war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

SBU once again sniffing around a civic organizationThe Security Service has no interest in democracy ...SBU and democratic valuesSBU checks cooperation between International Renaissance Foundation and civic organizationRe-KGBization“Stop Censorship!” to hold protest against SBU activitiesRussia ‘retries’ Ukrainian doctor abducted, tortured and imprisoned for six years in occupied Donbas Defender of Crimean Tatar political prisoners faces 7-year sentence for posts against Russia’s war against UkraineRussia is brutally torturing and may kill dangerously ill Crimean Tatar political prisoner The Torture of Ukrainian soldiers and imprisoned civiliansAbout the KHPGSpontaneous Memorial on Ukrainsky Boulevard – Digest of Russian ProtestsRussia plans huge propaganda New Year tree in Mariupol while residents freeze in bombed city Russian FSB officer charged over unlawful detention and torture of Ukrainian journalist Vladyslav Yesypenko No end to Russia’s brutal reprisals against imprisoned 66-year-old historian of the Soviet Terror Ukraine’s penitentiary institutions and the warAbducted and tortured Ukrainian naval captain declares hunger strike in Russian captivity ‘Stand up for your convictions, even if you stand alone!’ Anti-war activities in Russia, 3-9 OctoberRussian atrocities at Bucha may be nothing to those that will be found when Kherson is liberated Silence abets Russia in torturing and risking the lives of Ukrainian hostages and POWs in occupied Donbas

Head of IMI asks Security Service to not intimidate her concierge

24.09.2010    source:
Victoria Syumar
Victoria Syumar, Director of the Institute for Mass Information, has publicly asked the SBU [Security Service] to stop scaring the concierge of the block of apartments where she lives (text in full).

Victoria Syumar, Director of the Institute for Mass Information, has publicly asked the SBU [Security Service] to stop scaring the concierge of the block of apartments where she lives.

Her text in full:

Request to the SBU: Don’t frighten the concierge

Even against the background of regular information about the “active” behaviour of Ukraine’s Security Service regarding “prophylactic conversations”, my terrified concierge was unexpected. She quietly recounted how SBU officers had come to her and asked her about the people living in my flat.  The main questions were: how they live, when they come in, who visits the flat, etc.

Quite honestly, at such behaviour from people who are supposed to ensure my country’s national security, you want to laugh. They could have asked me any of those questions. I’m ready to answer them. My telephone is entirely accessible. And Google in the modern world is also capable of providing more information than my concierge.

I am sorry that our domestic “JamesBonds” are wasting time on such “information gathering” about civic activists, journalists, historians, wasting time on specific “talks” with university rectors, recipients of grants from the International Renaissance Foundation, and so forth.

I am sorry that “the grandiose tasks” of restoring the authority of the Ukrainian Security Service, turning it into the “new KGB”, or at least the FSB, look so feeble. And those setting such a course in just that matter are in no way similar to Vladimir Putin, although clearly they’d like to repeat his career success.

It’s now time to put the question: who in reality is harming national security: activists, journalists and historians who are simply doing their jobs, or people who issue the order to detain the Director of a German Foundation on the eve of the President’s trip to Germany, to have “talks” with Renaissance Foundation grant receivers before the visit of the US Deputy Secretary of State, or to interrogate a blogger, provoking millions of unpleasant notes on the Internet?

I am sorry for those who have to carry out such orders, sorry for the Press Secretary who has to constantly report that the “incident is closed”, and look for some more or less comprehensible explanation for these overt blunders.

Is it not perhaps time to place in question the professional worth of people who should be dealing with serious matters and not playing banal children’s games based on personal psychological complexes? This is a rhetorical question for those who are still publicly explaining that the main offices on Volodymyrska St (SBU headquarters) are occupied by “top professionals in their business”.

 Share this