Menu
• Penal institutions
Andriy Didenko, 18 November 2025

The Court of Appeal frees Viktor Sleptsov: a decision that should have been made immediately

The Vinnytsia Oblast Court of Appeal, presided over by Judge Serhiy Medvetskyi, ruled to release Viktor Sleptsov—a 68-year-old lifer with stage IV cancer.

Viktor Sleptsov, photo: Andriy DidenkoThis is the right and just decision. But it is long overdue.

Procedural delays led to a sharp deterioration in his condition

The case for Sleptsov’s release was dragged out by the court of first instance from August until the end of October; hearings were postponed, and the court demanded a ‘histology’, which cannot be performed on a terminal patient and contradicts the practice of the ECHR.

It was precisely these delays that caused Sleptsov’s condition to deteriorate sharply: he lost the ability to move, is suffocating in a cell without ventilation, and lives in constant pain. In such cases, time is not a procedural resource. It is the difference between a chance and death.

Such decisions must be made within 48 hours

European practice is clear: when treatment is impossible under conditions of imprisonment, release must be immediate.

In European countries, a model of compassionate release operates—a legal mechanism for the early release of seriously or terminally ill prisoners on compassionate grounds, where the deciding factor is not the diagnosis, but the incompatibility of continued detention with human dignity.

In Ukraine, however, hundreds of people die in prison even before their first court hearing. That is why a mandatory 48-hour review period is needed—a mechanism that can genuinely protect the lives of the seriously ill.

Today’s decision—an important step, but not reform

The Court of Appeal:

● overturned Judge Haidu’s cruel decision,

● upheld the doctors’ conclusions,

● in effect, fulfilled the ECHR’s requirement to protect a person from inhuman treatment.

However, the system will continue to keep people in torment if we do not abandon the outdated ‘List of Diseases’ and move to a European model where the focus is on the individual, their condition, and their dignity.

Conclusion

Viktor Sleptsov should have been released immediately after the conclusion of the Medical Consultative Commission (MCC).

Today, justice has been restored—but at the cost of his health and months of additional suffering.

Compassion cannot wait. For the seriously ill have no time.



share the information

Similar articles

• Penal institutions

Prison medicine: ways to humanize it

In the Kherson region, a prisoner falls under occupation and is taken to Russia, where he becomes seriously ill. The aggressor state releases him on health grounds, but at home, the native penitentiary system locks him up again, barely alive. Let’s find out what is wrong with the Ukrainian procedure for release from prison due to illness.

• Penal institutions

Mobilization of convicts: Pros and cons

On January 19, 2024, the Verkhovna Rada registered draft law No. 10419, which allows amnesty for specific categories of prisoners. On condition that they go to the frontline.

• Penal institutions

‘They just killed him’ — Vitaliy Matukhno, an inmate suffering from cancer, died in the prison hospital

According to human rights activist Andriy Didenko, “Vitaliy was killed consciously and intentionally because, for them, a human being is a trash.” Andriy tells the story of a life prisoner who should have been released for health reasons but was left behind bars to die.

• Penal institutions

Ukraine’s penitentiary institutions and the war

With the onset of Russia’s all-out war against Ukraine some of the country’s most vulnerable institutions, its detention centres and corrective colonies, found themselves in a precarious position. This article examines the past and present situation of Ukraine’s penitentiary system and recommends legal and practical measures for its greater safety.