Similar articles

Crimean Tatar Mejlis leader ‘sentenced’ to six years for proving Crimea did not ask for Russia’s annexation Vital law will help defend Crimean Tatars and torpedo Russia"s justification for annexing Crimea Remembrance banned as ‘extremism’ and political trials on anniversary of Crimean Tatar DeportationMay 18 is a mourning day for the Crimean Tatar peopleRussia fraternizes with the Taliban, but accuses peaceful Crimean Tatars of ‘terrorism’ Crimean Tatar journalist faces 15-year sentence for ‘planning to overthrow the Russian regime’ with book on being alone with God Comparing Stalin to Hitler could soon get you prosecuted in Russia, saying they both invaded Poland already hasProminent Russian human rights lawyer arrested for doing his job Russia inadvertently reveals how it poured ammunition into Ukraine in 2015Russia scales back troops, not its escalation of repression in occupied Crimea Russia’s remake trial of Crimean Tatar Mejlis leader provides evidence for international courts Terrorism charges in Russia – for a social media repost and for supporting Ukraine Russian invaders sentence elderly Ukrainian woman to 12 years on ‘treason’ charges Russian court removes Crimean Tatar political prisoners for speaking their native language Shevchenko and Russia’s first Ukrainian political prisoner in occupied Crimea Russia bans Crimean Tatar leader Mustafa Dzhemilev for longer than he spent in Soviet labour campsRussian-occupied Crimea and Donbas close to North Korea in Freedom House rating Remember Reshat Ametov, tortured and slain for opposing Russia’s occupation of Crimea Crimean Resistance to Russian Aggression and Moscow’s Savage Revenge Russian occupiers of Crimea puts 66-year-old Ukrainian on trial for ‘state treason’

How Not to Become a War Criminal: A Guide for Russian Soldiers

Valentyn Badrak, Lada Roslycky, Mykhailo Samus, Volodymyr Kopchak

First published by the Atlantic Council 

An officer of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) stands next to a monitor showing a man, who according to SBU is a Russian army major detained by Ukrainian servicemen at the weekend, during a news briefing in Kyiv, Ukraine, July 29, 2015. REUTERS/Valentyn Ogirenko

Few Russian citizens view the Kremlin’s invasion into Ukraine as unlawful. Not many Russian servicemen realize that when they are fighting there, they fight as unnamed, faceless soldiers who lack the protection of international pacts, including the Geneva Conventions. They not only risk death, injury, or abandonment by the state that sent them there; they also risk becoming war criminals.

The Kremlin has dragged Russia’s army into actions that, legally, can only be carried out by subversive special forces. If special force officers return alive, they are not disowned because of their special status. However, the systematic use of regular or contracted army personnel for such purposes amounts to criminal military commands. Those who knowingly obey manifestly unlawful military orders transform themselves into war criminals

Obeying such orders under duress (as appears to have been the case with at least 250 people in one case) may offer legal recourse in some situations. Nonetheless, it is better to listen to the warning given by the chairwoman of the Union of the Committees of Soldiers’ Mothers of Russia and not get involved at all: “When military enlistment offices recruit, they promise money. No one tells them that they will be war criminals. Nobody says that they go there impersonal, anonymous, and that everyone will then spit on them, on their families.”

Recourse exists for those who do not want to serve. Despite the fact that in December 2015, the Russian Duma declared the “supremacy of national legislation of the Russian Federation over international law,” Russian legislation emphasizes the “need to adhere to international and national law during participation in international military operations.”

The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation says, “If a person following an order was aware of the order being unlawful, they become complicit in the crime, with the superior being held as the organizer of the crime, and the subordinate, the executor.” According to the statutes currently in effect, military servicemen are only obliged to follow lawful orders and most orders must be given in writing. In case of doubt, military service people should request a written order from their superior. Otherwise, the subordinate runs the risk of becoming a war criminal. A prime example of this is the Russian crew operating the BUK anti-aircraft missile system that destroyed the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17, killing 283 innocent civilians over Ukraine.

Russian servicemen have legal recourse against unlawful orders, both within Russia as well as internationally. By collecting pertinent evidence, they may claim damages, as well as refugee status abroad. They have the right to contest a verdict in Russian courts, as in the European Court of Human Rights, and to participate in claims against Russian-sponsored terrorism at the International Court of Justice. They and their families are also able to file for considerable financial and moral compensation from the Russian government.

Understanding that violent events in Ukraine are being orchestrated by Russia’s top leaders, Russian military servicemen who find themselves fighting Russia’s undeclared wars—whether unwittingly or under duress—can protect themselves. They can collect proof of being coerced to following unlawful orders and engaging in unlawful combat. Such proof can consist of, but is not limited to, the following:  

  • Collecting originals and photocopies of battle orders and instructions that confirm their unlawful nature, including letters of assignment;
  • Making video and audio recordings of their superiors issuing orders on tours of duty and missions to undeclared wars;
  • Saving documents used to conceal Russian military servicemen for the aforementioned duties;
  • Preserving maps and schemes of military operations and of Russian troop locations in the disputed regions;
  • Confirming the supply of weapons and military equipment from the Russian Federation and other documents related to logistical support to such areas, particularly the 1st and 2nd Army Corps of the Central Territorial Command of the Southern Military District of the Russian Federation.

The personal decision to serve in an unlawful war is often a difficult one. Understanding the heavy predicament many servicemen face, it is important to recall that a system ensuring basic human rights and freedoms exists and should be utilized. It is there to protect the victims of war, and was created as a result of the wisdom gained from the tyranny of previous world wars.

Valentyn Badrak is the director of the Center for Army, Conversion and Disarmament Studies; Lada Roslycky is a soft power security expert and strategic communications adviser to government and nongovernmental institutions, including DCAF; Mykhailo Samus is the deputy director for international affairs at the Center for Army, Conversion and Disarmament Studies; and Volodymyr Kopchak is the deputy director of the Center for Army, Conversion and Disarmament Studies

 Share this