MENU
Documenting
war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

80-year-old wheelchair-bound Ukrainian rescued after being left within a pension in occupied Donbas for refusing to take Russian citizenship‘Ukraine is not Russia’: Judge expresses opposing view over pensioner’s prison sentence for a ‘like’ ‘I stole a fuel truck from the Russians’ — a pensioner from Dymer provided fuel for a local hospitalRussian FSB get ‘good terrorism statistics’ by imprisoning Crimean Tatar pensioners‘We just love Ukraine. Why do they harm us?’ — a pensioner from Mariupol couldn’t hold back tearsCrimean Tatar pensioner detained for calling Russia a fascist state on Facebook Large protest in Russian-devastated Mariupol after pensioners die trying to find drinking water 66-year-old Ukrainian pensioner hurled about and abused by Russian captors Heartbreaking letter from Ukrainian pensioner sentenced by Russian occupiers to 12 years for ‘treason’Russian-controlled militants sentence 70-year-old pensioner to 17 years for ‘spying’ after torturing him and his familyBelarus threatens to use lethal force against protesters as pensioners march for freedomUkraine’s MPs leave Donbas pensioners to keep dying for their pensionsRussian-controlled Donbas militants finally free severely disabled pensioner but not her invalid sonRussian-controlled Donbas militants seize pensioner and his familyPensioner jailed for 12 years in Russia on charges of telling Ukraine about military activities near the borderUkraine will only help Russia by stripping Donbas residents who take Russian citizenship of their pensionsExtraordinary Ukrainian collaboration with Russia against Crimeans forced to flee their homesWhy are Ukrainian pensioners from Donbas forced to fight or die for their pensions?Vital healthcare reforms at risk after court’s suspension of Acting Health Minister SuprunRussian lawyer abducted, beaten & jailed for trying to defend arrested protesters

Restricting maximum pension size: reform or more PR?

08.12.2010    source: i-law.kiev.ua
Maxim Shcherbatyuk
The government has long come up against the lack of divide in legislation between guarantees which by their very essence are socio-economic rights with provisions which are effectively privileges

Following the meeting between Prime Minister Azarov and the Head of the Pension Fund, B. Zaichuk, the media reported that the maximum size of pensions was to be restricted.

It is clear that the government wishes to reduce expenditure on payment of pensions since the Pension Fund has major difficulty in forming its budget. Nor does it seem fair to have a huge divide in pensions between ordinary people and “selected” pensioners. The divide is massive with reports in the media suggesting that pensions can be 800 UAH a month (less than 100 Euro) or 50 thousand.

However in resolving this issue the government has over many years already encountered the problem of a lack of divide in legislation between guarantees which by their very essence are socio-economic rights with provisions which are effectively privileges. If with regard to the first, no reduction in their content and scope is permitted, privileges can be restricted.

The existence of this problem effectively renders it impossible for the government to carry out State regulation in this sphere. This has been highlighted on a number of occasions in Constitutional Court Judgments where the Court has examined issues linked with exercise of the right to protection against restrictions of the constitutional right to a decent standard of living.

The Constitutional Court has several times found unconstitutional amendments to laws which envisage restriction of the maximum amount of pensions for certain categories of the public.

For example, the Constitutional Court found unconstitutional the restriction to the maximum size of pensions in the Law on the State Budget for 2008 and on amendments to some legislative acts of Ukraine, as well as the relevant provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers Resolution on Some Issues of Social Protection of Certain Categories of Citizens from 28 May 2008, No. 530.

In the Constitutional Court Judgments it was stated that benefits, compensation, guarantees are a form of social assistance and necessary component of the constitutional right to a sufficient standard of living. Therefore, reduction in the content and scope of this right by adopting new laws or making amendments to current laws are not permitted by Article 22 of the Constitution.

It therefore seems rather doubtful that these government plans can be implemented without radical reform of the system of benefits and the entire system of pensions. Without such measures words about achieving social justice in the size of pensions will remain words, a certain PR move for the government in office.

 Share this