Russia’s RT issued with final warning over biased reports
An UPDATE can be found here: RT Editor complains of “biased accusations” by UK regulator
Ofcom, the United Kingdom’s broadcasting regulatorthe Russian state-funded TV channel RT ‘on notice’ over repeated breaches of broadcasting standards. The channel’s licence-holder TV Novosti has been warned that it will face sanctions or other regulatory measures if it continues to provide biased, unbalanced and inaccurate material.
Three people are reported to have complained about news bulletins on March 1 and 3 this year. They pointed out critical remarks about the interim Ukrainian government “including allegations of far right-wing influence on the new administration in Ukraine.”
Ofcom then also identified two further bulletins from March 5 and 6, 2014, “which raised issues warranting investigation”.
In its report, Ofcom provides a transcript of material which in tone and content differs little from most other material seen by observers following RT and other Russian media since early this year.
It finds the news bulletins to have “raised issues warranting investigation” under the rules of the Code on due accuracy; due impartiality; and range of views (or, in RT’s case, lack of such).
TV Novosti, asked for its response, made assurances about treating “the issue of due impartiality with the utmost seriousness” and stated that RT aimed to provide: “an alternative perspective on major global events and to acquaint
international audiences with the Russian viewpoint”. and that is what [RT’s] audiences expect”. It added that RT: "delivers stories often missed by the mainstream media to create news with an edge”. It claimed that the alternative viewpoints provided by RT are: "not limited to the Russian viewpoint”.
One especially interesting argument put forward by TV Novosti’s lawyers was that
“It would not further the interests of citizens to inhibit broadcasters from seeking to challenge established Western views, particularly in the current climate, by excluding the Russian viewpoint...[and] audiences would lose out if the Western viewpoint were a fugitive and cloistered position that never ventured out to be tested adversarially in public debate against an opposing view”. In the Licensee’s view, therefore: “Democratic debate would be diminished if audiences were to be deprived of insights into the Russian viewpoint”.
Ofcom is obliged only to consider RT’s compliance with its licence in the UK, and could not be expected to comment on other matters. RT’s lessons about ‘democratic debate’, for one, should be considered against the background of all Russian state-run television which gives anything but unbiased ‘insight’ into viewpoints other than that espoused by the Kremlin.
Ofcom’s analysis of the claims and the actual material in the context of the European Convention on Human Rights and its own code of standards is thorough. The Committee concludes that the reports did not show due impartiality and that in all the bulletins it reviewed, there was only one case where the views of the interim government could be said to have been presented.
"Therefore, as a result of the current case, we are putting TV Novosti on notice that any future breaches of the due impartiality rules may result in further regulatory action, including consideration of a statutory sanction."
The breaches in question were from early March, so the scope for complaint is great. So too is the need. Mashable reports that the percentage of people in the UK who use RT for news fell from 2% in 2013 to 1% in 2014.
That is still quite some number if you consider that the material is often inaccurate, manipulative and aimed at inculcating destructive stereotypes.
Some of its most flagrant breaches of all broadcasting standards are first produced and shown, and then removed, after enough people have viewed them and enough copies have been made.
This was the case on July 13 with a supposed documentary which claimed that ’the junta’ in Kyiv and its ’Nazi mercenaries’ are carrying out genocide, ethnic cleansing and starving its population, while children are being taught Nazi slogans and salutes.
This went on to assert that eyewitnesses had spoken of “unarmed civilians being systematically massacred – village after village, town after town - all under complete mainstream media silence”
RT claimed that Kyiv was carrying out daily mass bombings of unarmed civilians. They were ‘reportedly using “cluster bombs designed to kill or maim everyone in the surrounding area”.
Some viewers have said that they enjoy seeing something so obviously a counter to western media outlets. They do, however, watch both and presumably can recognize the lies. RT is standardly provided in hotels as one of the available English-language channels. The chances that viewers are aware that they are receiving inaccurate information and manipulative propaganda are not high.
It is likely that new infringements can only be reported after Ofcom’s warning was issued. The channel’s staff are not paid fat salaries to tell the truth and finding new examples of bias should be no problem.
The danger of RT should not be underestimated. It certainly is not by the Kremlin which has recentlythe funding for RT and its international propaganda machine.