MENU
Documenting
war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Sentenced to 17 years in Siberia for opposing Russia's invasion and affirming that Crimea is Ukraine Armed raid and surreal charges in Russian attempt to silence renowned Crimean Tatar journalist and Crimean Solidarity coordinator Lutfiye Zutfiyeva Your families will suffer too: No limits to Russia’s persecution of Crimean Tatars and other Ukrainians Russia outlaws major Crimean Tatar human rights group which exposes its repression and calls for liberation of Crimea Russia has turned Crimea into a huge prison for political prisoners and hostages from Kherson and Zaporizhzhia oblastsHorrific sentences against Crimean Solidarity journalists for telling the world of Russia’s crimes in occupied Crimea Russia moves to confiscate possessions for condemning its war against Ukraine or for opposing occupation of Crimea Russia had at least 28 torture chambers in Kharkiv oblast, imprisoning and torturing even schoolchildrenRussia bans greeting ‘Glory to Ukraine’, labelling it ‘Nazi’ Almost 600 Ukrainians prosecuted for ‘discrediting’ Russian invading forces by supporting Ukraine in occupied Crimea Crimean Tatar journalist and activists face huge sentences in Russia’s retaliation for humiliating attack by Ukraine Russia frees criminals, sentences Crimean Tatar civic journalist to 11 years for moral integrityArmed searches and surreal charges against Crimean Tatar Imam for leading prayers in Russian-occupied Crimea ”I’m no criminal’. Ukrainian artist sentenced to 15 years for protesting Russia's war against Ukraine refuses to wear prison uniform Russia refuses critically ill Crimean Tatar political prisoner vital heart medication Russian invaders vandalize and plunder remembrance of Holodomor in occupied Ukraine Russian justice: murderers pardoned for killing Ukrainians, Crimean Tatas sentenced to 17 years for defending political prisoners European Broadcasting Union study exposes “brutal Russification” in Russian-occupied Ukraine Court in Russia reduces charge against Crimean Tatar political prisoner but retains appalling sentence Russia seeks to strip a fourth lawyer of his licence after jailing him for defending Ukrainian political prisoners

Mustafa Dzhemilev: Russian methods of repression in Crimea worse than Soviet times

16.01.2018   
Halya Coynash
Mustafa Dzhemilev says that the armed searches that Russia’s FSB carry out now in occupied Crimea are far worse than those of their Soviet predecessors. This is not the first time that the veteran Crimean Tatar leader who spent 15 years in the Soviet political labour camps, has pointed to a level of lawlessness under Russian occupation which goes beyond that of the Soviet totalitarian regime

Mustafa Dzhemilev says that the armed searches that Russia’s FSB carry out now in occupied Crimea are far worse than those of their Soviet predecessors.  This is not the first time that the veteran Crimean Tatar leader who spent 15 years in the Soviet political labour camps, has pointed to a level of lawlessness under Russian occupation which goes beyond that of the Soviet totalitarian regime. 

At a recent press briefing, Dzhemilev explained that in Soviet times, there were searches too, however there was certain procedure which was followed.  A court warrant would be produced and the people would be told that the search was because of information that they had ‘anti-Soviet literature’. 

Under Russia’s illegal occupation of Crimea, there are very often no warrants.  Armed men in masks surround a building and then burst in, forcing people to the floor with their hands behind their backs and proceeding to turn everything upside down.  They claim to be searching for weapons or banned literature, though Dzhemilev says that the FSB often have no idea themselves what it is that they’re looking for.

They take whatever they don’t understand, he says.  If it’s not in Russian, for example, they’ll take it away, as well as the contents of the person’s computers.  There have also been cases where money was stolen during such visitations.

In fact, the situation is often even worse than Dzhemliev described, with the armed men who turn up bearing no insignia to identify them.  Given the number of abductions and enforced disappearances of Crimean Tatars and civic activists, it is no wonder that rights lawyers have begun warning Crimean Tatars to be vigilant when they hear of such ‘anonymous’ searches.   The men who turned up at the home of Renat Paralamov and his family were not in uniform, and the two men who had FSB insignia on their clothes tried to hide it when a large number of neighbours and friends arrived.   

Paralamov was taken away and savagely tortured before being dumped at a bus station the following day. 

Unlike in Soviet times, where it was opposition to the regime that drew the KGB’s attention, now in Crimea any Crimean Tatar can feel at risk of such treatment.  Such overt terrorization of the population is almost certainly the objective behind many of the armed searches. 

Such tactics began within months of Russia’s invasion and annexation of Crimea, with Crimean Tatar homes, mosques and even madrasas (religious educational institutions) being targeted

The arrests of people on politically motivated charges or for their faith began in January 2015, and have ever since been accompanied by such armed searches, often carried out with gratuitous violence in homes where children had been fast asleep.

All searches tend to begin very early in the morning, with whole areas sometimes cordoned off.  Since effectively anybody could be targeted, the uncertainty when men are taken away must be agonizing.  Will they be released, or end up, as have many indefinitely imprisoned and facing grotesque ‘terrorism’ charges over alleged and unproven involvement in the Hizb ut-Tahrir party which is legal in Ukraine and in no way ‘terrorist’?

Methods of intimidation, including unwarranted administrative fines and imprisonment imposed by Russian-controlled courts, increased sharply in 2017 with those circulating information about the latest searches or simply standing nearby in solidarity, themselves targeted.

Although Soviet prisons and labour camps were notorious for their lawlessness, Mustafa Dzhemilev believes that the conditions for political prisoners held in occupied Crimea are even worse.  In Soviet times, they seldom directly used torture against dissidents, mainly because of the likely publicity., though they would find less open methods for making their lives in the camps intolerable.  Dzhemilev says that he has spoken with prisoners held in the SIZO [remand prison] in Simferopol who tell him that everything is more brutal and lawless now.  As reported, the very conditions in this SIZO are bad enough to constitute torture, and the occupation regime is currently holding two political prisoners – Bekir Degermendzhy and Asan Chapukh - in conditions which may be putting their very lives in danger.

As mentioned, Mustafa Dzhemilev began warning the world that the Russian occupation regime was at least more lawless than its Soviet predecessor very early on.  In March 2015, he told the UN Security Council that people are afraid to speak with others, with fear ruling their lives  in Russian-occupied Crimea.

Russia had failed to find a figure like Ramsan Kadyrov, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s protégé in Chechnya, among the Crimean Tatars, Dzhemlev said, and had turned to repression instead.

It has continued in this vein, with the deterioration of all rights which Mustafa Dzhemilev reported back in 2015 now even more extreme. 

Perhaps the only positive development over the last year or so has been that the UN General Assembly, the OSCE and European institutions have stopped hiding behind  circumspect euphemisms.  They all speak unequivocally of Russia’s illegal occupation of Crimea and of flagrant human rights violations.  The International Criminal Court’s Chief Prosecutor has clearly stated that Russia’s occupation of Crimea is to be viewed as an international armed conflict (falling under its jurisdiction).  The UN International Court of Justice not only accepted Ukraine’s claim against Russia over its discrimination of Crimean Tatars and ethnic Ukrainians, but also imposed provisional measures against such discrimination. 

All of this is important, but more is undoubtedly needed to stop the ever-mounting spiral of repression and terror under Russian occupation. 

 

 

 

 Share this