war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

New leaders, same questionable practicesCome to your senses!Parliament frees some judicial victims, ignores others6 year sentences in surreal Vasylkiv “terrorist trial”Dismantled Lenin Monument makes Vasylkiv terrorist trial a farceDubious terrorist charge could carry long terms of imprisonmentMembers of “Patriot of Ukraine” charged with terrorism demand new judgeAlleged “Vasilkiv terrorist” trial adjourned till 6 FebruaryTrial begins of alleged Vasilkiv terroristsRussian court helps prosecution fake evidence in ‘trial’ of Crimean Tatar civic activist Russia to deport Ukrainians who reject Russian citizenship from occupied Ukraine as ‘foreigners’ Constitution of Ukraine: social contract in the trials of warFormer HR Ombudsman Lyudmyla Denisova on her dismissal, 4 years of work, Ukrainians in occupied areasReform strategy of medical care for prisoners (updated)US imposes sanctions on former Yanukovych aide Andriy Portnov for corrupting Ukraine’s courts Russian court ignores falsified evidence and dodgy 'witnesses' in trial of Crimean Tatar political prisoners Russia calls Crimean Tatar physicist & civic journalist a ‘terrorist’ for reporting its lawlessness Judge who persecuted Maidan activists could get millions in ‘compensation’ following Supreme Court rulingRussian court removes Crimean Tatar political prisoners for speaking their native language Russia exploits war veterans for offensive against opposition activists and historical truth

High Court finds dismissal of Yanukovych’s Constitutional Court head unlawful

On Wednesday the High Administrative Court allowed the suit brought by Viacheslav Ovcharenko against his dismissal in February by a parliamentary resolution

On Wednesday the High Administrative Court allowed the suit brought by Viacheslav Ovcharenko against the Verkhovna Rada.  Ovcharenko had asked for the decision to dismiss him from his post as head of the Constitutional Court to be declared unlawful and for certain actions to be ordered.

Ovcharenko’s lawyer, Oleg Alexandrovych explains that the grounds cited were that the procedure for dismissing CCU judges for breach of oath had not been observed. According to this procedure, the CCU should have met and organized a check. After that check had been carried out, the CCU’s ethics committee should have given its accessment which would have been approved by the CCU and sent to the Verkhovna Rada. Instead, Alexandrovych asserts, parliament took on the powers of the CCU.

The Verkhovna Rada passed a resolution on Feb 24 2014 which dismissed Ovcharenko together with four other CCU judges.  The dismissals were mainly in connection with the judges’ part in the CCU judgement of September 30, 2010, which reinstated a presidential system, giving Viktor Yanukovych considerably more power.

The view was widespread that under Yanukovych all courts, including the CCU, were ‘brought to heel’, with judges providing the judgements expected of them.  There was nonetheless concern both in Ukraine and abroad at the dismissal of the judges, especially through a parliamentary resolution.

Ovcharenko’s appointment as head of the CCU in July 2013 was generally viewed as being because of his close links with Yanukovych.  Very many of the reports in the media demonstrated his watch, valued at around $27, 000.  Most also noted the he fact that he had once been the head of the court that “lost” all record of Yanukovych’s two criminal convictions.

New information from Yuridecheskaya praktyka

 Share this