Menu
• War crimes
31 January 2023
available: українською

Statement concerning HRW report on the use of landmines in Ukraine

We are convinced that posting of such a report may bring more significant harm than benefits. We attempted to stop this by contacting HRW. However, our efforts were in vain.

[human rights watch]

Today, Tuesday 31 January 2023, the international non-governmental organization Human Rights Watch (HRW) is to publish a report on the use of PFM-1 anti-personnel mines by the Ukrainian armed forces in the Izium area of the Kharkiv Region. The use of anti-personnel mines is prohibited by the Ottawa Convention. Ukraine has ratified the Convention; Russia has not.

On Sunday, 29 January 2023, we attempted to halt this publication by contacting HRW management. We proposed that we and Human Rights Watch should investigate the issue together, drawing on the knowledge and experience of Ukrainian sappers. Our efforts were in vain.

Regardless of the accuracy of the study, furthermore, the publication of such a report carries significant reputational risks for Ukraine.

Its appearance will undoubtedly affect the Ukrainian government’s efforts to ensure the supply of Western weapons. Human Rights Watch (like Amnesty International) enjoys substantial public credibility in Europe and the United States. Such reports tend to fuel Russian propaganda in the West and undermine public support for ongoing military assistance to Ukraine by Western governments.

A key principle of Freedom of Information states that information may be made publicly available when the harm from publication is less than the harm done by non-publication. When Ukraine is under sustained and relentless attack by a much more militarily-powerful country the publication of such a report, we are convinced, may bring more significant harm than benefits.

In proceeding to publish such a report, despite the stated concerns of Ukraine’s human-rights organizations, we feel that Human Rights Watch is supporting the aggressor, something we deeply regret and resent.

Yevhen Zakharov, Director of the Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group

Oleksandr Pavlichenko, Executive Director of the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union

share the information

Similar articles

• War crimes

Only Russia wins if there is no international investigation of its Olenivka mass killing of Ukrainian POWs

50 Ukrainian prisoners of war who had been moved to a new barracks at Olenivka according to a list of names, were either killed outright in an unexplained explosion or died as the direct result of the prison staff's denial of medical treatment

• War crimes

Ukrainian sentenced to 12 years for ‘endangering Russian security’ through donation to Ukraine’s defenders

Victor Nikitenko was 'accused' by the aggressor state which invaded Ukraine of seeking to help the men and women in defending his country

• War crimes

War crimes probe initiated after Russians interrogate, then execute Ukrainian POW

This is the latest of many killings of Ukrainian prisoners of war, with evidence mounting that Russian commanders encourage subordinates to "not take prisoners"

• War crimes

Two young Ukrainians sentenced to 15 & 20 years for fictitious ‘international terrorism’ near Russian-occupied Melitopol

Russian attempts to present railway partisans as ‘international terrorists’ would under any circumstances be absurd. They become even more surreal given the alleged reason why the sabotage didn’t work