Russian court passes huge sentences for involvement in non-existent “Network”
In a case frighteningly reminiscent of Stalin’s Terror, 7 young men have received sentences from 6 to 18 years for supposed involvement in a ’Network’ ("Сеть") that almost certainly never existed. Most of the defendants and witnesses have described the extreme torture which made them willing to sign any document put in front of them.
27-year-old Dmitry Pchelintsev
Some of the men did not even known each other, though all shared anti-fascist and anarchist views. Some of them were also involved in helping taking food to the homeless. A lot of the supposed ‘evidence’ for the allegedly terrorist ‘Network’ came from the young men’s airsoft matches.
The FSB have long used torture to force confessions, but normally to involvement in something that does genuinely exist. Here the only evidence of either the organization or of involvement in it came from the testimony of a man who received a suspiciously light sentence in an earlier criminal case and ‘confessions’ from the defendants which most have retracted and said were given under torture. Despite detailed accounts of electric shocks and other torture methods, visual signs of torture and the lack of any other proof, the Investigative Committee has refused to initiate criminal charges and the public prosecutor demanded and the court handed down huge sentences.
11 young men from Penza and St. Petersburg were arrested from October 2017 to January 2018. They were accused of being part of something called ‘Network’. Russia’s FSB claimed that this was a terrorist organization which was planning to violently overthrow the regime by attacking law enforcement officers, military recruitment officers; the ruling ‘United Russia’ party, etc. The FSB’s original claim was that the young men had planned “to destabilize the situation in the country” through terrorist acts during the presidential elections and World Cup which Russia hosted in the summer of 2018.
The defendants shared anarchist and anti-fascist views, seemingly vegetarianism and a love for airsoft games. What the prosecution claims were ‘terrorist activities’, the defendants and their lawyers call airsoft matches, and anarchist meetings.
Prominent human rights organizations like Memorial Human Rights Centre and ‘For Human Rights’ have long pointed to the lack of any evidence that ‘Network’ even existed and the testimony of most of the men about the brutal torture that forced them to sign whatever ‘confessions’ were put in front of them.
Two of the men from Penza - Dmitry Pchelintsev and Ilya Shakursky have been designated the leaders of ‘Network’ and are charged, under Article 205.4
It seems likely, Memorial believes, that Zorin’s second arrest was merely a pretext to begin wide-reaching repression against anarchists and anti-fascists. The criminal case over the supposed creation of ‘Network’ was initiated the following day, 18 October 2017, with the above-mentioned defendants arrested over the coming days.
Zorin was not charged with ‘terrorism’ on the grounds that he had voluntarily ceased his involvement, informed the authorities of the alleged organization and testified against the others. He also received an unusually light (suspended) sentence over the first charges.
The role which Zorin appears to have played has had many analogies in Russian-occupied Crimea, with the methods used described in detail by at least two Crimean Tatars (Renat Paralamov and Dinar Minadirov) who withstood the torture, but were forced to flee to mainland Ukraine.
The FSB clearly wanted a wider ‘Network’, and in January 2018, three anti-fascists from St. Petersburg: Yuri Boyarshinov; Viktor Filinkov and Igor Shishkin were arrested. Boyarshinov and Filinkov, as well as Ilya Kapustin, a young man who had witness status, and who has since received political asylum in Finland, also gave accounts of torture. Members of a civic monitoring committee saw bruises and cuts on Shishkin’s body, suggesting that he was also subjected to the same treatment.
It is possible that the FSB were hoping to add anarchists from occupied Crimea to their ‘terrorist plot’. There were a number of armed searches at around the same time, with one man – Yevhen Karakashev – arrested and savagely beaten on 1 February 2018. He was later sentenced to six years on bizarre ‘terrorism’ charges based on social media posts.
Most of the ‘Network’ defendants have said that they signed ‘confessions’ under torture, with the accounts given by Pchelintsev; Shakursky and others truly harrowing. Both Pchelintsev and Shakursky say that electric shocks were applied, and Pchelintsev was also suspended upside down.
“They started saying “You’re the leader”. To stop the torture, I answered, “Yes, I’m the leader”. “You planned to carry out terrorist acts”. I answered, “Yes, we planned to carry out terrorist acts”, Pchelintsev recounts.
Memorial HRC says there is considerable evidence that both the defendants and ‘witnesses’ in the Penza case were systematically tortured. Four of the men: Pchelintsev; Shakursky; Chernov and Sagynbayev spoke of the torture during the pre-trial investigation and retracted their ‘confessions’ in court. Kuksov’s wife told the court that during the ‘search’ in which the FSB allegedly found a pistol and bullets, her husband was covered in blood and bruises. Four witnesses also retracted their testimony in court, saying that they had given it after savage beatings.
The torture methods used against the three St. Petersburg men were also documented by civic monitors.
“It is thus possible to state that the ‘Network case’, both its Penza and its St. Petersburg parts, is based entirely on torture and on the resulting testimony from the accused and witnesses.“ , Memorial writes, pointing out that such illegally obtained testimony is inadmissible.
Memorial adds that the investigation largely seemed to twist objective facts in order to fit the FSB officers conspiratory theory. The description that the FSB have come up with for the training sessions and division of roles of the alleged ‘Network’ are, in fact, much more reminiscent of a group playing airsoft sport in teams than of a terrorist organization.
The claim that a small group of young men with left-wing views and no obvious psychological or social aberrations should have seriously been planning to overturn the political regime in Russia, Memorial says, seems wildly implausible and akin to fantasy. The FSB originally claimed that the participants in the alleged ‘Network’ had been planning terrorist acts for the World Cup in the summer of 2018, however in the final indictment, any mention of this vanished, leaving only planned ‘crimes’ in the vague and distant future. The only real things in this case are the long sentences passed by the Volga District Military Court in Penza on 10 February.