MENU
Documenting war crimes in Ukraine.
The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Human rights NGOs: UN should exert gentle pressure on Ukrainian governmentHuman Rights in Ukraine – 2011 Report issuedUkrainians “complain to the UN” over corruption, discrimination and tortureHuman rights in Ukraine: Government & NGO reports differ radicallyUkraine rejects UN Periodic Review recommendations on selective justiceRussia, Uzbekistan Among Rights Abusers Elected To UN Human Rights Council October 14, 2020 00:07 GMTIs Ukraine’s penitentiary system ready to fight the coronavirus?KHARKIV HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION GROUP. ANNUAL REPORT. 2017Russian FSB “make their careers” by jailing Crimean Muslims on fake ’terrorism’ & ’extremism’ chargesHuman rights in the territory controlled by the Government of Ukraine along the delimitation line and in so-called Luhansk People’s Republic and Donetsk People’s Republic (2017)KHARKIV HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2016VIII. Protection against discriminationII. Legal grounds for and the practice of detaining a person23. Human trafficking and violation of human rights11. Protection from discriminationProtest over harassment of Reporters without Borders Ukrainian representativeUN watchdog expresses concern over dependent judiciary and police impunityShadow Report to the List of Issues for the Seventh periodic report of Ukraine on the implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR/C/UKR/Q/7)Human rights activists urge MPs to defend freedom of peaceful assembly25. TRAFFICKING IN HUMAN BEINGS AS A VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Alternative views on Ukraine’s human rights record

17.10.2012   

On 24 October Ukraine is due to present the government’s report for the four-yearly Universal Periodic Review. This will be the second time that Ukraine is reporting with the UN wanting to know about Ukraine’s fulfilment (or otherwise) of the recommendations which it agreed to in 2008.  These included passing comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation; strengthening judicial independence; prevention of torture promotion of children’s rights.  There were more than 30 recommendations in total with these of a strategic nature regarding fulfilment of obligations under international agreements.  The Universal Periodic Review is the largest-scale mechanism for monitoring human rights within the UN system.

It is other members of the UN Human Rights Council who give recommendations. Because of this the UPR as a mechanism is often accused of being politicized, with countries with extremely different political systems handing out recommendations. In 2012 the UK had its prison conditions equated with torture by Russia and Belarus.

The Committee will have the opportunity to consider the rather upbeat report presented by Ukraine’s government with the rather more critical assessments presented by various Ukrainian NGOs.

In May this year there was a breakfast for diplomats where representatives of those NGOs presented their alternative reports and recommendations.  A coalition of 40 Ukrainian NGOs provided the UN with 12 shadow reports on different aspects of human rights.  The reports highlight, for example, failings in judicial reform which the NGOs are convinced make judges even less independent; selective prosecution of political opponents and other human rights violations.

The reports are all available here: http://helsinki.org.ua/en/index.php?id=1337408317

 Share this