war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Russia sentences human rights defender to 14 years for helping political prisoners seek justice from ECHR Volodymyr Panasenko, victim of Ukraine’s most egregious miscarriage of justice, freed after over 16 yearsCrimean Tatar activist sentenced to 18 years for discussing religion and Russian repression Russia upholds 14-year prison sentences for Crimean Tatar human rights activism‘Defeating Russia in this war increases the chances of making it face justice’ Yevgeniy Zakharov’s interview with the Media Detector NGO (Ukraine) Russia escalates torture conditions against imprisoned Crimean Tatar leader Nariman Dzhelyal Liquidating the SOVA Center: The Official End of Religious Freedom in RussiaRussian invaders abduct Ukrainian volunteer caring for elderly grandmother in occupied MelitopolEnsuring that Russia answers for its killing of children in Uman and countless other war crimes Thousands of Ukrainians called ‘foreigners’ and stripped of their property rights in Russian-occupied Crimea Controversial verdict over abduction, torture and killing of Euromaidan activist Yury VerbytskyyRussia flouts UN order and begins carrying out death sentence against Crimean Tatar civic journalist Ukrainian officials prevent former political prisoner held in Russia from returning to UkraineArrest warrant against Putin sends a vital signal, however Russia began committing that war crime in 2014 Constitution of Ukraine: social contract in the trials of warUN Committee orders Russia to refrain from killing second Crimean Tatar political prisoner in one monthNobel Peace Prize laureate Ales Bialiatski and his Viasna colleagues sentenced to heavy prison terms in Belarus'Court' in Russian-occupied Crimea passes long sentences against three Ukrainian Jehovah’s Witnesses Ukraine’s new Media Law is ‘soaked in censorship,’ expert saysIn an atmosphere of evil. Arkady Davarov — switching fields of energy

Russian High Court Says European Court’s Rulings Can Be Ignored

Tom Baimforth
Russia’s Constitutional Court has ruled that officials can ignore judgments by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) if they are found to contravene the Russian Constitution.

Russia’s Constitutional Court has ruled that officials can ignore judgments by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) if they are found to contravene the Russian Constitution.

Handed down amid growing isolation from the West, the ruling essentially allows Russia to formally reject judgments from the European court in Strasbourg, a key international institution for rights advocates that receives thousands of cases from Russia every year.

Russia has lost a number of high-profile cases in Strasbourg and been ordered to pay out hefty compensation in scores of politically embarrassing cases surrounding the former Yukos oil and gas empire, for instance, as well as rights violations in the restive southern republic of Chechnya.

The Constitutional Court on July 14 said it would be "justified" for Russian lawmakers to set up a special judicial mechanism to guarantee the "supremacy" of the Russian Constitution when Russia executes rulings issued by the European court. 

Human rights activists criticized the ruling as evidence of the "dangerous" sway of the executive over the judiciary, while the judges said their decision is in line with the Vienna Convention governing international treaties.

The court emphasized that Russia remains under the jurisdiction of the European human rights court that was established by the European Convention on Human Rights, ratified by Russia in 1998.

"A conflict is possible if the [ECHR] interprets the Convention in a way that contradicts Russia’s Constitution, ” a court statement posted online said. "In such a situation, because of the supremacy of the Founding Law, Russia will be obliged not to literally follow the resolution of the Strasbourg court."

Russia is expected to use the ruling to challenge a European court judgment in July 2014 that ordered Russia to pay Yukos shareholders 1.9 billion euros ($2.1 billion) in compensation for the dismantling and nationalization of the oil empire once run by tycoon-turned-dissident Mikhail Khodorkovksy.

On July 1, 93 State Duma deputies appealed to the Russian Constitutional Court to examine and reconsider several articles of Russia’s constitution. The deputies said the articles acknowledge the supremacy of international law above domestic legislation and therefore undermine Russian sovereignty. 

The Constitutional Court declined to question those articles, ruling that "Russia’s participation in international treaties does not mean rejecting state sovereignty."

The Russian human rights community chided the court for the ruling.

"This ruling by the Constitutional Court appears to be a bit of an oxymoron, " said Tanya Lokshina, the Russia program director for Human Rights Watch (HRW). "The Russian Constitution says very clearly that international law is supreme."

"I believe it really is quite dangerous, " Lokshina says, "because it demonstrates that the Constitutional Court appears to be a willing tool in the hands of the executive branch at this point."

 Share this