war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Acquittal rate perilously close to zeroCourt finally listens over death of remand prisonerWhen no sentence can be a death sentenceWhy gravely ill prisoners are not releasedScepticism over new rules for prisoners’ healthcareIn the Prosecutor’s Line of FireRussia revokes sole acquittal of Crimean Tatar civic journalist and political prisonerVermin, filth and cold in Russia’s torture of imprisoned Crimean Tatar journalists and activists Crimean Tatar veteran’s civic journalist son sentenced to 16 years by Russia on same charges as Stalin used against her grandfather After two acquittals, Russia finds more compliant judges to pass 15-year sentence against historian of the Terror Yury DmitrievAcquittal and monstrous sentences in Russia’s offensive against Crimean Tatar civic journalists & activistsShock acquittal of Ukrainian judge involved in persecuting Maidan activistsAnger over acquittal of ex-Berkut officer charged with torturing Maidan activistsSecond eyebrow-raising acquittal on corruption charges for former Ukrainian Tax Academy HeadDramatic Acquittals in Trial over Odesa 2 May 2014 RiotsCourt revokes acquittal of controversial Ukrainian journalist & first post-Maidan prisoner of conscienceWhy Ukraine acquits 10 times less often than in Stalin’s Soviet UnionControversial acquittal of mayor accused of organizing Kremlin-backed separatist ‘referendum’Ex-Tax Academy head’s controversial acquittal on corruption charges revokedRussia’s Crimean Show Trial: “No illusions” about Sentsov & Kolchenko acquittal

10 times less acquittals now than in Stalin’s Soviet Union

In Ukraine’s judicial system an acquittal is seen as an extraordinary event which could cause the judge problems, while handing doen convictions is seen as carrying out their duties

As reported, the chances of being acquitted by a Ukrainian court are close to nil. Deutsche Welle reports the State Judicial Administration as saying that in 2012 there were 707 acquittals against 185 thousand convictions. That figure is higher than reported earlier, but is horrifyingly low nonetheless.

Deutsche Welle spoke with Arkady Bushchenko, Executive Director of the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union who says that despite the new Criminal Procedure Code, the judiciary in Ukraine is so entrenched in its ways that it would be unwise to expect any radical shift.  He notes that in the judicial system an acquittal is seen as an extraordinary event which could cause the judge problems. Judges themselves acknowledge that it’s easier for them to hand down convictions since they will be considered to be carrying out their duty.

Bushchenko says that almost all former Soviet republics have such a harsh judicial system, but notes that in the worst year of the Terror, 1937, 10% of court rulings were acquittals, whereas the rate now is less than one percent.  In EU countries, the rate is between 5 and 10% and in the USA, for example, in Texas, it gets up to 50%.

Why have such an expensive system, he asks, if judges almost never acquit defendants? 

Other factors are corruption and corporate loyalty. According to Andriy Didenko from the Kharkiv Human Rights Group, while you can’t even pay for an acquittal in Ukraine, you can end up behind bars because judges have been bribed. He says that the position of the investigators, the Prosecutor and the judges is almost always the same.

He sees a major cause of this being the fact that while the police need to produce statistics of number of crimes “solved”, the courts also need to present statistics of effective work.  They thus prop each other up.

The human rights workers agree that the new Criminal Procedure Code can improve the situation. The new CPC provides more guarantees for people accused of crimes and there are more demands for a conviction.  Yet a lot of convictions are still handed down on the basis of unacceptable evidence.  Arkady Bushchenko stresses that it would be foolish to pin ones hopes on the CPC alone and says that advocates and the public need to apply pressure to teach judges to acquit where appropriate.  He does not expect changes to be noticed soon. 

 Share this