MENU
Documenting
war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Crucial EU Initiative that Outs Kremlin Lies Under FireRussian propaganda fakes ‘praise for Hitler’ by Ukrainian Speaker ParubiyRussian state TV caught using fake ‘disillusioned Ukrainian Maidan activist’Ukraine’s elections declared ‘rigged’ by country that knows President’s name years in advanceCrimean radio enthusiast with a flag of Ukraine sentenced to 12 years on fake ‘spying’ charges Putin visits Mariupol in propaganda stunt by night to conceal how Russia has destroyed the cityRussian court jails soldier for admitting to proven war crimes in Ukraine Teachers, colleagues, neighbours face Soviet era denunciations for opposing war against Ukraine in occupied Crimea and Russia Nobel Peace Prize laureate Ales Bialiatski and his Viasna colleagues sentenced to heavy prison terms in BelarusRussia will force parents to attend war propaganda classes about its ‘liberation of Ukraine’Ukrainians tortured into ‘confessing’ to killing collaborators in Russian-occupied BerdianskRussia forces parents in occupied Ukraine to take Russian citizenship or lose their childrenDisabled Kherson volunteer tortured by Russian invaders for insane propaganda confession to ‘spying for Ukraine’ ‘Cities speak’ — Digest of Russian ProtestsRussia challenged over Crimean Tatar civic journalist’s death sentenceRussia demands 18-year sentence for blind and disabled Ukrainian political prisoner on grotesque ‘terrorism’ charges Ukrainian works of literature and history banned as ‘extremist’ in Russian occupied Luhansk oblast Russia opens new prison for Ukrainian political prisoners abducted from Kherson and Zaporizhzhia oblasts Russian invaders torture and 'deport' Ukrainians for ‘extremist’ suport for Ukraine in Zaporizhzhia oblast Russia abducts and tortures Kherson official and his family for serving Ukraine

Russian state TV uses old film footage to ‘prove’ chemical attack in Syria was faked

25.04.2018   
Halya Coynash

Two Russian state-controlled channels have used shots from a 2016 feature film as part of ‘evidence’ to back Moscow’s claim that the chemical attack in the Syrian town of Douma was staged.  Russia’s Defence Ministry is asserting that Britain was involved in ‘faking’ the chemical attack which is believed to have killed at least 60, including many children.

The Russian-faked ‘evidence’ was spotted by the independent TV Dozhd channel which reports that news broadcasts on both Pyervy Kanal [Channel One] and Rossiya 1 used film footage shot by Humam Husari, a young Syrian-born filmmaker in 2016.  The film was aimed at attracting international attention to the victims of the 2013 sarin gas attack near Damascus.  It follows a rebel fighter whose wife and child were killed in the chemical attack, and is forced himself to take up arms against an attack from government forces.

This was, understandably, not the impression that the two Russian channels gave.  On 22 April, in the Pyervy Kanal news report, the reader stated that “western politicians and the press are ignoring obvious evidence that there was no chemical attack in the Syrian town of Douma”.

Against a background of shots from Husari’s film, the reader continues with the words: “Testimony has appeared from witnesses, they also say that the video shots taken by rebel fighters in the hospital were staged”. 

The same footage was shown on the weekly news roundup [«Вести недели»] with Dmitry Kiselyov on 22 April.  A person who is presented as part of the film crew says that “we also filmed how children in the block were thrown away, some in cars, some near them or under cars.  All had supposedly been killed, and their faces were yellow”.

A simple comparison of the specific shots makes the fake quite clear. 

None of this is at all new to those who followed the propaganda warfare which Russia unleashed against Ukraine in 2014.  There was a constant barrage of claims that Ukraine was using phosphorous bombs, was bombing whole villages, etc., with the footage taken from films or from wars in other countries.

In June 2014, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov proposed urgent UN Security Resolutions on the situation in Ukraine.  The ’evidence’ he claimed proved Ukraine’s use of phosphorous bombs in fact dated back to Iraq in 2004.  On another occasion, the footage from the North Caucuses was pulled out as ‘proof’ of supposed Ukrainian atrocities in Donbas.

The list of gaffes where a supposed ‘victim’ of Ukrainian ‘fascists’ on one channel was shown as the perpetrator on another, is also long.

It should be stressed that all of this was coordinated at a higher level.  According to former employees, the channels’ management got their orders directly from people in the President’s Administration.

There is also close coordination between the Russian state media and the FSB, with fake footage produced on television to pretend that ‘terrorists’ have been arrested, rather than Crimean Tatar activists.

The propaganda machine goes into overdrive where Russia, or its close partners like Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, are suspected of grave war crimes, such as the downing of Malaysian MH17 with the use of a Russian BUK missile, the nerve gas attack on Sergei Skripal and his daughter in the UK, and chemical attacks in Syria.

After the first reports of a chemical attack on Douma, Russia accused the renowned Syrian medics known as the White Helmets of having used actors.  It later tried to claim that the substance used had been dust, not chlorine.

It should be remembered that all these stories swirl around while it is Russia that has blocked an international investigation through its veto in the UN Security Council.

As part of its aggressive disinformation tactics against Britain after the nerve gas attack, Russia has singled Britain out as particular ‘villain’ in its claims that the attack in Douma was faked. The approach, backed by faked ‘evidence’ such as that above, is almost certainly effective for a domestic audience.  Such claims also have an impact abroad.  Even those who don’t believe them, are still duped into believing that there are different ‘versions’, rather than the truth vs. brazen lies.

 Share this