war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

SBU demands operator installs “bugs”EU imposes sanctions over torture and persecution of Ukrainian journalist Vladislav Yesypenko, Nariman Dzhelyal and others in Russian-occupied CrimeaFinland detains Russian neo-Nazi ‘Rusich’ leader wanted for war crimes in Ukraine The case against Georgiy Logvynskyi must be closed. An open statementRussia sentences Ukrainians to over 20 years for partisan attack on Kherson collaborator Russia begins surreal ‘international terrorism trial’ after abducting and torturing five Ukrainians from occupied MelitopolAbducted Ukrainian first savagely tortured by Russian FSB, then by prison staff Ukrainian volunteer tortured by Russian FSB to fake evidence for ‘international terrorism’ show trial Russian invaders abduct Ukrainian volunteer caring for elderly grandmother in occupied MelitopolRussian FSB make mass arrests, claiming they 'thwarted Ukrainian terrorist plot' in occupied Crimea Kherson defender tortured for Russian propaganda, then hidden for over a year Ukrainian seized in Russian-occupied Mariupol, tortured and accused of ‘terrorism’ for sharing Navalny’s surname Constitution of Ukraine: social contract in the trials of warAbout the KHPGAbducted and tortured Ukrainian political prisoner faces additional prosecution for calling Russia's invasion of Ukraine a war ‘Cities speak’ — Digest of Russian ProtestsRussian FSB officer charged over unlawful detention and torture of Ukrainian journalist Vladyslav Yesypenko No end to Russia’s brutal reprisals against imprisoned 66-year-old historian of the Soviet Terror Ukraine’s penitentiary institutions and the warRussian FSB attaches electric currents to genitals to force abducted Ukrainian to sign multiple ‘confessions’

SBU listening devices on all mobile operators?

03.09.2010    source:
A Security Service officer, speaking on condition of anonymity, has said that Intertelecom indeed refused to install an automated system of communications interception, but said that it was probably the only company to have done so (and that a criminal case had been found against them over something else)

Following the statement from the mobile operator Intertelecom that the Security Service [SBU] had demanded that it install an automated system for intercepting information from communication channels, an SBU officer, on condition of anonymity, spoke with a reporter from the newspaper “Segodnya”.

The officer said that Intertelecom had indeed refused to install the system, but said that it was probably the only company to have done so, and that such a system has long been functioning in other mobile communications companies.

“However the refusal is a temporary matter. All communications companies in Ukraine work on expensive equipment of which a major part was brought into the country semi-legally. Therefore immediately after Intertelecom’s refusal to work with us, a criminal investigation was initiated against them for smuggling contraband.”, the SBU officer stated.

“Everybody knows that before getting onto the communications operators market, like any other businesses, they need permits. However few are aware that this package of documents includes a document signed by the SBU management”.

“Why is this done? It’s all very simply. The operator won’t receive the Head of the SBU’s signature if they don’t agree to install the listening device. Obviously they can make a stink in the press. However the point is that such practice exists in most countries. It’s one of the means of ensuring a country’s security.”

Officially the SBU assert that they act in accordance with Article 39-4 of the Law on Telecommunications which include the obligation for the operators to purchase and install equipment for a system of eavesdropping.

Operators confirmed this to the newspaper, but said that the monitoring is carried out legally, only if the person is a figure in an investigative operation and with a court warrant.

The newspaper notes that you can make just about anybody the object of such an investigative operation and the courts normally accept the arguments presented.

From the report  published at

 Share this