which as you are well aware has every reason to remember Nazism with pain and absolute abhorrence?

It is galling that you can buy the doll in one shop in Kyiv, as well as in England, the USA and other countries. However something else remains quite incomprehensible. How can you manufacture a sensation based on lies at the expense of a nation which suffered from fascists and butchers of all breeds?

As Victory Day approaches, we believe it fitting in remembrance of all victims of Nazism in Ukraine to take all measures to clear the Internet of profoundly offensive and misleading comments regarding Ukraine over the "Hitler doll"

We enclose sample letters to write to the media outlets who published inaccurate and misleading information over the "Hitler doll"

We warmly welcome the initiative taken by Trumpet.com in withdrawing their article about figurines of Hitler having arrived in Ukrainian shops іsince the "source material that the article was based on was both inaccurate and misleading”

Approach us when you are offered “sensational information” concerning Ukraine. We are NOT asking that you take our word for it. Quite the contrary – we would ask you to check all information and present differing points of view. This is what all of us, including your audiences, are entitled to expect.

They say that news travels fast. So, unfortunately, do lies. The speed with which the “story” described below reached quite different media outlets has made many people in Ukraine question whether it, so to speak, travelled, or was transported. Be that as it may, other questions also beg our consideration

The attack, unprecedented in scale, was first aimed at the Belarusian Service, but soon hit other sites also

(The twentieth century and the “war of memories”) An appeal from the International “Memorial” Society

After almost sixty years of a fierce information war, where the truth was constantly sacrificed to ideology, is it not time that we finally remove all protective glasses which allow us to see only a part of the picture?