Documenting war crimes in Ukraine.
The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Russia sentences Crimean Tatar Mejlis leader Nariman Dzhelyal to 17 years in revenge for Crimea Platform Russia’s Luhansk proxies ‘sentence’ two OSCE employees to 13 years on grotesque treason charges Izium Mass Graves: Tortured victims with bound hands and entire families killed by the Russian invaders 13-year sentence against Belarusian investigative journalist who helped expose crimes against Ukraine New armed searches and arrests in Russian-occupied Crimea for reading the Bible Russian prosecutor demands 15-year sentences against Crimean Tatar leader Nariman Dzhelyal and two tortured cousins Savage sentences in Russia’s religious persecution and plunder in occupied Crimea Russia killed Inna’s husband, destroyed her home and give awards to the killers for ‘liberating’ MariupolMock executions used to fabricate Russia"s revenge ‘trial’ of Crimean Tatar leader Nariman Dzhelyal Tortured Crimean Tatar political prisoner forced to memorize and rehearse fake sabotage ‘confession’ Russian proxy ‘Donetsk republic’ threatens foreign defenders of Ukraine will be executed, with families not told whenFeminists, “Railroad Partisans” and School-Leavers Protest. A Digest of Protests in Russia, 25 June-2 July 2022 Former HR Ombudsman Lyudmyla Denisova on her dismissal, 4 years of work, Ukrainians in occupied areasAfter violently seizing Crimea, Russia accuses peaceful Crimean Tatars of ‘terrorism’ for defending political prisoners European Court orders Russia not to carry out ‘death sentence’ against POW defending Ukraine Russian medics acknowledge that 60-year-old Crimean Tatar political prisoner’s life is in danger ECHR rules too late against Russia’s notorious ‘foreign agent’ law and hardly moves over violations in occupied Crimea Russia kills refugee in occupied Crimea, then ‘puts him on trial’Crucial judgement for Jehovah’s Witnesses as Russia tries to deny ECHR jurisdiction for its war crimes in Ukraine Prosecution witnesses confirm testimony’ against Crimean Tatar leader Nariman Dzhelyal was obtained through torture

Russian High Court Says European Court’s Rulings Can Be Ignored

Tom Baimforth

Russia’s Constitutional Court has ruled that officials can ignore judgments by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) if they are found to contravene the Russian Constitution.

Handed down amid growing isolation from the West, the ruling essentially allows Russia to formally reject judgments from the European court in Strasbourg, a key international institution for rights advocates that receives thousands of cases from Russia every year.

Russia has lost a number of high-profile cases in Strasbourg and been ordered to pay out hefty compensation in scores of politically embarrassing cases surrounding the former Yukos oil and gas empire, for instance, as well as rights violations in the restive southern republic of Chechnya.

The Constitutional Court on July 14 said it would be "justified" for Russian lawmakers to set up a special judicial mechanism to guarantee the "supremacy" of the Russian Constitution when Russia executes rulings issued by the European court. 

Human rights activists criticized the ruling as evidence of the "dangerous" sway of the executive over the judiciary, while the judges said their decision is in line with the Vienna Convention governing international treaties.

The court emphasized that Russia remains under the jurisdiction of the European human rights court that was established by the European Convention on Human Rights, ratified by Russia in 1998.

"A conflict is possible if the [ECHR] interprets the Convention in a way that contradicts Russia’s Constitution, ” a court statement posted online said. "In such a situation, because of the supremacy of the Founding Law, Russia will be obliged not to literally follow the resolution of the Strasbourg court."

Russia is expected to use the ruling to challenge a European court judgment in July 2014 that ordered Russia to pay Yukos shareholders 1.9 billion euros ($2.1 billion) in compensation for the dismantling and nationalization of the oil empire once run by tycoon-turned-dissident Mikhail Khodorkovksy.

On July 1, 93 State Duma deputies appealed to the Russian Constitutional Court to examine and reconsider several articles of Russia’s constitution. The deputies said the articles acknowledge the supremacy of international law above domestic legislation and therefore undermine Russian sovereignty. 

The Constitutional Court declined to question those articles, ruling that "Russia’s participation in international treaties does not mean rejecting state sovereignty."

The Russian human rights community chided the court for the ruling.

"This ruling by the Constitutional Court appears to be a bit of an oxymoron, " said Tanya Lokshina, the Russia program director for Human Rights Watch (HRW). "The Russian Constitution says very clearly that international law is supreme."

"I believe it really is quite dangerous, " Lokshina says, "because it demonstrates that the Constitutional Court appears to be a willing tool in the hands of the executive branch at this point."

 Share this