Ukrainian poet placed in detention as scapegoat over deaths in tragic Odesa fire
Well-known writers and public figures have publicly expressed concern over the arrest and detention of Odesa poet, Andriy Khayetsky on bizarre charges linked with a tragic fire in a college on 4 December 2019. Khayetsky is accused of fire safety infringements although he had left his post at the college over two weeks earlier, and had not, in any case, been directly responsible for fire safety. His detention is particularly disturbing since Khayetsky had resigned from his post due to ill-health after a serious heart operation. It is very widely felt that the authorities are looking for a scapegoat to blame for yet another fire in Odesa, which should not have claimed so many lives.
The firein the morning of 4 December 2019 on the third floor of the Odesa College of Economics, Law and the Hotel and Catering Business, which was housed in an old six-storey building on Troitska St, in the centre of Odesa. The fire spread swiftly over a huge area, making it impossible for people to escape. Sixteen students and lecturers lost their lives, with many others badly injured.
The policethat same day that they had initiated a criminal investigation over infringements of fire regulations.
§ 2 of Ukraine’s Criminal Code).on 18 May, 2020 that the head of the daytime studies department of the college had been placed under house arrest. She is accused of having left an electric heater unattended in her office, with this believed to have caused the fire. The charges against her are of infringing fire regulations, with this leading to a fire that caused fatalities, and damage of a particularly large scale (Article 270
The director of the college, and the administrative and economic affairs manager [admin manager] are already under house arrest, on the same charge. It is unclear whether this is solely by virtue of their positions, or because of specific actions.
Then on 22 May, the Odesa Regional Prosecutor’s Officethat the former deputy administration manager had been remanded in custody, without the possibility of bail. The charges are the same as above, only the prosecutor claimed that Khayetsky had been in hiding, and had therefore been placed on the wanted list.
He had not been in hiding, and had not answered the summonses, since these had been sent to an address that he is not living at.
There was considerable public indignation, especially in Odesa, after the news of Khayetsky’s arrest became known. A friend of the poet’s toldthat Khayetsky had been a witness in the case, and that the investigator had known that he was not living with his parents. Khayetsky had learned in the media of the notification, in absentia, of charges while visiting a friend in Vinnytsa, and had immediately returned to Odesa and gone to the investigator himself, on 21 May. It is already worrying that the investigator should have asked for, and the court agreed to Khayetsky’s detention, once he explained that he had not received the summonses. What makes it all seem positively sinister is that the prosecutor is claiming that Khayetsky was employed in the post until 2 December 2020. He had, in fact, announced that he would be leaving a full month earlier, on 4 November 2019, and his formal resignation was signed on 18 November.
It is curious that the person who replaced Khayetsky, Tetyana Solovey, is not facing charges, but is a witness in the case., the instructions for the post which Khayetsky held made it clear that he was not responsible for fire safety, only for organizing fire safety training. Rotari asserts that Oleksiy Koval was responsible for the fire safety of the entire college, while Tetyana Fomich answered for the block on Troitska St., where the fire took place. This is clear from the payment document for their training, the last section of which had been in September 2019. It seems that the judge even acknowledged his awareness that it was Fomich who bore responsibility for fire safety, although that did not stop him placing Khayetsky in detention.
These two people, Rotari says, are not facing any charges. Nor is there any mention in the case of the fire inspector who, in 2017, reported that the building met fire regulations. It seems very unlikely that, at least in 2019, this was the case since the fire spread quickly enough over four thousand m² for people to have not had time to escape.
Oleh Konstantinov, Chief Editor of Dumskaya,the investigators of using torture through this move. They have knowingly placed a highly vulnerable person into the harsh conditions of the Odesa SIZO [remand prison] not long after a serious operation needed because of a dysfunctional heart valve. It should be noted that this condition would place his life in very real danger in the event of a coronavirus outbreak which is a threat for any prison at the moment. Konstantinov is convinced that the investigators are hoping, in such a situation, ‘to persuade’ Khayetsky to admit to the charges, so that they can get their statistics on convictions over the tragedy, bonuses or even promotion.
Inissued on 26 May, members of PEN Ukraine spoke of “an attempt to deflect public attention, as well as that of the law enforcement bodies, from those whose position meant that they answered for fire safety, and who managed the finance and signed the relevant documents in the college”.
They point out that detention is the harshest possible preventive measure and one that, in this case, has little in common with justice. Khayetsky is a principled and decent person, they believe, who has played an active role in human rights campaigns. He also has third group invalidity status and, with an artificial heart valve, should clearly not be in detention.
They call on the Odesa Court of Appeal to change the preventive measure for one not involving detention.
The appeal hearing is scheduled for 28 May.