Documenting war crimes in Ukraine.
The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

She was about to turn 53. A citizen of Trostianets speaks about his wife’s detention and murder270 days of full-scale Russia-Ukraine war in the Kharkiv RegionUkraine accuses Russia of #Makiivka perfidy through simulated surrender She found out she was pregnant the day Russia invadedUkraine’s penitentiary institutions and the warAmnesty International’s 4 August statement. A response by the “Tribunal for Putin” initiative“Let’s Fight the Propaganda Together” Anti-war Activities in Russia, 9-16 July 2022Covert mobilization and Ukrainian conscripts from occupied Crimea sent to die in Russia’s war against Ukraine Russian legislative changes would mean school leavers can officially be sent to fight in Ukraine Desperate plea from the wives of Donbas men seized and sent to fight Russia’s war against UkraineRussia deports Ukrainians to occupied Donbas, forcing them to fight its war against Ukraine Russia is forcibly ‘mobilizing’ Ukrainians from occupied territory to fight its war against Ukraine After two acquittals, Russia finds more compliant judges to pass 15-year sentence against historian of the Terror Yury Dmitriev11-year sentence for ‘state treason’ against Ukrainian opposing Russia’s occupation of Crimea Russia is trying to destroy historian Yury Dmitriev and “what they’ve done to his daughter is even more horrifying”Russia launches attack on author of PACE report condemning human rights violations against Crimean TatarsRussia to answer to Strasbourg for imprisonment of historian of Stalin’s Terror, Yury Dmitriev Russia reverts to worst Soviet times in reprisal sentence against historian of the Terror Yury DmitrievNew Russian offensive to deprive imprisoned Russian Historian of the Terror Yury Dmitriev of his lawyer A brief description of the KHPG strategic litigations in July–December 2020

Changes to legislation on conscripts


Inna Sukhorukova, one of the KHPG group monitoring conscription twice a year, reports that in the last two years the Ministry of Defence has done quite a lot to improve the legislation pertaining to conscript service as well as military servicemen on contracts.

In 2008 the Ministry’s Order No. 207 was seriously reworked. Now, as Order No. 402, it contains Regulations on Military-Medical Assessments in the Armed Forces. There are now clear provisions on the need before the conscription process begins to gather all medical documentation about the young man about to be called up. The list is long and includes all relevant documents regarding psychiatric treatment, or treatment for allergies, and information regarding any infectious illnesses such as viral hepatitis or dysentery in the last six months. In comparison with Order No. 207 this article requires much more specific and comprehensive medical documentation.

This should avoid the situations which sometimes arose where information simply didn’t reach the military commissions, for example, where a young lad had finished a school for the mentally retarded.

The new requirements also specify which specimens must be provided. For the first time there is compulsory examination for HIV and hepatitis B and C.  Inna Sukhorukova points out that KHPG had been seeking these amendments for almost 10 years. In virtually every group of conscripts they found one who had been accepted for military service with hepatitis C.  According to specialists in this field within the military, the number of cases is much higher.

The requirements in Order No. 402 can be considered something of a revolution in enabling infectious diseases to be caught when people are being called up.

Unfortunately State funding has not been allocated for these tests.

No less needed is the Ministry of Defence’s Order from 20.10.2009 No. 525 on Instructions for organizing professional and psychological selection for the Armed Services.

The Instructions require all those who intend to enter military educational institutions or serve on contract to undergo professional and psychological tests. Variants of expert opinions are described in detail for various psychological indicators.

It is to be welcomed that the Instructions stipulate entire confidentiality of the assessment and clearly state who is liable for disclosure of confidential information.

It is not as yet clear whether the Instructions are to cover conscripts for whom such assessments are also needed.

 Share this