war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

The Supreme Court: Not all yet, I’ll begin from the end …Ukraine loses another case in Strasbourg over questionable “confessions”Contempt for the justice system from the Supreme Court?Supreme Court Judgment over the Yaremenko caseSupreme Court not bothered about European Court of Human Rights judgmentsWhat is the Supreme Court afraid of?Demons to bestow humanitarian aid on the Supreme CourtHow human rights activists and demons gave the Supreme Court humanitarian aidSupreme Court reboot on Shabelnik CaseRussia sentences human rights defender to 14 years for helping political prisoners seek justice from ECHR Volodymyr Panasenko, victim of Ukraine’s most egregious miscarriage of justice, freed after over 16 yearsCrimean Tatar activist sentenced to 18 years for discussing religion and Russian repression Russia upholds 14-year prison sentences for Crimean Tatar human rights activismControversial verdict over abduction, torture and killing of Euromaidan activist Yury VerbytskyyRussia flouts UN order and begins carrying out death sentence against Crimean Tatar civic journalist UN Committee orders Russia to refrain from killing second Crimean Tatar political prisoner in one month'Court' in Russian-occupied Crimea passes long sentences against three Ukrainian Jehovah’s Witnesses Ukraine’s new Media Law is ‘soaked in censorship,’ expert saysAbout the KHPG‘They just killed him’ — Vitaliy Matukhno, an inmate suffering from cancer, died in the prison hospital

Supreme Court once again ignores a European Court of Human Rights Judgment

It was learned on 7 December that the Supreme Court has refused to initiate a new court examination into the Stanislav Lutsenko case

Stanislav Lutsenko from Makiyivka was in 2003 convicted of murder, with the charges against him based on the initial testimony of his co-accused which the latter gave under duress and later retracted. Lutsenko and his lawyer lodged cassation appeals, however the Supreme Court upheld the October 2003 sentence. In 2004 Lutsenko lodged an application with the European Court of Human Rights which in December last year found that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and pointed out that Article 10 of Ukraine’s Law “On the enforcement of judgments and application of European Court of Human Rights case law” envisages that a court examination must be reinitiated if the European Court finds that there has been an infringement of the Convention.

It was learned on 7 December that the Supreme Court has refused to initiate a new court examination into the Lutsenko case, with the following words: “It has been established through study of the material of the criminal case that there are no grounds for making a submission to change or revoke the said court rulings as extraordinary proceedings.” Or more simply, Ukraine’s Supreme Court has again ignored a judgment of the European Court.

The conclusion is depressing: new disregard by the Supreme Court for judgments handed down by the European Court of Human Rights (the Supreme Court, as reported, in summer of this year flouted a European Court judgment and upheld the verdict in the Yaremenko case) will have highly adverse consequences for Ukraine, not to mention for the country’s image in the international arena which such acts can in no way improve.

 Share this