war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Lviv Human Rights Defender Oleksiy Verentsov jailed for 3 days (updated)Human rights activists allege unlawful interference in their workUHHRU: Stop persecution of human rights activists!Ukrainian Human Rights Activist, Journalist Protest Police SearchesChilling silence after 22-year-old Crimean Tatar abducted by Russian FSB and vanishesRussian justice: murderers pardoned for killing Ukrainians, Crimean Tatas sentenced to 17 years for defending political prisoners Abducted and tortured Ukrainian writer and journalist Serhiy Tsyhipa sentenced to 13 years on surreal charges Move to criminalize protest over political and religious persecution in Russia and occupied Ukraine as ‘justification of extremism’Two years of open attack on Crimean Tatars, with even political prisoners' families and lawyers jailed Jan Rachinsky, chairman of the International ‘Memorial’ Society 22 Crimean Tatars, including the fathers of imprisoned Crimean Solidarity activists, jailed for trying to attend an ‘open court hearing’Russian FSB seize Crimean Tatar family’s last son in new wave of terror against Crimean Solidarity activistsDefender of Crimean Tatar political prisoners faces 7-year sentence for posts against Russia’s war against UkraineRussia bans school remembrance of victims of the Crimean Tatar Deportation as ‘provocation’Armed terror and threats of imprisonment, or worse, if Crimean Solidarity journalist doesn't stop reporting repression in Russian-occupied Crimea Russia carries out mass arrests, including of Crimean Solidarity Coordinator and journalist Lutfiye Zudiyeva Russia’s first Ukrainian political prisoner: ‘Russians know no limits in their use of torture’Russia detains and prosecutes elderly activists for flying the Crimean Tatar Flag Crimean Tatar prisoner of conscience and victim of FSB torture urgently hospitalized in Russia Russia sentences human rights defender to 14 years for helping political prisoners seek justice from ECHR

Police remove financial documents and computers from Vinnytsa Human Rights Group

The police had a court order to search the VHG Coordinator’s home, none at all to search the group, nor any legitimate grounds for removing material on defending refugees’ rights and other things

During a search officially of the home of Vinnytsa Human Rights Group coordinator, Dmytro Groisman, carried out on Friday, lasting until 2 a.m. that night, the police removed two leaflets from a German anti-AIDS foundation, promoting safe sex, and a video to check it for possible pornography.

Dmytro Groisman points out that his organization provides human rights assistance to women working in the sex industry, and they therefore have a lot of such leaflets.

The black and white film is of Dmytro’s child aged 1-2 (he is now 17). 

The search of his flat was carried out on the basis of a court order, officially over suspicion of circulating pornography in connection with a posting on his blog from 2 May ( )   The video clip, in seriously questionable taste (but not as seemingly related to child pornography as the image shown – translator, who had been rearing to complain to Youtube!) remains available on Youtube to this day.

All exceedingly distasteful, but even those who find the need to re-post such material questionable, must also ask why the search happened now, 6 months later, and – more importantly – why, armed with a court order to search a private flat, the police, without court sanction, also searched the human rights group’s offices and removed financial document and computers.  Papers removed included some almost ready to be passed to the court regarding a case defending refugees.

Mr Groisman believes the real aim of the search was to paralyze the group’s work on refugee rights. He says that the police make money out of providing “protection” over illegal migration.  He thinks they may have wanted to removed documents with refugees’ testimony for this reason, but notes that there are copies held elsewhere.

He points out that while there was a court order for the search of his home, there was none for the search of the human rights organization, giving grounds to complain to the Human Rights Ombudsperson and Amnesty International in Ukraine.  He considers such treatment to be effectively persecution of human rights activists.

 Share this