Crucial hearing in Russia cancelled to block gravely ill Ukrainian student Hryb’s doctor testifying
The latest ‘court hearing’ in Russia’s trial of Pavlo Hryball of two minutes on 18 February. Neither the prosecutor nor the interpreter had turned up in what was clearly a planned move to prevent Hryb’s doctor publicly spelling out how Russia is placing the young man’s life in jeopardy.
Further confirmation that this was deliberate sabotage was provided by the judge’s refusal to allow Dr Vasyl Prytula, who has been treating Hryb since childhood, to examine him. The court also refused to allow either his mother, or the Ukrainian diplomats present to see Hryb.
Russia was ordered by the European Court of Human Rights back in September 2017 to provide details about any medical treatment Hryb was receiving and to allow Ukrainian doctors to examine him. It has effectively flouted this order, with the information it provided almost certainly falsified, and the doctors refused permission to see Hryb.
It had therefore seemed a welcome surprise when, on 2 February, the Northern Caucuses District Military Courtto question Dr Prytula, who is Professor of the Faculty of Paediatric Surgery at the Bohomolets National Medical University and has been treating the young man most of his life. Hryb is suffering from a potentially life-threatening condition, and needs specialist care which he cannot receive in a Russian SIZO [remand prison].
Hryb has repeatedly complained of acute stomach pains and headaches, and paramedics have needed to be called during virtually every hearing. The danger he is facing cannot be overstated. On 12 December 2018, Prytula issuedon the basis of readings taken at a consultative clinic in Rostov. Among other issues, he found that Hryb’s portal hypertension, hypersplenism, including enlargement of the spleen, were developing, and that he was now suffering from liver cirrhosis and reduced ability for blood coagulation (heightening the threat of blood haemorrhages). He wrote that it was possible that Hryb is suffering from an inflamed ulcer in the colon or stomach. This can only heighten the danger of haemorrhaging in the digestive tract, stomach or duodenum, with any of these posing “a critical danger to his life”. He stressed that people with Hryb’s diagnosis need to be treated in a high-level specialist hospital. The court was told at the last hearing that the illness was developing rapidly and that Hryb needed an operation at a specialist clinic, either in Moscow or in Berlin.
Russia is ignoring all of this, with the court not even agreeing to place Hryb under house arrest. It transpired at the hearing on 2 February that the medical documents from the SIZO gave no indication of Hryb’s complaints regarding his state of health.
Hryb, who was then just 19, was seized by the Russian FSB in Gomel, Belarus on 24 August 2017, and taken by force to Krasnodar where he was charged with inciting a young Russian girl, (Tatyana Yershova), to prepare an explosive device to detonate during a school assembly. This is alleged to have been at the instigation of another Ukrainian, Stefan Kapinos, with whom Hryb shared an account on VKontakte.
Hryb’s lawyer Marina Dubrovina hasthat the correspondence between the two teenagers who believed themselves in love has not been provided in the original Ukrainian, but in a supposed translation into Russian. When he was first presented with these alleged fragments of the correspondence, Hryb immediately stated that he could not say what was true, and what was falsified, but said that “we did not speak about that”.
The entire prosecution is based on some alleged words spoken in the course of conversation, so clearly the fact that the FSB is not providing the original suggests that they have something to hide.
The prosecution claims that the suggestion regarding a bomb at the school which the young girl hated was made during Skype conversations between March 27 and April 13, 2017, with the supposed date for the bomb set at 30 June.
While there are no independent records of those conversations, there are of later correspondence between the two teenagers. From a month after the alleged mention of a plan to commit an act of terrorism, there is not one word about it. Neither immediately before or on the alleged date chosen, nor afterwards, was there anything to back the FSB’s claim.
Instead, there is video footage which corroborates Hryb’s account of the torture he was subjected to by his abductors, his return ticket to Ukraine from Belarus. There is nothing at all to back the FSB’s claim that he was seized in the Smolensk oblast of Russia. Quite the contrary, since Ihor Hryb travelled to Belarus as soon as the family understood that he had disappeared, and sounded the alarm almost immediately.
Please write to Pavlo!
It is very important to show him – and Moscow – that he is not forgotten. crutiny.
Please use the Russian version of his name (Pavel) in any letters and avoid either politics or mention of the ‘case’. Letters need to be in Russian. If this is a problem, you could copy the letter below, perhaps adding a picture or photo.
[In Russian] РФ 344082, Ростовская обл, Ростов-на-Дону, улица Большая Садовая, 31, ФКУ СИЗО-4 ФСИН РОССИИ
Грибу, Павлу Игоревичу, 1988 г.
[In English] Russia, Rostov on the Don, 31 Bolshaya Sadovaya St., SIZO 4
Hryb, Pavel Igorevich (b. 1998)
Желаю Тебе здоровья, мужества и терпения, надеюсь, что очень скоро вернешься домой. Извини меня, что так мало пишу – мне трудно писать по-русски, но мы все о Тебе помним.
[Hi. I wish you good health, courage and patience and hope that you will soon return home. I’m sorry that this letter is so short – it’s hard for me to write in Russian., but we’re all thinking about you. ]