war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Ukraine’s Security Service plans laws to criminalize ‘propaganda’ & fight pro-Russian fifth columnSBU ‘treason’ probe and search at Yandex Ukraine to justify contentious ban?Why block VKontakte when it provides evidence of Russian war crimes in Ukraine?Ukraine should use Russian social media for the International Criminal Court, not ban them‘Ukrainian regional news site’ linked with Putin Chef’s Internet troll factoryKremlin’s Russia Today exposed as Russia’s richest, least transparent ‘NGO’More needed than 8-man ‘task force’ against lethal Russian state propagandaBlood on their Hands: Servicing Russia’s TV Propaganda MachineAnother Ukrainian prisoner tortured for Russian TVMoscow prevents captured Russian POWs from contacting their familiesRussian protesters demand withdrawal of Russian soldiers from UkraineNemtsov report exposes Kremlin lies and western pretence on DonbasNemtsov Report Says More Than 200 Russian Soldiers Killed In Ukraine WarNemtsov Allies Press U.S. To Punish Russian ’Propagandists’In Memory of Boris Nemtsov – Minute of NON-SilenceThe Anti-Semitic Coding in Putin’s Telegram to Boris Nemtsov’s MotherBoris Nemtsov: Yes, I’m afraid that Putin will kill meUkrainian lawmakers propose Russian-style Internet restrictions in the name of ‘national security’Draft law enabling the blocking of Internet sites must be withdrawnLegal Opinion on the political motives of the criminal prosecution and violations of human rights in criminal proceedings of Konstantin Zhevago

Ukrainian legislators propose scary Russia style restrictions on freedom of expression

Halya Coynash

Media and human rights groups have reacted with alarm to two draft bills which, in the name of protecting national security, propose some seriously disturbing restrictions which are reminiscent of those applied in Russia.  They have called on the authors of the two bills to withdraw them, and point out that democracy is impossible in any countries whose authorities arbitrarily restrict freedom of expression.   

No. 6676 was tabled on July 10, with No. 6688 following two days later.  Both are titled “On amendments to some legislative acts on countering threats to national security in the information sphere’, and have virtually identical norms.  They are, however, supposedly the work of two different groups of MPs (each time from the Bloc of President Petro Poroshenko and People’s Front), and are not presented as two alternative versions.

Both bills would allow for temporary blocking or restriction of access to information resources and / or Internet portals without a court order, on the authority of a prosecutor, investigator or the National Council for Security and Defence.  

The Human Rights Ombudsperson Valeria Lutkovska, Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union and Kharkiv Human Rights Group issued a joint statement on July 13 in which they pointed to the dangerous broadening of the concept of ‘technological terrorism’ proposed.  Both draft bills wish to extend the concept of technological terrorism to include action “aimed at infringing public safety; intimidating the population;  provoking military conflict, international difficulties; influencing decision-making, the carrying out of actions or inaction of public authorities or local self-government bodies by officials of those bodies, civic associations, legal entities to attract public attention to the specific political, religious or other views of the perpetrator (terrorist)”.

This would mean, they point out, that any discussion about the decisions of the authorities aimed at influencing such decisions, that is, a vital part of democracy, were it to use the Internet, could be deemed ‘technological terrorism’. This is a grave encroachment upon one of the fundamental roles of the media, namely to draw attention to the failings, omissions, etc. of the authorities, and therefore, upon the right to freedom of expression.  The draft bills are therefore in breach of Ukraine’s Constitution (Article 34) and of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Media representatives warned that both bills would jeopardize the free development of the Internet in Ukraine and create the danger of websites being arbitrarily blocked without court orders.  In fact, such blocks without a court ruling would only be for two days, however this is clearly a dangerous precedent.

The bills propose new duties for operators and providers regarding such blocks, with fines envisaged if they failed to comply.

The authors accept that at a time of military conflict, the state may need to impose certain restrictions on freedom of the Internet for Ukraine’s security.  These must, however, be legitimate, and here, they say, the authors of the bills have assumed both the methods and approach of the aggressor, namely the Russian Federation, on regulating the Internet.

The authors call for the bills to be withdrawn and for civic organizations that are not involved in business or linked to political parties to be invited for public discussion on legislative initiatives aimed at regulating the Internet.

This is not the first time that restrictive measures are being proposed with the justification be

 Share this