war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Constitution of Ukraine: social contract in the trials of warA brief description of the KHPG strategic litigations in the first half of 2021Legal Opinion on the political motives of the criminal prosecution and violations of human rights in criminal proceedings of Konstantin ZhevagoJudge who persecuted Maidan activists could get millions in ‘compensation’ following Supreme Court rulingOpinion on the political motives of criminal persecution and violation of human rights in the case of Sergiy Pashinsky20 years after Gongadze murder, the killers of another Ukrainian journalist are being protectedReturn to Yanukovych’s selective justice condemned as thousands protest plan to arrest PoroshenkoCriminal probe against Poroshenko regarding Biden tape discredits Zelensky and UkraineUkrainian whistle-blower MP faces criminal probe after reporting high-level corruptionNotorious judge awards ex-Yanukovych aide millions in damages from UkrainePolice killer of journalist Georgy Gongadze could be freed amid silence about those who ordered the crimeIn Memory of Georgy Gongadze, Pavel Sheremet and All Slain JournalistsBody Of Ukrainian Reporter Gongadze Finally BuriedGongadze Murder Sentence Upheld – Silence on Who Ordered the KillingGeorgy Gongadze remembered; questions still unansweredLustration law to face Constitutional Court scrutinyRemembering Georgy Gongadze and other slain journalistsWhat should they talk about, Mr Putin?Security Service of Ukraine and Human RightsIvashchenko “cleared” by the same judges who convicted him

Constitutional Court judgement could destroy case against Kuchma

22.10.2011    source:


The Constitutional Court has issued a judgement which effectively eliminates the Melnychenko tapes as evidence in any attempt to prosecute former President Kuchma over the killing of journalist Georgy Gongadze.

The Court was responding to a request from the Security Service to interpret Article 82.3 of the Constitution (“An accusation shall not be based on illegally obtained evidence as well as on assumptions”).

The Constitutional Court decided that this should be understood as meaning that an accusation of having committed a crime cannot be based on factual data obtained as the result of investigative operation activity of a person with such authority without adherence to constitutional norms or with infringement of the rules of procedure established by law.

An accusation is also impossible if the facts were received by carrying out activities to gather or record them using means envisaged by the law on investigative operations by a person not authorized to carry out such activities.

The CCU judgement is final, mandatory and not subject to appeal.

Earlier, the lawyer representing former Presidential guard, Mykola Melnychenko commented on the SBU submission as follows: “It took place just when the criminal investigation against former President Kuchma was coming to an end, and Mr Melnychenko’s tapes (illicitly taken of conversations between Kuchma and others – translator) were accepted as evidence in the given case). 

 Share this