war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Where is the Aarhus Convention?It’s our environment: on asserting the right to knowAccess to information is the first step towards effective democracyRussia’s reported mining of the Crimean Titanium factory 'could kill tens of thousands' Russia gave advance permission to not investigate its attack on Ukraine’s Kakhovska Dam 2,500 kms on Foot to Protest against the War. Anti-war Activities in Russia, 17-26 July 2022Russia has already greatly surpassed the Nazi Third Reich by insidiously launching missile and bomb attacks on UkraineDonbas militants seize Ukrainian teacher trying to help her ailing mother Russia finances war in Donbas, but ignores the environmental disaster its proxy ‘republics’ are causing UkraineNine former hostages to testify against ex-militant over torture at Donetsk Izolyatsia secret prisonRussian invaders accuse Ukraine of ‘ecocide’ for not providing occupied Crimea with water Russian proxy Donbas ‘republics’ criminalize ‘defamatory’ criticism on the InternetRussia forced to ‘change the status’ of occupied Crimea because of sanctions Criminal proceedings under Article 111 of CC of Ukraine against the journalistsTortured and jailed or killed for the Ukrainian Flag and for supporting Ukraine in occupied DonbasAccountability for international crimes committed in Ukraine between 2014–2018Russia refuses to allow Ukrainian political prisoner Kolchenko to complete his studiesNobody believes Ukrainian environmental activist’s death was suicide, so why was the investigation terminated?Crimean Chemical Disaster will happen again while Ukraine helps oligarch Firtash bypass sanctionsCrimea Chemical Disaster – Russia takes 2 weeks to evacuate children amid information vacuum

For Internal Use Only: Is Post-Chornobyl Ukraine Ready for Access to Environmental Information?

According to Article 19, Ukraine, the site of the worst environmental disaster in recent history, is still failing to protect the right of its citizens to access environmental information

Ukraine, the site of the worst environmental disaster in recent history, is still failing to protect the right of its citizens to access environmental information, reveals ARTICLE 19 in its new report: For Internal Use Only: Is Post-Chornobyl Ukraine Ready for Access to Environmental Information?, launched yesterday in Kyiv, Ukraine, and based on several months research in Ukraine.

Serious environmental problems remain in Ukraine, including unsafe storage of obsolete pesticides, military chemicals and radioactive waste. Inadequate treatment of industrial waste causes serious atmospheric and water pollution. According to research, 48% of Ukrainians find the condition of their environment unsatisfactory. Speaking about the dumping of toxic waste in the centre of a village a local resident told researchers: ‘It was the same information policy as during Chornobyl: actually, none’.

The detailed field research in Ukraine highlights the crucial importance of reliable and accurate

information on environmental matters to people’s lives, health, and well-being, and to environmental protection. The report demonstrates that only limited information is made available by the authorities, resulting in the Ukrainian population remaining largely unaware of the ongoing environmental hazards within their regions, and of the importance of adhering to environmental safety standards.

Key findings of the research include:

  • Despite the clear legal obligation of the State to disseminate environmental information, legislation does not specify in sufficient detail how the right to information can be exercised and what measures public bodies must take to ensure access to information.
  • Political and business elites perceive natural resources as means for personal enrichment.
  • Corruption remains widespread.
  • The authorities lack a commitment to effective dialogue with the public. Excessive bureaucracy in policy development and other factors contribute to a culture of secrecy.
  • Regulations on access to public interest information held by private businesses are still underdeveloped, although basic legal provisions do exist. The same is true for corporate social responsibility.
  • Poor educational policies and limited media coverage have resulted in low awareness of environmental issues among the general population, exacerbating problems.

ARTICLE 19 recommends:

    1. Ukrainian authorities should adopt a freedom of information law as a matter of urgency
    2. · Existing legislation on environmental information should be amended to create effective systems of access to information, ensure oversight of compliance with access to information requirements, and so as to encourage public participation in decisionmaking processes.
    3. Local and international civil society should continue to monitor the situation on access to environmental information, and work to improve citizens and the media’s knowledge and usage of access to information provisions.
    4. Ukrainian media should intensify reporting and investigation on issues of environmental concern with a view to informing and educating the public broadly on such matters, and avoid covering only emergencies.
    5. Companies based in Ukraine should proactively review the information they provide on their activity, and take a lead from the small number of Ukrainian companies who have pioneered policies of environmental protection and openness. A self-regulation approach could lead to a considerable improvement of the situation.

A copy of the report ‘For Internal Use Only: Is Post-Chornobyl Ukraine Ready for

Access to Environmental Information?’ is available at

 Share this