war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Bizarre 'motives' concocted to imprison renowned Memorial Head for opposing Russia's war against Ukraine New attempt to imprison Memorial Head for ‘disrupting civil society’ by condemning Russia’s war against UkraineRussians abduct and doubtless torture Ukrainian journalist and her husband in occupied MelitopolVolodymyr Panasenko, victim of Ukraine’s most egregious miscarriage of justice, freed after over 16 yearsECHR finds Ukraine in violation over life prisoner tortured into confessing to somebody else’s crime Eight months of abductions and torture, as Russia’s terrorism intensifies at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plantZelensky urged to veto law that puts Ukraine on track for more damning European Court judgments Ukraine hammered by Court in Strasbourg for endless torture of life prisoners Russian Supreme Court refuses to review horrific sentence against historian of the Soviet Terror Yury Dmitriev despite glaring violations Vital chance for justice after Ukrainian Constitutional Court ruling Zelensky fails crucial test for restoring justice in Ukraine A brief description of the KHPG strategic litigations in the first half of 2021Prisoners’ rights to health protection and medical care in 2014-2021: KHPG reportPosthumous justice for Ukraine’s most famous victim of police tortureUkraine’s most malicious miscarriages of justiceA brief description of the KHPG strategic litigations in July–December 2020The practice of application of Article 111 of the Criminal Code of UkraineUkraine found in bulk violation of the prohibition of torture over denial of justice to life prisonersOpinion on the political motives of criminal persecution and violation of human rights in the case of Sergiy PashinskyUkrainian life sentence – because they needed to arrest somebody

Viktor Lozinsky, the ex-MP convicted of murder, wins in local elections in Ukraine

Halya Coynash
While popular support for a person convicted of murder is certainly baffling, other questions are at least as pertinent, not least how Viktor Lozinsky was freed after serving a very small part of his sentence. His case contrasts dramatically to those of a number of prisoners whose life sentences arouse well-founded doubts

Viktor Lozinsky, a former MP sentenced in 2009 to 15 years’ imprisonment for murder was elected head of a Kirovohrad oblast united territory community during the local elections on 25 October.  While popular support for a person convicted of such a serious crime is certainly baffling, other questions are at least as pertinent, not least how Lozinsky was able to be released after serving a very small part of his sentence and to then have the slate wiped clean. This is when a large number of Ukrainians have spent years imprisoned on similar charges, but with considerably less proof of guilt.  

Lozinsky was convicted in 2011 of the murder of 55-year-old Valery Oliynyk on 16 June 2009.  His victim was unfortunate enough to come upon Lozinsky while the latter was out hunting with Yevhen Horbenko, the then prosecutor of the Holovanivsk district and Mykhailo Kovalsky, at the time the chief of the district police department.

At the time of the murder, Lozinsky was an MP from the Bloc of Yulia Tymoshenko.  The high status of all those involved in the senseless killing and the belief that Lozinsky had been behaving like some kind of feudal lord prompted public outrage, and withdrawal of support from the Bloc, and on 3 July 2009, the Verkhovna Rada stripped Lozinsky of his parliamentary immunity.  Although this was officially at Lozinsky’s own request, he promptly went into hiding and was only arrested finally on 1 March 2010.

Lozinsky was sentenced in April 2011 to 15 years’ imprisonment, and Horbenko to 9 years, with Kovalsky receiving a 5-year suspended sentence. Lozinsky’s sentence was reduced at appeal level to 14 years.  In March 2013 the High Specialized Court on Civil and Criminal Cases reduced Lozinsky’s sentence from 14 to 10 years imprisonment, apparently finding some extenuating circumstances.

Then in June 2014, it was learned that Lozinsky had been released ‘on health grounds’.  Health-related early release is possible in Ukraine, but usually applied only where a person is close to death.  In this case, the State Penitentiary Service’s doctors had made no recommendation for Lozinsky’s release, however a panel of judges, under presiding judge Serhiy Vozynyk, from the Boryspil City-District Court, chose to consider “a specialized medical assessment” and order his release.  The assessment gave a whole range of supposed medical conditions, including a serious cardiovascular disorder.  The case elicited a lot of public attention and Lozinsky ended up back in custody

In February 2016, Lozinsky received early release on the basis of the so-called Savchenko law which counted 1 day in SIZO [remand prison, where the conditions are very bad] to be the same as 1.5 days of the actual sentence.  It was announced in March that the prosecutor had appealed against the early release, and the then Prosecutor General Yuri Lutsenko even asserted in April 2017 that the High Specialist Court had overturned the early release.  It is not at all clear what happened to that ruling, which should have been final, since Losinsky appears to have been at liberty since 2016.

This only became clear because scrutinized the Single Register of Court Rulings and found that on 6 May 2019, the Dniprovsky District Court in Kyiv had cancelled Lozinsky’s criminal record, with the ruling stating that over three years had passed since Lozinsky’s early release.  During this time, Lozinsky was said to have created a new business linked with the agricultural industry, with the judge finding that this gave grounds to consider that Lozinsky’s “exemplary behaviour and conscientious attitude demonstrated his reform”.

After going into hiding to avoid arrest, Lozinsky finally spent less than six years in custody for murder.  He clearly never lost his influence in the area he is from, and has now been elected head of the Pidvysoke territorial community [Підвисоцька громада] in the Holovanivsk district of the Kirovohrad oblast.  

None of the methods by which Lozinsky came to be freed very early and have his criminal record wiped were at all inevitable.  His case stands in glaring contrast to those of up to 100 life prisoners in Ukraine, who are believed by human rights organizations to be serving sentences for crimes they did not commit, or that are disproportionately harsh.   These include Volodymyr Panasenko who has already spent 14 years imprisoned on the basis of four varying ‘confessions’ given by a man who stated clearly at both Panasenko’s first trial, and then at appeal stage, that he had testified against Panasenko under psychological and physical pressure. The shocking nature of this case, and Panasenko’s ongoing imprisonment were reported to parliament by the first Human Rights Ombudsperson, Nina Karpachova and have been publicly noted by Ukraine’s first President, Leonid Kravchuk.  Despite this, nothing has been done to ensure his release, while two of the men responsible for his sentence have received promotion. 

See: Ukrainian life sentence – because they needed to arrest somebody

There are also extremely strong grounds for believing that a miscarriage of justice has been committed in the case of Maxim Orlov.  He was sentenced to life imprisonment for a double murder around the same time as Lozinsky’s murder, however in his case, the only evidence came from a 14-year-old, interrogated by the police without a lawyer or his family being present.

See: Maxim Orlov - zero evidence but sentenced to life for good statistics

There are similar concerns about the life sentence which Mykola Slyvotsky is serving.

See:  Life sentence for a crime somebody else admitted to

It is too late for justice to be served in some cases, such as life prisoner and victim of torture, Oleksandr Rafalsky, who died in mysterious circumstances, aged just 46 in 2016.

These are just a very small number of the cases from the past which arouse well-founded concerns.  Ukrainian legislators have failed for years now to take the simple step needed to enable judicial review in such cases.  Not open the prison doors, just give men a chance to justice.

 Share this