MENU
Documenting
war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Soviet-era norm allows revenge prosecution of prisoners who assert their rightsUkrainian prisoners can get years added to their sentence for demanding their rightsUkraine’s Parliament slips in dangerous carte blanche for blocking torture investigationsYour families will suffer too: No limits to Russia’s persecution of Crimean Tatars and other Ukrainians Russia tortures nine Ukrainians from Kherson for grotesque ‘international terrorism trial’ Kherson IT specialist abducted, tortured and sentenced in Russian-occupied Ukraine to 11 years for trying to get his family to safety Putin grants Russian citizenship to suspected Bosnian Serb war criminal, pardons serial killer to fight against UkraineUkraine sentences ‘chief butcher’ of Russian-controlled Izolyatsia secret torture prison to 15 yearsRussia ‘retries’ Ukrainian doctor abducted, tortured and imprisoned for six years in occupied Donbas New evidence of Russia killing Ukrainian prisoners of war in cold blood Crimean Tatar journalist and activists face huge sentences in Russia’s retaliation for humiliating attack by Ukraine 15-year sentence demanded for ‘butcher’ of Izolyatsia secret prison in Russian-occupied Donetsk Ukraine launches war crimes probe after Russians use Ukrainian POWs as human shields Russia frees criminals, sentences Crimean Tatar civic journalist to 11 years for moral integrity22-year-old Ukrainian jailed for 3 years for writing that Russia is destroying Ukraine Ukrainian prisoner dies after savage beating by prison staff and refusal to provide medical care Russia fakes trials and life sentences against Ukrainian POWs to rewrite the facts about its war crimes and destruction of Mariupol ‘War is Death’: a Digest of Russian ProtestsRussia is holding around four thousand Ukrainian civilians prisoner, torturing most of themFirst huge sentence in Russia’s cynical ‘international terrorism trials’ of Ukrainians abducted from illegally occupied Ukraine

Ukraine’s legislators refuse to part with repressive Soviet-era norm

18.07.2016   
Halya Coynash
Ukraine’s MPs have failed worse tests, nonetheless the refusal to remove a norm hearkening back to Soviet times is frustrating. It is likely that many MPs could simply not be bothered to read the bill, with this potentially costing prisoners up to three years’ extra imprisonment.

Ukraine’s MPs have failed worse tests, nonetheless the refusal to remove a norm hearkening back to Soviet times is frustrating.  It is likely that many MPs could simply not be bothered to read the bill, with this potentially costing prisoners up to three years’ extra imprisonment. 

The bill in question No 2708 would remove Article 391 of the Ukraine’s Criminal Code which makes it possible to foist another term of imprisonment on a prisoner already serving a sentence.  The norm, first created back in 1983, is supposedly applied if a prisoner has “persistently disobeyed the legitimate demands of prison authorities, or shown any other form of resistance”.  The ‘persistence’ is measured by whether a prisoner has, for example, been placed in a punishment cell, or faced similar penalties more than once within the space of a year.

The scope for abuse is enormous.  According to rights activist Andriy Didenko, in Soviet times you could easily end up reaching the end of your sentence only to have another one added.  Under the Soviets, that might be because you hadn’t changed your views.  Now it could be simply because the prison administration has it in for you. 

A new Criminal Code was introduced in 2001 and only modified one part of the norm, leaving the basic possibility of adding sentences intact.

Kharkiv Human Rights Group lawyers are aware of dozens of cases where prisoners have tried to appeal against such additional sentences, with few succeeding.  The court will look at the fact that a person was put in a punishment cell more than once and reject his appeal.  Why they were put there is not asked, although the question is clearly important. 

One of the bill’s author’s Valery Patskan pointed out that the mere existence of the article provides a lever of pressure on prisoners, and the possibility of imposing criminal liability for an unmade bed or changing where you sleep without permission.

The bill was put to the vote on July 12.  It was telling that nobody voted against it, however 8 MPs abstained, and 112 did not take part in the vote.  With only 188 votes for, it was rejected.  Whatever the latest reason is for MPs blocking the parliamentary tribune, it cannot compensate for their irresponsible failure to do what they have been elected for and remove a Soviet anomaly allowing unwarranted imprisonment.

 Share this