war crimes in Ukraine

The Tribunal for Putin (T4P) global initiative was set up in response to the all-out war launched by Russia against Ukraine in February 2022.

Similar articles

Concern over reduced right of judicial review in new Criminal Procedure Code"Law enforcement system not ready for implementation of new CPC"Deals with investigators – progress or grounds for corruption?Parliament advised to revise draft Criminal Procedure CodeAI: Parliament must strengthen safeguards against torture in new CPCForward to a jury system or back to people’s assessors?Verkhovna Rada refuses to support trial by juryOne month under the new Criminal Procedure CodeMajor reduction in number of remand prisoners under new CPCNew CPC restricts right of choice of defenderRussia refuses to investigate the torture to death of Crimean Tatar political prisoner Dzhemil Gafarov Shelling of civilians: The T4P Initiative has prepared a submission to the International Criminal Court. Press ReleaseGenocide in Mariupol. Legal rationale of the international crimeUkraine’s NABU violates the rule of lawVolodymyr Panasenko, victim of Ukraine’s most egregious miscarriage of justice, freed after over 16 yearsMoscow planned the forced deportation of Ukrainians to Russia even before its full-scale invasion‘Defeating Russia in this war increases the chances of making it face justice’ Yevgeniy Zakharov’s interview with the Media Detector NGO (Ukraine) Russian court helps prosecution fake evidence in ‘trial’ of Crimean Tatar civic activist Russia seizes another Ukrainian in occupied Crimea on unprovable ‘sabotage’ charges Putin ally under international arrest warrant admits that Russia stopped Mariupol child from returning to Ukraine

New CPC not as black as it’s painted

25.12.2012    source:
The general consensus from Ukrainian and international lawyers at a recent meeting was that the new Criminal Procedure Code should force all parties to carry out their respective roles more actively and correctly

At a meeting between lawyers from the USA, Canada, the UK, Georgia, Russia and Ukraine to discuss the role of the defence in criminal proceedings, attention was given to criticisms heard of the new Criminal Procedure Code.

Defence lawyers pointed to the reduction in their rights, forgetting that they should be concerned with the rights of defendants in the criminal process. As Arkady Bushchenko from the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union put it, “After all those representing suspects in court cannot have more rights than those whose interests they’re representing since that’s illogical”.

He calls the removal of the possibility of court appeals against a decision to initiate a criminal investigation logical. At the initial stages of the investigation nobody is entitled to say definitely whether the person is guilty of committing the crime or not.

He says that such things are taken very badly by Ukrainian lawyers since they’ve been a big blow to their pride.  He adds that the new CPC was a shock for Ukrainians since it wrenched many participants in the criminal process out of their comfortable state where they could just sit out the proceedings. Now they have to work.

“It’s because of the reluctance of law enforcement officers, judges and lawyers to adapt to new norms of legislation that this progressive document could end up in six months cancelled. We’ll end up being returned to the old legislation”, Mr Bushchenko warns.

He sees the failings of the new CPC lying mainly in the large scope of the Code meaning that not all those who want to can read it right through. He is convinced that the Code is not as terrible as it’s painted.

His view is shared by European and American lawyers. Jeremy McBride, Chair of the Scientific Committee of the European Union’s Fundamental Rights Agency which carried out an assessment of the new Code considers that is adoption increases the chances for improving the human rights situation.

The role of the defence in the criminal process has increased considerably and they now have the right to carry out their own investigation.  At the same time their level of responsibility has also increased with this helping to improve the quality of legal services.  He says that complaints from defence lawyers that there is no norm defending their rights are incomprehensible since the priority is the right to a fair trial of their clients which the lawyer should ensure.  He adds that most European countries have criminal procedure legislation based on this logic. “The main thing now is for Ukrainian judges, prosecutors and defence lawers to re-think their own steps in accordance with the new CPC. The court should begin treating submissions from Prosecutor s with scepticism, and this should result in an increase in the number of acquittals”

Edward A. Racker, well-known US attorney believes the new CPC will force the prosecution and defence to work more actively. “One will begin gathering evidence of the suspect’s guilt better, but the other evidence refuting this. The judges will have to be more demanding in their attitude to both parties. This will increase the guarantees that innocent people will not end up behind bars.


 Share this