war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Court upholds criminal investigation against Mykola Melnychenko

The ruling comes nearly two weeks after the same Pechersky District Court r quashed the criminal proceedings against Leonid Kuchma over the murder of Georgy Gongadze, because the tapes made by Melnychenko are no longer deemed admissible evidence

Georgy Gongadze was murdered in September 2000

The Pechersky District Court in Kyiv on Monday 26 December decided that the decision by the Prosecutor General’s Office back in 2001 to initiate criminal proceedings against former Presidential guard Mykola Melnychenko had been lawful. In so doing it rejected an appeal from Mr Melnychenko’s lawyer, Mykola Nedilko.

The ruling comes nearly two weeks after the same court on 14 December quashed the criminal proceedings against Leonid Kuchma over the murder of journalist Georgy Gongadze.  The court stated that there were no grounds for initiating such an investigation since a Constitutional Court judgement from October 2011 prevented the tapes made by Melnychenko as being used as evidence (as having been made by a person not authorized to do so).

The decision to drop the charges against Kuchma elicited outrage among Ukrainian and international media organizations and has been appealed by the lawyer representing Myroslava Gongadze (as well, perhaps less convincingly, by the Prosecutor General).

The tapes made by Melnychenko in the office of President Kuchma had been declared material evidence in the criminal prosecution,

From 2001 to 2004 criminal investigations were initiated against Melnychenko on charges of exceeding his authority, divulging state secrets, as well as of creating artificial evidence for the prosecution. In March 2005 the investigations were terminated by Prosecutor General Piskun. In June this year Kuchma’s lawyers appealed to the Pechersky District Court against the termination of the criminal investigation. That appeal was allowed, and the criminal investigation against Melnychenko reinstated.  His lawyer had presumably for that reason tried to get the original decision overturned – unsuccessfully.

This now means that unless the appeal is successful, any trial against Kuchma has been declared without grounds since the main evidence was not obtained by those with the authority to carry out surveillance.

Those with such authority were totally under the control of the President.

Major Melnychenko is indeed facing charges for making the recordings. 


 Share this