Similar articles

Prime Minister Azarov to answer charges of discrimination in courtComplaint to Human Rights Ombudsperson over Azarov’s discriminatory commentsAzarov: Carrying out reform is not a woman’s matterUkraine lagging behind in number of women in high officeSo what is positive in restricting women’s right to take part in government?PACE called on to consider the situation of women in UkraineLa Strada – Ukraine outraged by unconstitutional Cabinet of Ministers InstructionUkrainian female students protest against Tabachnyk’s “ugly” insultFormer HR Ombudsman Lyudmyla Denisova on her dismissal, 4 years of work, Ukrainians in occupied areas‘There were more than fifty bullets in the body of a friend’Mass arrests of Crimean Tatar men and women who came for the release of jailed lawyer Edem SemedlyaevPrisoners’ rights in Ukraine 2014-2021: KHPG reportA brief description of the KHPG strategic litigations in July–December 2020Russian-installed Crimean leader praises FSB for terrorizing Crimean TatarsContentious choice of Babyn Yar Holocaust Memorial Complex is a win-win situation for RussiaA brief description of the KHPG strategic litigations in January – June 2020Ukraine should release three thousand prisoners now and not wait for a major Covid-19 tragedyIs Ukraine’s penitentiary system ready to fight the coronavirus?How can a Russian oligarch control remembrance of the Victims of Babyn Yar in Ukraine?A brief description of KHPG strategic litigations in July–December 2019

Ukrainian women vs. Azarov

06.04.2010 |

Prominent Ukrainian activists are using the courts to fight sexist statements from those in power, however lawyers are not optimistic about the prospects for such civil suits.

The suit lodged with the Pechersky District Court in Kyiv claiming a violation by the Prime Minister of the constitutional right to gender equality requires clarification by 10 April. However one of the claimants, Head of La Strada – Ukraine, Kateryna Levchenko explains:

“A great deal of what clarification is sought on is already in the civil suit in which I ask for Mykola Azarov’s remarks in Dnipropetrovsk where he said that “carrying out reform in Ukraine is not a woman’s matter” to be declared discriminatory, and demand moral compensation of 1 UAH”.

Ms Levchenko is convinced that they will do anything to stall the suit, however she has no intention of backing down and hopes in this way to draw attention to the issue of gender discrimination in the country. She says that once all domestic avenues are exhausted, there are possibilities for defending ones rights at an international level. There is, for example, procedure for submitting individual complaints to the UN Committee on the Convention for Fighting all Forms of Discrimination against Women.

Lawyers are sceptical

Kyiv lawyer Viacheslav Yakubenko does not see much prospect for the civil suit. “In some cases public campaigns are much more effective than turning to the court”.

As reported, Ms Levchenko’s suit is one of two: Olena Suslova, Head of the Information and Consultative Women’s Centre has also filed a suit alleging violation of constitutional right to gender equality, however in her case the respondent is not the Prime Minister alone, but the Cabinet of Ministers as a whole.

The Cabinet of Ministers press service earlier claimed that the Prime Minister’s words had been distorted, and that he had simply been saying that women were not able to put in so many hours of work. However Ms Levchenko is adamant that there is a recording of his address and that there was no distortion.

She says that they have also lodged a complaint with the Human Rights Ombudsperson, however there has been no response.

From a report by Olha Vesnyanka at,,5433991,00.html

 Share this