Ukraine: No peace talks possible if Russia continues with fake referendums to annex Ukrainian territory
The Russian-installed ‘head’ of the occupied parts of the Zaporizhzhia oblast formallyon 8 August preparations for a so-called ‘referendum on joining the Russian Federation’. Since Edward Balitsky had already issued a ‘decree’ on forming ‘election commissions for a referendum’ s two weeks earlier, the announcement was scarcely newsworthy, and seemed aimed at creating a propaganda event presenting such a ‘referendum’ as “the initiative of the people”. The only hiccup, however, was that the 700 people needed to be bused in to occupied Melitopol as the vast majority of local residents want nothing to do with this farce.
Balitsky was at a so-called forum in Melitopol under the title “We are together with Russia’. The videoed stunt was shown on Russian television with it claimed that the “participants in the forum voted unanimously” for the proposal to hold a ‘referendum’. There was nothing to suggest that votes had actually been counted.
Ivan Fedorov, the democratically elected Mayor of Melitopol , also saw the ‘announcement’ as an attempt to create propaganda for Moscow and for Balitsky to thus please his new paymasters. Fedorovthat the invaders’ “plans for a pseudo-referendum are on the brink of collapse – even at machine gunpoint, no more than 10% of Melitopol residents support russia.”
In order to imitate ‘mass support’, Fedorov said, and stage their ‘forum’ at the Palace of Sport, collaborator Balitsky and the Russian invaders who installed him bused in people from other occupied parts of the Zaporizhzhia oblast. Fedorov points out that Balitsky’s attempt, without Russian weapons, to get himself elected was an abysmal failure, with him receiving less than 10% of the votes. He calls him a “mentally ill would-be-king” who has thought up a title for himself. Fedorov is doubtless correct about Balitsky, but it must be said that Russia uses this type of individual everywhere. Sergei Aksyonov, the pro-Russian politician with a criminal background, whom the Russians installed after invading Crimea had an even smaller percentage of the votes. Vitaliy Yefymenko, one of the Russian-installed collaborators in the Kherson oblast who has not (yet) been killed or gravely injured by Ukrainian partisans,in 2013 for armed robbery.
Russia has clearly been planning to stage a ‘referendum’, either on creating another so-called ‘people’s republic’ or on ‘joining the Russian Federation’ since it seized around two-thirds of the Zaporizhzhia oblast, although not Zaporizhzhia itself.
Russia is clearly assuming that it can pull off the same ‘referendum stunt’ and speedy annexation as it did with Crimea in February – March 2014. Soon after the pseudo-referendum was announced, Oleg Morozov, a Russian State Duma deputy from the ruling United Russia partythat the process of what he called ‘joining the Russian Federation’ could take just a few days. The Crimean ‘referendum’ which did not have an option for retaining the status quo within Ukraine, was staged on 16 March, with formal annexation a mere two days later.
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has already stated clearly that the holding of such ‘referendums’ will remove any possibility of peace negotiations with Russia. It is important that western countries react strongly, both with sanctions and by increasing military supplies to Ukraine. Such referendums should, after all, leave nobody in any doubt as to the dangers to Ukraine and to other countries neighbouring Russia if the latter does not sustain decisive defeat against Ukraine’s Armed Forces.
On 7 August, the Kherson Regional Administrationthat the Russian occupiers have been trying to bribe people to take part in the fake referendum there, with people offered ten thousand roubles in ‘aid’. It is near certain that the same methods will be used in occupied parts of the Zaporizhzhia oblast.
As reported earlier, the ruling United Russia party has been setting up fake ‘help centres’ in parts of Ukraine seized by the Russian army in order to trick residents into providing personal data. Such data is essentially all that is required to rig the ‘required’ result, with nobody in any doubt that the percentage of those alleged to have ‘voted to join Russia’ will be fixed in Moscow and have absolutely nothing to do with what happens on the ground on occupied territory.