war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Political Deals over Human Rights Ombudsman jeopardize Judicial Reform in UkraineRPR: Party quotas must not be applied in appointing new Human Rights CommissionerChildren illegally taken from Russian-occupied Ukraine to ‘train’ with army in Belarus Ukrainian prisoner dies after savage beating by prison staff and refusal to provide medical care Russia stages illegal raids against Ukrainians as supposed 'foreigners' in occupied Ukraine Volodymyr Panasenko, victim of Ukraine’s most egregious miscarriage of justice, freed after over 16 yearsMoscow planned the forced deportation of Ukrainians to Russia even before its full-scale invasionMoscow moves to legislate forced deportation of Ukrainians from occupied territory to Russia Ukrainian volunteer tortured by Russian FSB to fake evidence for ‘international terrorism’ show trial Russia to deport Ukrainians who reject Russian citizenship from occupied Ukraine as ‘foreigners’ Russia is risking the life of imprisoned Ukrainian civic journalist on hunger strike Invaders seize and imprison former Ukrainian soldier, then kidnap his three children to Russia ‘for adoption’Ukraine to leave European Ombudsman in protest over Ukrainian children being sent from Austria to Russia Russia deports Ukrainian children to orphanage in occupied Crimea condemned as a ‘concentration camp’Ukrainian works of literature and history banned as ‘extremist’ in Russian occupied Luhansk oblast Russia abducted, usually tortured, over a thousand civilians, including children in Kherson oblast alone Russia's forced deportation of Ukrainian children is genocide with identifiable perpetrators Ukraine’s penitentiary institutions and the warZelensky urged to veto law that puts Ukraine on track for more damning European Court judgments While bombing Zaporizhzhia, the invaders announce plans to take Ukrainian children to Russia for ‘rehabilitation’

Politicians jeopardize role of main human rights body in Ukraine

Halya Coynash
Three of Ukraine’s main parties have put forward ‘their own’ candidates for the now vacant post of Ukrainian Human Rights Ombudsperson, and human rights groups are up in arms. There can be no political quotas or wheeling-dealing about a person appointed to protect all citizens’ rights in the country, they insist

Three of Ukraine’s main parties have put forward ‘their own’ candidates for the now vacant post of Ukrainian Human Rights Ombudsperson, and human rights groups are up in arms.  There can be no political quotas or wheeling-dealing about a person appointed to protect all citizens’ rights in the country, they insist and demand that the country’s legislators consult with civil society in putting forward suitable candidates. 

Valeria Lutkovska’s 5-year tenure ended in April, and a new Ombudsperson, or Parliamentary Human Rights Commissioner, must soon be chosen.  The relevant parliamentary committee is due to meet on May 24 to consider the candidacy of two MPs, put forward by their respective parties: Serhiy Alexeev, proposed by the Bloc of Petro Poroshenko and Ludmila Denisova, the choice of the People’s Front.  Oleh Lyashko, leader of the Radical Party, has proposed a third candidate -  Andriy Mamalyty.

Human rights groups will be marking the occasion with a street performance outside the Verkhovna Rada Committees building.  The activists plan to highlight the dangers of an ‘Ombudsperson on a political leash’. 

Ukraine’s Law on the Human Rights Ombudsperson does stipulate that the person may not be an elected representative or hold any post in executive bodies. They are also expressly prohibited from being a member of any political party. 

All as it should be, except for one ‘but’.  Article 8 of the Law goes on to say that such incompatible features must be removed within 10 days of their appointment.  A person who stood for election and has acted as an MP for a particular party need now only withdraw from the party and resign from their position within the designated timeframe.  

This means that a political party is not by law prevented from electing one of their own members to this post.  It also provides no safeguards against totally non-transparent deals being drawn between different political factions.

Where does this leave the role of a person called upon to defend the rights of all Ukrainians, regardless of their political views? 

Only two people have thus far held the post: Nina Karpachova, from 1998 to 2012, and Valeria Lutkovska up till the present.  In both cases, there have been issues, either over their active political engagement, in Karpachova’s case, or in their role under the regime of Viktor Yanukovych, in Lutkovska’s.

This is the first election of an Ombudsperson since Euromaidan.  For the moment, there is nothing to suggest that parliamentarians understand that the Ombudsperson is there to serve all citizens, and not part of the power-sharing arrangements within the coalition. 

Many human rights groups have established fruitful forms of cooperation with the Ombudsperson’s Secretariat over the past three years and they are determined to uphold the independence of this post.

On May 10, the Human Rights Agenda, a coalition of different human rights NGOs, issued a statement demanding an open competition for the post of Ombudsperson.  They stress that in accordance with the UN Paris Principles, this appointment should be made through procedure which safeguards pluralist representation of civil society engaged in human rights defence. They are convinced that it is only through a fair and open competition that the independence, stipulated in the Law, of the Ombudsperson can be ensured.

The human rights NGOs categorically reject political appointments and ‘party quotas’ on a question which will determine state policy on human rights in Ukraine.

Freedom House has since added its voice, urging the Verkhovna Rada “to consider a wide range of candidates and to consult closely with civil society, postponing the formal parliamentary vote if necessary”.   Its spokesperson, Marc Behrendt notes that this institution “has significantly contributed to improving human rights in Ukraine and deserves a careful, open selection process”. 

All civic NGOs are agreed that the Ombudsperson must be independent and have the support and participation of civil society.  It remains to be seen whether Ukraine’s legislators sit up and pay heed.  

 Share this